[opensuse-factory] Set GNOME:Ayatana:Indicators as a Factory devel project
Please set G:A:I as a Factory devel project. It is a more appropriate place to maintain packages like libappindicator than X11:MATE:Factory. Regards. Benjamin -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
On Mon, 2015-03-23 at 17:03 +0100, Benjamin Denisart wrote:
Please set G:A:I as a Factory devel project. It is a more appropriate place to maintain packages like libappindicator than X11:MATE:Factory.
GNOME:Ayatana is dead - and the namespace GNOME not really appropriate
here. Mate is the one using the indicators... why not maintain them
there?
Dominique
--
Dimstar / Dominique Leuenberger
Am 23.03.2015 um 17:03 schrieb Benjamin Denisart:
Please set G:A:I as a Factory devel project. It is a more appropriate place to maintain packages like libappindicator than X11:MATE:Factory.
Is any other package in factory maintained there? Greetings, Stephan -- Ma muaß weiterkämpfen, kämpfen bis zum Umfalln, a wenn die ganze Welt an Arsch offen hat, oder grad deswegn. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
On 03/23/2015 05:18 PM, Stephan Kulow wrote:
Am 23.03.2015 um 17:03 schrieb Benjamin Denisart:
Please set G:A:I as a Factory devel project. It is a more appropriate place to maintain packages like libappindicator than X11:MATE:Factory.
Is any other package in factory maintained there?
Greetings, Stephan
libappindicator, libdbusmenu, libindicator. @Dimstar we try with another guy to complete indicators collection. And MATE is not the only one able to run indicators i.e xfce. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
On Mon, 2015-03-23 at 17:21 +0100, Benjamin Denisart wrote:
On 03/23/2015 05:18 PM, Stephan Kulow wrote:
Am 23.03.2015 um 17:03 schrieb Benjamin Denisart:
Please set G:A:I as a Factory devel project. It is a more appropriate place to maintain packages like libappindicator than X11:MATE:Factory.
Is any other package in factory maintained there?
Greetings, Stephan
libappindicator, libdbusmenu, libindicator. @Dimstar we try with another guy to complete indicators collection. And MATE is not the only one able to run indicators i.e xfce.
But GNOME is not one; so the namespace GNOME is misleading.
What about maintaining those packages in X11:common:Factory? (Or
possibly X11:common:Indicators, if they must be in an own prj?)
Dominique
--
Dimstar / Dominique Leuenberger
On Monday 23 March 2015 17.28:11 Dimstar / Dominique Leuenberger wrote:
On Mon, 2015-03-23 at 17:21 +0100, Benjamin Denisart wrote:
On 03/23/2015 05:18 PM, Stephan Kulow wrote:
Am 23.03.2015 um 17:03 schrieb Benjamin Denisart:
Please set G:A:I as a Factory devel project. It is a more appropriate place to maintain packages like libappindicator than X11:MATE:Factory.
Is any other package in factory maintained there?
Greetings, Stephan
libappindicator, libdbusmenu, libindicator. @Dimstar we try with another guy to complete indicators collection. And MATE is not the only one able to run indicators i.e xfce.
But GNOME is not one; so the namespace GNOME is misleading.
What about maintaining those packages in X11:common:Factory? (Or possibly X11:common:Indicators, if they must be in an own prj?)
Dominique
virt-manager need them if that can help to choose a right project :-) -- Bruno Friedmann Ioda-Net Sàrl www.ioda-net.ch openSUSE Member & Board, fsfe fellowship GPG KEY : D5C9B751C4653227 irc: tigerfoot
On 03/23/2015 06:37 PM, Bruno Friedmann wrote:
On Monday 23 March 2015 17.28:11 Dimstar / Dominique Leuenberger wrote:
On Mon, 2015-03-23 at 17:21 +0100, Benjamin Denisart wrote:
On 03/23/2015 05:18 PM, Stephan Kulow wrote:
Am 23.03.2015 um 17:03 schrieb Benjamin Denisart:
Please set G:A:I as a Factory devel project. It is a more appropriate place to maintain packages like libappindicator than X11:MATE:Factory.
Is any other package in factory maintained there?
Greetings, Stephan
libappindicator, libdbusmenu, libindicator. @Dimstar we try with another guy to complete indicators collection. And MATE is not the only one able to run indicators i.e xfce. But GNOME is not one; so the namespace GNOME is misleading.
What about maintaining those packages in X11:common:Factory? (Or possibly X11:common:Indicators, if they must be in an own prj?)
Dominique
virt-manager need them if that can help to choose a right project :-)
I have asked for a new project into X11:common. No answer for the time, but hope I'll have some news quickly. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
participants (4)
-
Benjamin Denisart -
Bruno Friedmann -
Dimstar / Dominique Leuenberger -
Stephan Kulow