On 09/05/2013 03:40 PM, Tomáš Chvátal wrote:

Dne Čt 5. září 2013 15:41:13, johann Luce napsal(a):

...

hi

all is in the title

thanks for your answers

Hello, for patterns you should look up github repo [1]. From there it shoudl be at least somehow straight-forward to do.

Yes, "somehow" is the right term. Last time I was removing something from an existing pattern I understood how to remove it but the rest was unclear, I made a mental note (and also another one in my calendar) to add a README file that would describe the rest (process who does what and how and link to Libzypp documentation, for instance). I'd love if someone who actually knows the process added a README (or even README.md/markdown) to the root of that project. Pretty please :) Bye Lukas -- Lukas Ocilka, Cloud & Systems Management Department SUSE LINUX s.r.o., Praha -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org

Hello, Am Donnerstag, 5. September 2013 schrieb Stephan Kulow:

On 05.09.2013 15:40, Tomáš Chvátal wrote:

...

Hello, for patterns you should look up github repo [1]. From there it shoudl be at least somehow straight-forward to do.

Unfortunately it's not as you have to patch the patterns *package* too, but I want to get rid of that ;(

Wouldn't it be easier the other way round? ;-) I'd prefer to get rid of patterns (including their somehow special syntax) and just have the pattern-* packages which use the spec syntax every packager knows. (And yes, I know things are probably not that easy ;-) Regards, Christian Boltz -- P.S.: In der kommenden Version sollen die besten Eigenschaften von Windows CE, Me und NT vereinigt werden zu "Windows CEMENT". Wenn das mal nicht'n stabiles OS wird. ;-))))) [Ratti in suse-linux] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org