Re: [opensuse-factory] Re: [opensuse-buildservice] Build problem with VirtualBox 5.1.x in Leap 42.2
On 08/26/2016 10:30 AM, Stratos Zolotas wrote:
Hello guys,
Tumbleweed is now at 5.0.18, are we going to see a newer version also?
It has been "in review" at Factory for 5 days. You tell me if we will see a new version any time soon! Larry -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
On Fri, 2016-08-26 at 11:01 -0500, Larry Finger wrote:
On 08/26/2016 10:30 AM, Stratos Zolotas wrote:
Hello guys,
Tumbleweed is now at 5.0.18, are we going to see a newer version also?
It has been "in review" at Factory for 5 days. You tell me if we will see a new version any time soon!
And for 3 days it had a comment stating why this won't ever move forward. Larry - Submitting is a two-way street: you ask for a review, the reviewers give feedback and requests action upon it... Maintaining a package is not a fire-and-forget. In the specific case, the "ExclusiveArch: %ix86 x86_64" goes lost. It was once changed to disabled i586 in the past, but now is completely removed, which means you claim ARM And PPC64LE support on it. But it does not build for those archs. So, please, everybody (Not Larry specifically): before you claim on 'how long YOU have to wait for something to move' - also consider how long you let stuff linger around until reactions on the comments happen. There are submissions that fly through minimal stagings in less than a day, I have seen full stagings in 1 - 2 days. Of course it takes a bit of luck for not breaking other things AND it especially takes responsible maintainers. Cheers, Dominique
On Fri, 2016-08-26 at 11:01 -0500, Larry Finger wrote:
On 08/26/2016 10:30 AM, Stratos Zolotas wrote:
Hello guys,
Tumbleweed is now at 5.0.18, are we going to see a newer version also?
It has been "in review" at Factory for 5 days. You tell me if we will see a new version any time soon!
And for 3 days it had a comment stating why this won't ever move forward - granted, it could have been declined outright too (which a lot of contributors feel more offensive that a comment) Larry - Submitting is a two-way street: you ask for a review, the reviewers give feedback and requests action upon it... Maintaining a package is not a fire-and-forget. In the specific case, the "ExclusiveArch: %ix86 x86_64" goes lost. It was once changed to disabled i586 in the past, but now is completely removed, which means you claim ARM And PPC64LE support on it. But it does not build for those archs. So, please, everybody (Not Larry specifically): before you claim on 'how long YOU have to wait for something to move' - also consider how long you let stuff linger around until reactions on the comments happen. There are submissions that fly through minimal stagings in less than a day, I have seen full stagings in 1 - 2 days. Of course it takes a bit of luck for not breaking other things AND it especially takes responsible maintainers. Cheers, Dominique
On 08/27/2016 04:53 AM, Dominique Leuenberger / DimStar wrote:
On Fri, 2016-08-26 at 11:01 -0500, Larry Finger wrote:
On 08/26/2016 10:30 AM, Stratos Zolotas wrote:
Hello guys,
Tumbleweed is now at 5.0.18, are we going to see a newer version also?
It has been "in review" at Factory for 5 days. You tell me if we will see a new version any time soon!
And for 3 days it had a comment stating why this won't ever move forward - granted, it could have been declined outright too (which a lot of contributors feel more offensive that a comment)
Larry - Submitting is a two-way street: you ask for a review, the reviewers give feedback and requests action upon it... Maintaining a package is not a fire-and-forget.
In the specific case, the "ExclusiveArch: %ix86 x86_64" goes lost. It was once changed to disabled i586 in the past, but now is completely removed, which means you claim ARM And PPC64LE support on it. But it does not build for those archs.
So, please, everybody (Not Larry specifically): before you claim on 'how long YOU have to wait for something to move' - also consider how long you let stuff linger around until reactions on the comments happen. There are submissions that fly through minimal stagings in less than a day, I have seen full stagings in 1 - 2 days. Of course it takes a bit of luck for not breaking other things AND it especially takes responsible maintainers.
I missed that comment in my E-mail. That certainly is my fault; however, I have no idea how the ExclusiveArch statement got removed. The fixed package is now building. Larry -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
On Sat, 2016-08-27 at 21:12 -0500, Larry Finger wrote:
Hello guys,
Tumbleweed is now at 5.0.18, are we going to see a newer version also?
It has been "in review" at Factory for 5 days. You tell me if we will see a new version any time soon!
And for 3 days it had a comment stating why this won't ever move forward - granted, it could have been declined outright too (which a lot of contributors feel more offensive that a comment)
Larry - Submitting is a two-way street: you ask for a review, the reviewers give feedback and requests action upon it... Maintaining a package is not a fire-and-forget.
In the specific case, the "ExclusiveArch: %ix86 x86_64" goes lost. It was once changed to disabled i586 in the past, but now is completely removed, which means you claim ARM And PPC64LE support on it. But it does not build for those archs.
So, please, everybody (Not Larry specifically): before you claim on 'how long YOU have to wait for something to move' - also consider how long you let stuff linger around until reactions on the comments happen. There are submissions that fly through minimal stagings in less than a day, I have seen full stagings in 1 - 2 days. Of course it takes a bit of luck for not breaking other things AND it especially takes responsible maintainers.
I missed that comment in my E-mail. That certainly is my fault; however, I have no idea how the ExclusiveArch statement got removed.
The fixed package is now building.
Just to clarify for the occasional reader, so I don't have to hear that question for the next couple days: Larry meant 'it is building in his own home branch'; the change is not yet submitted to openSUSE:Factory or available in the devel repo. Larry submitted it to the devel project though (yesterday). Cheers, Dominique
Just to clarify for the occasional reader, so I don't have to hear that question for the next couple days:
Larry meant 'it is building in his own home branch'; the change is not yet submitted to openSUSE:Factory or available in the devel repo. Larry submitted it to the devel project though (yesterday).
Cheers, Dominique
You're so good at clarifing things. Are you in fact the light bulb we saw on some of our wallpapers ? :-)) -- Bruno Friedmann Ioda-Net Sàrl www.ioda-net.ch Bareos Partner, openSUSE Member, fsfe fellowship GPG KEY : D5C9B751C4653227 irc: tigerfoot -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
On 08/30/2016 02:18 PM, Bruno Friedmann wrote:
Just to clarify for the occasional reader, so I don't have to hear that question for the next couple days:
Larry meant 'it is building in his own home branch'; the change is not yet submitted to openSUSE:Factory or available in the devel repo. Larry submitted it to the devel project though (yesterday).
Cheers, Dominique
You're so good at clarifing things.
Are you in fact the light bulb we saw on some of our wallpapers ?
:-))
haha... Good one ;-) -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
participants (5)
-
Bruno Friedmann -
Dominique Leuenberger -
Dominique Leuenberger / DimStar -
Larry Finger -
Roman Bysh