[opensuse-factory] Package removal notice
Dear hackers and users, this is a courtesy message to let you know that the following packages will receive delete requests shortly, as they failed to build for > 3 months without any feedback from the maintainers. If there is a package in the list which you feel strongly for, please speak up && (find a maintainer || take maintainership) The packages will now enter the removal process. Of course, the package can be re-added at any time in the future if the problems associated to it are being settled. The packages in question are: (all in openSUSE:Factory) * python-veusz * idutils + global (depends on idutilS) * openlmi-providers + openlmi-networking * pam_passwdqc * lbzip2 * dc3dd * crosstool-ng * python3-efl + econnman + epymc + lekha * perf * hedgewars The ones marked as + FOO are packages depending on the one it's listed under. They would possibly not fail on their own) Cheers Dominique
I'll take a look at hedgewars this weekend. It had an upstream fix for
586 the day after the last update.
Even if I can't fix 586, surely it can stay as x64 works fine?
On Fri, 14 Jun 2019 at 14:14, Dominique Leuenberger / DimStar
Dear hackers and users, * hedgewars
The ones marked as + FOO are packages depending on the one it's listed under. They would possibly not fail on their own)
Cheers Dominique
-- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
Dear Dominique, Thanks for the notice. But... On Fri, 2019-06-14 at 15:13 +0200, Dominique Leuenberger / DimStar wrote:
Dear hackers and users,
this is a courtesy message to let you know that the following packages will receive delete requests shortly, as they failed to build for > 3 months without any feedback from the maintainers.
If there is a package in the list which you feel strongly for, please
speak up && (find a maintainer || take maintainership)
The packages will now enter the removal process. Of course, the package can be re-added at any time in the future if the problems associated to it are being settled.
The packages in question are: (all in openSUSE:Factory) * python-veusz
...is this because just the i586 builds fail (x86_64 builds just fine)? I would suggest to simply disable i586 builds at the repository level, but otherwise I am committed to maintaining this (as I have for a while now). Thanks and best wishes. -- -- Atri Bhattacharya Fri 14 Jun 16:35:29 CEST 2019 Sent from openSUSE Tumbleweed 20190607 on my laptop. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
On Fri, 2019-06-14 at 16:35 +0200, badshah400@gmail.com wrote:
Dear Dominique, Thanks for the notice. But...
The packages in question are: (all in openSUSE:Factory)
* python-veusz
...is this because just the i586 builds fail (x86_64 builds just fine)? I would suggest to simply disable i586 builds at the repository level, but otherwise I am committed to maintaining this (as I have for a while now).
Thanks and best wishes.
I treat a package as 'failing' for Factory when openSUSE:Factory/$PKG shows any 'failed' entry. openSUSE:Factory accepts packages and changes for packages via submissions - but there are no meta changes to the package (build enable/disable) - if the package claims to not work in i586, it has to specify so in the .spec file by means of ExcludeArch/ExclusiveArch. Cheers, Dominique
On 6/14/19 6:40 AM, Jiri Slaby wrote:
On 14. 06. 19, 15:13, Dominique Leuenberger / DimStar wrote:
* perf
Perf??? Let me be the maintainer...
request 709990
thanks,
Why did automated emails that it was not building cease in March? According to the bug you opened, two were sent, the last was sent on March 11th. Fixing now. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
On Freitag, 14. Juni 2019 16:13:40 CEST Jon Brightwell wrote:
I'll take a look at hedgewars this weekend. It had an upstream fix for 586 the day after the last update. Even if I can't fix 586, surely it can stay as x64 works fine?
Please have a look at https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/710016 Kind regards, Stefan -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
On Fri, 2019-06-14 at 09:36 -0700, Tony Jones wrote:
On 6/14/19 6:40 AM, Jiri Slaby wrote:
On 14. 06. 19, 15:13, Dominique Leuenberger / DimStar wrote:
* perf
Perf??? Let me be the maintainer...
request 709990
thanks,
Why did automated emails that it was not building cease in March?
According to the bug you opened, two were sent, the last was sent on March 11th.
Fixing now.
2 mails are sent to the maintainer: after 2 weeks of 'build fail' and 'one week later a reminder'. sending another 15 mails in the hope the maintainer might 'catch one of them'? or what do you suggest? for public consumption: the bot is currently being adjusted to send the mail to the maintainer(s) (as-is) twice (after two and three weeks) - and then, another week later, send it to opensuse-factory for public information (1 mail max per day, grouping the packages into one mail). If nothing comes out of that, the bot will be instructed to file delete requests on my behalf (often, this DOES wake up people, when nothing else does) Cheers, Dominique
On 6/14/19 9:40 AM, Dominique Leuenberger / DimStar wrote:
2 mails are sent to the maintainer: after 2 weeks of 'build fail' and 'one week later a reminder'.
sending another 15 mails in the hope the maintainer might 'catch one of them'? or what do you suggest I don't know how I missed the two messages, perhaps in the jam of SLE work and the endless Jira emails filling my inbox.
So yes, sending more would be a good idea as would cc'ing the maintainer on any such 'package removal notice' emails. Also you just opened a bugzilla so clearly that is another option. I thought I was signed up for automatic notification inside the BS for non building packages. Jiri, I'll add you as backup maintainer. Fix submitted. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
On 14/06/2019 22:43, Dominique Leuenberger / DimStar wrote:
Dear hackers and users,
this is a courtesy message to let you know that the following packages will receive delete requests shortly, as they failed to build for > 3 months without any feedback from the maintainers.
If there is a package in the list which you feel strongly for, please
speak up && (find a maintainer || take maintainership)
The packages will now enter the removal process. Of course, the package can be re-added at any time in the future if the problems associated to it are being settled.
The packages in question are: (all in openSUSE:Factory) * python3-efl + econnman + epymc + lekha I guess I missed a submit request, python-efl will replace it as a single spec version, https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/710031 that will hopefully fix the other deps.
-- Simon Lees (Simotek) http://simotek.net Emergency Update Team keybase.io/simotek SUSE Linux Adelaide Australia, UTC+10:30 GPG Fingerprint: 5B87 DB9D 88DC F606 E489 CEC5 0922 C246 02F0 014B -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
Greetings.
On Fri, 14 Jun 2019 15:13:18 +0200, Dominique Leuenberger /
DimStar
* lbzip2
This package is failing to build due to breakage in upstream gnulib (due to glibc 2.28 making incompatible changes). The problem affects (or affected) not only lbzip2, but many other pieces of software that depend on gnulib. (For example, it also broke gzip.) This has happened for many other GNU/Linux distributions besides openSUSE. Upstream bug reports for lbzip2 and glibc: https://github.com/kjn/lbzip2/issues/22 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=915171 Gnulib has since been fixed. Since it's not distributed as a library, all packages that depend on it need to have their source code manually updated. I have produced an buildable version of the lbzip2 RPM using the latest version of gnulib and submitted it to the main lbzip2 project: https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/710118 Hopefully the maintainer will accept it soon. If not, as a last resort, you could appoint me to take over the project. Regards, Tristan -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Tristan Miller Free Software developer, ferret herder, logologist https://logological.org/ =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Dear Dominique,
On Sat, 15 Jun 2019 19:29:02 +0200, Tristan Miller
I have produced an buildable version of the lbzip2 RPM using the latest version of gnulib and submitted it to the main lbzip2 project: https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/710118 Hopefully the maintainer will accept it soon.
The request has been accepted so the official lbzip2 RPM is now building without errors. I take it this means it can be taken off your hit-list. :) Regards, Tristan -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Tristan Miller Free Software developer, ferret herder, logologist https://logological.org/ =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Am Freitag, 14. Juni 2019, 15:13:18 CEST schrieb Dominique Leuenberger / DimStar:
Dear hackers and users,
this is a courtesy message to let you know that the following packages will receive delete requests shortly, as they failed to build for > 3 months without any feedback from the maintainers.
* pam_passwdqc
... this one has two maintainers: coolo and you... Trying to fix that one. Cheers MH -- gpg key fingerprint: 8029 2240 F4DD 7776 E7D2 C042 6B8E 029E 13F2 C102 -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
On Mon, 2019-06-17 at 09:45 +0200, Mathias Homann wrote:
Am Freitag, 14. Juni 2019, 15:13:18 CEST schrieb Dominique Leuenberger / DimStar:
Dear hackers and users,
this is a courtesy message to let you know that the following packages will receive delete requests shortly, as they failed to build for > 3 months without any feedback from the maintainers. * pam_passwdqc
... this one has two maintainers: coolo and you...
You are mistaken: inux-PAM/pam_passwdqc bugowner of pam_passwdqc : ckornacker maintainer of pam_passwdqc : mcalmer, jengelh Don't check user roles in openSUSE:Factory - of course me and coolo are the only 'maintainers' of the distro - but luckily we don't have to maintain all 12k packages :) Cheers, Dominique
On Mon, 2019-06-17 at 09:19 +0200, Tristan Miller wrote:
Dear Dominique,
On Sat, 15 Jun 2019 19:29:02 +0200, Tristan Miller
wrote: I have produced an buildable version of the lbzip2 RPM using the latest version of gnulib and submitted it to the main lbzip2 project: https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/710118 Hopefully the maintainer will accept it soon.
The request has been accepted so the official lbzip2 RPM is now building without errors. I take it this means it can be taken off your hit-list. :)
osc rq list openSUSE:Factory libzip2 package openSUSE:Factory/libzip2 does not exist
Not yet - it's fixed only when it's fixed in openSUSE:Factory. But if it's already fixed in the devel prj, that is a good step closer. cheers Dominique
On Monday 2019-06-17 10:16, Dominique Leuenberger / DimStar wrote:
* pam_passwdqc
You are mistaken:
inux-PAM/pam_passwdqc bugowner of pam_passwdqc : ckornacker
maintainer of pam_passwdqc : mcalmer, jengelh
I do not recall signing up for that, so I removed myself there for now.
Don't check user roles in openSUSE:Factory - of course me and coolo are the only 'maintainers' of the distro - but luckily we don't have to maintain all 12k packages :)
In a way you do. Just ilke I am trying to maintain order in submissions as a reviewer :-p -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
participants (10)
-
badshah400@gmail.com
-
Brüns, Stefan
-
Dominique Leuenberger / DimStar
-
Jan Engelhardt
-
Jiri Slaby
-
Jon Brightwell
-
Mathias Homann
-
Simon Lees
-
Tony Jones
-
Tristan Miller