Hello, Maybe boo#960501: https://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=960501. It happens when the lsb package is installed. Regards, -- Antoine -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org

Vojtěch Zeisek wrote:

Dne středa 27. dubna 2016 21:03:57 CEST, Karl Ove Hufthammer napsal(a):

...

When I report a bug in KDE using DrKonqi, it inserts the following information at the top of the bug report:

Distribution: "openSUSE Tumbleweed (20160117) (x86_64)"

Where is this date (2016-01-17) taken from, and what does it mean? (Note that I’m using the latest release of Tumbleweed, *not* one from January 2016.) $ lsb_release -ds "openSUSE Tumbleweed (20160417) (x86_64)" I have 2016-01-17 too, but 2016-04-17 in /etc/os-release:

$ lsb_release -r Release: 20160117 $ lsb_release -ds "openSUSE Tumbleweed (20160117) (x86_64)" $ rpm -qf /etc/os-release openSUSE-release-20160417-1.1.x86_64 $ cat /etc/os-release NAME=openSUSE VERSION="Tumbleweed" VERSION_ID="20160417" PRETTY_NAME="openSUSE Tumbleweed (20160417) (x86_64)" ID=opensuse ANSI_COLOR="0;32" CPE_NAME="cpe:/o:opensuse:opensuse:20160417" BUG_REPORT_URL="https://bugs.opensuse.org" HOME_URL="https://www.opensuse.org/" ID_LIKE="suse" Greetings, Björn -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org

Dne čtvrtek 28. dubna 2016 13:22:11 CEST, Andrei Borzenkov napsal(a):

On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 10:35 AM, Bjoern Voigt wrote:

...

Vojtěch Zeisek wrote:

...

Dne středa 27. dubna 2016 21:03:57 CEST, Karl Ove Hufthammer napsal(a):

...

When I report a bug in KDE using DrKonqi, it inserts the following

information at the top of the bug report: Distribution: "openSUSE Tumbleweed (20160117) (x86_64)"

Where is this date (2016-01-17) taken from, and what does it mean? (Note that I’m using the latest release of Tumbleweed, *not* one from January 2016.)

$ lsb_release -ds "openSUSE Tumbleweed (20160417) (x86_64)"

I have 2016-01-17 too, but 2016-04-17 in /etc/os-release:

$ lsb_release -r Release: 20160117 $ lsb_release -ds "openSUSE Tumbleweed (20160117) (x86_64)" $ rpm -qf /etc/os-release openSUSE-release-20160417-1.1.x86_64

lsb_release takes information from /etc/lsb-release which is created during lsb package install. As "lsb" itself is not updated after initial installation, this file is not updated either.

Does it mean after installation of newer TW snapshot lsb_release becomes useless? Isn't it a bug? -- Vojtěch Zeisek Komunita openSUSE GNU/Linuxu Community of the openSUSE GNU/Linux https://www.opensuse.org/ https://trapa.cz/

Andrei Borzenkov wrote:

On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 10:35 AM, Bjoern Voigt wrote:

...

Vojtěch Zeisek wrote:

...

Dne středa 27. dubna 2016 21:03:57 CEST, Karl Ove Hufthammer napsal(a):

...

When I report a bug in KDE using DrKonqi, it inserts the following information at the top of the bug report:

Distribution: "openSUSE Tumbleweed (20160117) (x86_64)"

Where is this date (2016-01-17) taken from, and what does it mean? (Note that I’m using the latest release of Tumbleweed, *not* one from January 2016.) $ lsb_release -ds "openSUSE Tumbleweed (20160417) (x86_64)" I have 2016-01-17 too, but 2016-04-17 in /etc/os-release:

$ lsb_release -r Release: 20160117 $ lsb_release -ds "openSUSE Tumbleweed (20160117) (x86_64)" $ rpm -qf /etc/os-release openSUSE-release-20160417-1.1.x86_64

lsb_release takes information from /etc/lsb-release which is created during lsb package install. As "lsb" itself is not updated after initial installation, this file is not updated either.

It's created during build. So as long as there's no full rebuild it won't update. Does /etc/lsb-release need to exist anyways? If not the lsb_release command could just parse /etc/os-release instead. If /etc/lsb-release is really needed as file it should probably point to somewhere in /var instead where a trigger on openSUSE-release could update it. cu Ludwig -- (o_ Ludwig Nussel //\ V_/_ http://www.suse.com/ SUSE Linux GmbH, GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg) -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org

02.05.2016 10:14, Vojtěch Zeisek пишет:

Dne čtvrtek 28. dubna 2016 13:22:11 CEST, Andrei Borzenkov napsal(a):

...

On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 10:35 AM, Bjoern Voigt wrote:

...

Vojtěch Zeisek wrote:

...

Dne středa 27. dubna 2016 21:03:57 CEST, Karl Ove Hufthammer napsal(a):

...

When I report a bug in KDE using DrKonqi, it inserts the following

information at the top of the bug report: Distribution: "openSUSE Tumbleweed (20160117) (x86_64)"

Where is this date (2016-01-17) taken from, and what does it mean? (Note that I’m using the latest release of Tumbleweed, *not* one from January 2016.)

$ lsb_release -ds "openSUSE Tumbleweed (20160417) (x86_64)"

I have 2016-01-17 too, but 2016-04-17 in /etc/os-release:

$ lsb_release -r Release: 20160117 $ lsb_release -ds "openSUSE Tumbleweed (20160117) (x86_64)" $ rpm -qf /etc/os-release openSUSE-release-20160417-1.1.x86_64

lsb_release takes information from /etc/lsb-release which is created during lsb package install. As "lsb" itself is not updated after initial installation, this file is not updated either.

After upgrade to the newest snapshot: $ lsb_release -ds "openSUSE Tumbleweed (20160422) (x86_64)” So that its output has been updated.

Ludwig corrected me that this file is created during package build, not package install. So if this package was rebuilt, this is expected.