Hi all: If I can divert your energies for a moment from an excellent debate. It relates only slightly tenuously off topic (since SuSE/SUSE is now SuSELL). At my current school they are Novell-o-philes and use a Linux partition on every machine to deliver a customised M$ partition (I am, with the support of most at the school, trialling thin client to get rid of M$ completely-watch this space). However, they would like to modify the 2.4.18 kernel they use so that it can run a tftp server so that they can load some new files onto one machine locally and then push it out to all at the site. We have taken over the LEA support contract for 8 local promaries and hope to get more. All of them use OO. Since they are familiar now, they will have none of the objections cited by other writers on this list from parents. The battle needs to be started at an earlier stage and primaries I think are much more recipient to the get rid of M$ argument. Does anyone have any suggestions as to how this might be done? I know that tftp as a client sits in the sbin or bin, but we need a tftp server. I have recompilled a kernel a few times before with pretty guis but have not toyed at the command line. Paul
Hi all:
If I can divert your energies for a moment from an excellent debate. It relates only slightly tenuously off topic (since SuSE/SUSE is now SuSELL). At my current school they are Novell-o-philes and use a Linux partition on every machine to deliver a customised M$ partition (I am, with the support of most at the school, trialling thin client to get rid of M$ completely-watch this space). However, they would like to modify the 2.4.18 kernel they use so that it can run a tftp server so that they can load some new files onto one machine locally and then push it out to all at the site. We have taken over the LEA support contract for 8 local promaries and hope to get more. All of them use OO. Since they are familiar now, they will have none of
objections cited by other writers on this list from parents. The battle needs to be started at an earlier stage and primaries I think are much more recipient to the get rid of M$ argument. Does anyone have any suggestions as to how this might be done? I know
Why would you want to compile a FTP server into the kernel. I have never
heard of anybody doing that before. There is a multitude of FTP servers
available for Linux. proFTP is the easiest the setup. If you can set up
Apache you can set up proFTP, since the config files are almost identical.
pureFTP is the most secure, so the choice is yours
Regards
John
----- Original Message -----
From: "Paul Taylor"
tftp as a client sits in the sbin or bin, but we need a tftp server. I have recompilled a kernel a few times before with pretty guis but have not toyed at the command line. Paul
-- To unsubscribe, e-mail: suse-linux-uk-schools-unsubscribe@suse.com For additional commands, e-mail: suse-linux-uk-schools-help@suse.com
Why would you want to compile a FTP server into the kernel. I have never heard of anybody doing that before. Me neither and I am only passing on what was asked of me. I have some reasonable experience of Linux as I have been using it for 6 years, but I would not call myself an expert. The guys in Tech support have used the
On Thursday 27 Nov 2003 7:58 pm, you wrote: linux kernel and lilo for 3-4 years as part of Novell but know little of Linux. I think (from what they have said to me) they would like to have a custom kernel that has tftp capabilities so that when they go to remote schools to do the never ending M$ updates, they can boot the linux kernel and download a new partition of changes. The linux kernel is unaffected and they can then ghost the machine and pump it out to all the others on site usig Zend. As I said earlier, I hope this is a temprorary measure as I will eliminate M$ from the school as soon as I can.
There is a multitude of FTP servers available for Linux. proFTP is the easiest the setup. If you can set up Apache you can set up proFTP, since the config files are almost identical. pureFTP is the most secure, so the choice is yours
Regards John
----- Original Message ----- From: "Paul Taylor"
To: "SuSE for Schools" Sent: Thursday, November 27, 2003 7:07 PM Subject: [suse-linux-uk-schools] kernel bogie Hi all:
If I can divert your energies for a moment from an excellent debate. It relates only slightly tenuously off topic (since SuSE/SUSE is now SuSELL). At my current school they are Novell-o-philes and use a Linux partition on every machine to deliver a customised M$ partition (I am, with the support
of
most at the school, trialling thin client to get rid of M$
completely-watch
this space). However, they would like to modify the 2.4.18 kernel they
use
so that it can run a tftp server so that they can load some new files onto one machine locally and then push it out to all at the site. We have
taken
over the LEA support contract for 8 local promaries and hope to get more. All of them use OO. Since they are familiar now, they will have none of
the
objections cited by other writers on this list from parents. The battle needs to be started at an earlier stage and primaries I think are much
more
recipient to the get rid of M$ argument. Does anyone have any suggestions as to how this might be done? I know
that
tftp as a client sits in the sbin or bin, but we need a tftp server. I
have
recompilled a kernel a few times before with pretty guis but have not
toyed
at the command line. Paul
-- To unsubscribe, e-mail: suse-linux-uk-schools-unsubscribe@suse.com For additional commands, e-mail: suse-linux-uk-schools-help@suse.com
Hi
----- Original Message -----
From: "Paul Taylor"
On Thursday 27 Nov 2003 7:58 pm, you wrote:
Why would you want to compile a FTP server into the kernel. I have never heard of anybody doing that before. Me neither and I am only passing on what was asked of me. I have some reasonable experience of Linux as I have been using it for 6 years, but I would not call myself an expert.
I came to Linux from UNIX so it wasn't much of a transition. But this was in the early days of Linux, when you had to download the whole lot useing your "Ultra fast" 9600kbit modem and then copy each chunk onto a montain of 3.5" floppies. If you didn't have the correct hardware you had no chance of installing it. My original 386 box is still alive and well but is now collecting dust in the loft
The guys in Tech support have used the linux kernel and lilo for 3-4 years as part of Novell but know little of Linux.
I think (from what they have said to me) they would like to have a custom kernel that has tftp capabilities so that when they go to remote schools to do the never ending M$ updates, they can boot the linux kernel and download a new partition of changes. The linux kernel is unaffected and
That's obvious. Anyway I have written to a kernel hacker friend of mine (Tim Riker) and asked him for an opinion, since my programming experience is limited to userland apps. The closest I have come to hacking the Linux kernel was when I modified pthreads to work properly with MySQL. Up to September 2001 I was a member of the MySQL core development team. I have only ever once looked at Novel Netware. That once was enough for me. Back to the subject. You can't integate a userland app into the kernel, so I am mystifed by what your Tech support guys have been telling you they
can then ghost the machine and pump it out to all the others on site usig Zend.
Zend? We are talking about the same Zend which is behind PHP. Zend is just a web application server so what has this got to do with the price of kippers :) I think somebody is taking the Michael
As I said earlier, I hope this is a temprorary measure as I will eliminate M$ from the school as soon as I can.
There is a multitude of FTP servers available for Linux. proFTP is the easiest the setup. If you can set up Apache you can set up proFTP, since the config files are almost identical. pureFTP is the most secure, so the choice is yours
Regards John
Regards John
[snip]
Hi Paul, It strikes me that there is a case for using LTSP to solve this problem. It will mean that updating a single application server will update each of the clients. There are several ways of synchonising various servers, and I guess that some sort of sftp transfer would work. We are looking at cascading the the application servers at the moment. ===== rgds, Richard Rothwell -------------------------------------------------------------------- rind (n) acronym for 'rind is not defined' ________________________________________________________________________ Download Yahoo! Messenger now for a chance to win Live At Knebworth DVDs http://www.yahoo.co.uk/robbiewilliams
Paul Taylor wrote:
Hi all:
this space). However, they would like to modify the 2.4.18 kernel they use so that it can run a tftp server so that they can load some new files onto
Are you sure you mean tftp? This is really quite a horrible protocol, and only ever really used for transferring files when netbooting. Also, there is no point modifying the kernel to do this - you can get the userland tftp server as an RPM. FTP is still better to do this - there are plenty of FTP servers around (don't use wu-ftpd; it's full of security holes; I'm a happy user of vsftpd). Dan
Paul Taylor wrote:
Hi all:
this space). However, they would like to modify the 2.4.18 kernel they use so that it can run a tftp server so that they can load some new files onto
Are you sure you mean tftp? I wasn't really sure what I meant at the time but have a better idea now, I
On Saturday 29 Nov 2003 11:52 am, you wrote: think. The network manager is very good with Novel and has been using it for years. Part of the Novel kit is a customised linux distro which is used to deploy ghosted partitions across a network. They use a customised linux distro to partition a new computer with 100MB for the linux distro and xGB for the doze one. They boot into the linux partition and run a customised lilo which sets up the device to contact the Novel server which then dumps a doze ghost onto the machine. They then boot all other machines in the classroom to use this as the master and copy a "working" XP onto all the machines. This all works well but it is dependent on being part of the same network. The school maintains 8 primaries locally so they have to go out and do the process machine by machie with the existing setup. They have no knowledge of linux other than a few commands they use at the bash shell with the customised distro they use with Novel. I assume they would like to have tftp or ftp as part of the distro (they said kernel but now I know they meant distro). That way, they could take all the multitude of patches for xp on a cd with the linuc distro and then reload all the machines on site with the nnew "improved" version of xp. Does that make more sense? As I said, I am working in the background to get ltsp working, with the network manager's support, but I have a full teaching load so it will not be tomorrow.
This is really quite a horrible protocol, and only ever really used for transferring files when netbooting. Also, there is no point modifying the kernel to do this - you can get the userland tftp server as an RPM.
FTP is still better to do this - there are plenty of FTP servers around (don't use wu-ftpd; it's full of security holes; I'm a happy user of vsftpd).
I will try this out, thanks
Dan Paul
Firstly appols for drifting off topic but I think you may be interested in this .... http://www.thekjs.essex.sch.uk/yates/images/pic.jpg Basically for every 2 openoffice.org CDs they sell they will donate 1 copy to Malaysia to help improve the kids education over there which is all very nice. They only cost 2 quid each and p&p is the cost of a first class stamp for 1-5 CDs, 2xFCS for 6-10 CDs and then waived for 10+. If you wish to order or have further questions then his email address is pburgess@wilmslowhigh.cheshire.sch.uk The CDs contain windows, linux and solaris versions of openoffice.org 1.1 and there is spare capacity for anything you want really. He can add curriculum resources if you are a teacher and are passing / selling these Cds on to kids. I have no affiliation with this project or the school or the teacher other than I think it deserves to be supported :-) Thanks Darren Smith
On Sat, 2003-11-29 at 13:53, Darren Smith wrote:
Firstly appols for drifting off topic but I think you may be interested in this ....
http://www.thekjs.essex.sch.uk/yates/images/pic.jpg
Basically for every 2 openoffice.org CDs they sell they will donate 1 copy to Malaysia to help improve the kids education over there which is all very nice. They only cost 2 quid each and p&p is the cost of a first class stamp for 1-5 CDs, 2xFCS for 6-10 CDs and then waived for 10+.
If you wish to order or have further questions then his email address is pburgess@wilmslowhigh.cheshire.sch.uk
The CDs contain windows, linux and solaris versions of openoffice.org 1.1 and there is spare capacity for anything you want really. He can add curriculum resources if you are a teacher and are passing / selling these Cds on to kids.
I have no affiliation with this project or the school or the teacher other than I think it deserves to be supported :-)
There is also a project to get OO.o discs into libraries so that people
can borrow them, copy them or install them. I think every library in
Scotland now has an OO.o disc courtesy of ob Kerr who is running the
project. He has sent me quite a few discs in nicely produced DVD cases.
If anyone wants one to put in their school library let me know and I'll
send one. Its entirely free.
--
ian
participants (6)
-
Dan Kolb
-
Darren Smith
-
ian
-
john@rygannon.com
-
Paul Taylor
-
Richard Rothwell