[opensuse-buildservice] SR's not being shown on web site
Something is funny about the OBS website not showing submitreq's. First, I click on my home page, and it says: Involved Requests (0) archie172 is not involved in any requests See all other requests Other requests I then click on "Other Requests". It defaults to: Display [ all ] requests in state [ new or review ]. No requests are displayed. Then I change "all" to "submit". Now two requests are displayed. I change "submit" back to "all" and the two requests are still displayed. I reload the page and no requests are displayed. Something ain't right... -Archie -- Archie L. Cobbs -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+owner@opensuse.org
On 04/20/2013 06:09 PM, Archie Cobbs wrote:
Something is funny about the OBS website not showing submitreq's.
Same problem here, probably the UI has some sort of internal caching that has gone belly up. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+owner@opensuse.org
Am 21.04.2013 05:46, schrieb Cristian Rodríguez:
On 04/20/2013 06:09 PM, Archie Cobbs wrote:
Something is funny about the OBS website not showing submitreq's.
Same problem here, probably the UI has some sort of internal caching that has gone belly up.
This has nothing to do with caching according to my understand. What happens is that the default of the page is to show requests that need work. If I go the page, the browser asks https://build.opensuse.org/home/requests?user=coolo If I select type all manually (which is displayed as default), the browser asks: https://build.opensuse.org/request/list?states=new%2Creview&types=all&user=coolo So I guess the UI needs to show that the default is "needs work", so you can switch to all and expect what actually happens. Greetings, Stephan -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+owner@opensuse.org
Stephan Kulow
Am 21.04.2013 05:46, schrieb Cristian Rodríguez:
On 04/20/2013 06:09 PM, Archie Cobbs wrote:
Something is funny about the OBS website not showing submitreq's.
Same problem here, probably the UI has some sort of internal caching that has gone belly up.
This has nothing to do with caching according to my understand. What happens is that the default of the page is to show requests that need work.
If I go the page, the browser asks https://build.opensuse.org/home/requests?user=coolo
If I select type all manually (which is displayed as default), the browser asks:
https://build.opensuse.org/request/list?states=new%2Creview&types=all&user=coolo
So I guess the UI needs to show that the default is "needs work", so you can switch to all and expect what actually happens.
Greetings, Stephan
I'm on the it's broken side. It seems that when you first click other requests you get partial info. Using the pull-down causes a refresh that fixes it. But I've seen other times when gets out of sync. Greg -- Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+owner@opensuse.org
El 21/04/13 09:32, Greg Freemyer escribió:
I'm on the it's broken side. It seems that when you first click other requests you get partial info. Using the pull-down causes a refresh that fixes it.
Yes, explicitey refreshing with the pull and down menu here workarounds the problem. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+owner@opensuse.org
The issues reported below are still there. Are there any plans to fix them?
Previous discussion is here:
http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-buildservice/2013-04/msg00119.html
Note there are two distinct bugs:
(1) The main page says "not involved in any requests" when that's not
actually true
(2) Pulldown inconsistency on the SR page (none shown when "all" selected)
Issues (1) and (2) are both problematic because they can incorrectly
lead someone to believe there is no outstanding work to do (either by
themselves or by someone else) when in fact there really is work for
someone to do.
Thanks,
-Archie
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Archie Cobbs
participants (4)
-
Archie Cobbs -
Cristian Rodríguez -
Greg Freemyer -
Stephan Kulow