Moved from Re: [opensuse-factory] Trust/rating system WAS: GNOME in 10.1
On Sat, 4 Mar 2006, Henne Vogelsang wrote:
On Saturday, March 04, 2006 at 15:06:04, James Ogley wrote:
Now we are getting in the realm of the still not even defined trust/rating system. * Trusted 99% * Quality 95% * Downloaded more then 100 times * Some other attribute 70% * Some other attribute 50% Of course you could share these "settings" with other users of the build service and they could use pascal's stable settings too.
Hey, that would be pretty cool, is there any info on when we might see this happen? (Apologies if I've just missed a reference to it)
Once you and me and all the other peepz that hang around here make it happen! :)
We should take this to the opensuse-buildservice mailinglist and discuss it there.
I really like this idea as well. I wonder how this rating system will
work. How is quality and trust being defined. Also is the XML structure
discussed on opensuse-factory going to be used?
I think the structure could be modified to be used every where. That is
once it is defined and we realy define/rate quality.
quality != trust
but some individuals trust and quality are higher. They are related but
different.
--
Boyd Gerber
Once you and me and all the other peepz that hang around here make it happen! :)
Well lets make it happen people, come on come on! First things first - are any infrastructure changes needed at the Novell end? Secondly, what do we do to get it on? -- James Ogley james@usr-local-bin.org Packages for SUSE: http://usr-local-bin.org/rpms Make Poverty History: http://makepovertyhistory.org
Am Saturday 04 March 2006 21:26 schrieb James Ogley:
Once you and me and all the other peepz that hang around here make it happen! :)
Well lets make it happen people, come on come on!
First things first - are any infrastructure changes needed at the Novell end?
Secondly, what do we do to get it on?
We do not yet work on the user/trust system. So you could download the web frontend and start to implement your version ;) However, a bit more detailed plan would be usefull to have before. In general, the system should depend on the user logins and have an effect on the built package repositories. It should offer the possibility to get voted by other users/developers and it should offer the way to sign a contract (which proves the identity and the contractor accepts the package building rules) to get voted higher. bye adrian -- Adrian Schroeter SUSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nuernberg, Germany email: adrian@suse.de
Am Saturday 04 March 2006 21:26 schrieb James Ogley:
Once you and me and all the other peepz that hang around here make it happen! :)
Well lets make it happen people, come on come on!
First things first - are any infrastructure changes needed at the Novell end?
Secondly, what do we do to get it on?
We do not yet work on the user/trust system. I would not second that without limitations ;-) We have a user model, a permission system and user management already. And we want to keep
On Monday 06 March 2006 08:42, Adrian Schröter wrote: that one. It is based on activeRBAC.
So you could download the web frontend and start to implement your version ;) That's of course true. But please use the existing user model in the frontend.
Thanks, Klaas
-- Klaas Freitag Novell - SUSE R&D - Internal Tools
Am Saturday 04 March 2006 20:04 schrieb Boyd Lynn Gerber:
On Sat, 4 Mar 2006, Henne Vogelsang wrote:
On Saturday, March 04, 2006 at 15:06:04, James Ogley wrote:
Now we are getting in the realm of the still not even defined trust/rating system. * Trusted 99% * Quality 95% * Downloaded more then 100 times * Some other attribute 70% * Some other attribute 50% Of course you could share these "settings" with other users of the build service and they could use pascal's stable settings too.
Hey, that would be pretty cool, is there any info on when we might see this happen? (Apologies if I've just missed a reference to it)
Once you and me and all the other peepz that hang around here make it happen! :)
We should take this to the opensuse-buildservice mailinglist and discuss it there.
I really like this idea as well. I wonder how this rating system will work. How is quality and trust being defined. Also is the XML structure discussed on opensuse-factory going to be used?
I think the structure could be modified to be used every where. That is once it is defined and we realy define/rate quality.
quality != trust
but some individuals trust and quality are higher. They are related but different.
Right, a highly trustable package could package an experimental package. So, in short, the trust level always depends on the people. The quality depends on the package. A trust rating system and a quality rating system are IMHO two independend systems. bye adrian -- Adrian Schroeter SUSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nuernberg, Germany email: adrian@suse.de
participants (4)
-
Adrian Schröter -
Boyd Lynn Gerber -
James Ogley -
Klaas Freitag