[Bug 307784] New: Lenovo T60p network card problems (e1000)
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=307784 Summary: Lenovo T60p network card problems (e1000) Product: openSUSE 10.2 Version: Final Platform: x86-64 OS/Version: openSUSE 10.2 Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Kernel AssignedTo: kernel-maintainers@forge.provo.novell.com ReportedBy: mhoppe@novell.com QAContact: qa@suse.de Found By: IS&T I have some network issues with my T60p (Model 8742-C3G). The (lan) network traffic stucks sometimes, especially if I enable the wireless kill-switch. The network is 100MBit FDX and I've tested different peers. An example with kill-switch off: 64 bytes from neo.suse.de (149.44.168.170): icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.701 ms 64 bytes from neo.suse.de (149.44.168.170): icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=6.89 ms 64 bytes from neo.suse.de (149.44.168.170): icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=2.70 ms 64 bytes from neo.suse.de (149.44.168.170): icmp_seq=4 ttl=64 time=8.63 ms 64 bytes from neo.suse.de (149.44.168.170): icmp_seq=5 ttl=64 time=8.56 ms 64 bytes from neo.suse.de (149.44.168.170): icmp_seq=6 ttl=64 time=19.8 ms 64 bytes from neo.suse.de (149.44.168.170): icmp_seq=7 ttl=64 time=10.2 ms 64 bytes from neo.suse.de (149.44.168.170): icmp_seq=8 ttl=64 time=8.60 ms 64 bytes from neo.suse.de (149.44.168.170): icmp_seq=9 ttl=64 time=124 ms 64 bytes from neo.suse.de (149.44.168.170): icmp_seq=10 ttl=64 time=39.3 ms 64 bytes from neo.suse.de (149.44.168.170): icmp_seq=11 ttl=64 time=2.16 ms 64 bytes from neo.suse.de (149.44.168.170): icmp_seq=12 ttl=64 time=8.08 ms 64 bytes from neo.suse.de (149.44.168.170): icmp_seq=13 ttl=64 time=5.86 ms 64 bytes from neo.suse.de (149.44.168.170): icmp_seq=14 ttl=64 time=3.69 ms 64 bytes from neo.suse.de (149.44.168.170): icmp_seq=15 ttl=64 time=9.62 ms 64 bytes from neo.suse.de (149.44.168.170): icmp_seq=16 ttl=64 time=5.94 ms 64 bytes from neo.suse.de (149.44.168.170): icmp_seq=17 ttl=64 time=1.74 ms 64 bytes from neo.suse.de (149.44.168.170): icmp_seq=18 ttl=64 time=7.66 ms 64 bytes from neo.suse.de (149.44.168.170): icmp_seq=19 ttl=64 time=3.60 ms 64 bytes from neo.suse.de (149.44.168.170): icmp_seq=20 ttl=64 time=9.40 ms 64 bytes from neo.suse.de (149.44.168.170): icmp_seq=21 ttl=64 time=5.21 ms 64 bytes from neo.suse.de (149.44.168.170): icmp_seq=22 ttl=64 time=1.14 ms 64 bytes from neo.suse.de (149.44.168.170): icmp_seq=23 ttl=64 time=7.43 ms 64 bytes from neo.suse.de (149.44.168.170): icmp_seq=24 ttl=64 time=3.37 ms 64 bytes from neo.suse.de (149.44.168.170): icmp_seq=25 ttl=64 time=2.05 ms 64 bytes from neo.suse.de (149.44.168.170): icmp_seq=26 ttl=64 time=4.98 ms Now with kill-switch on: 64 bytes from neo.suse.de (149.44.168.170): icmp_seq=30 ttl=64 time=8.83 ms 64 bytes from neo.suse.de (149.44.168.170): icmp_seq=31 ttl=64 time=16.2 ms 64 bytes from neo.suse.de (149.44.168.170): icmp_seq=32 ttl=64 time=19.0 ms 64 bytes from neo.suse.de (149.44.168.170): icmp_seq=33 ttl=64 time=17.5 ms 64 bytes from neo.suse.de (149.44.168.170): icmp_seq=34 ttl=64 time=129 ms 64 bytes from neo.suse.de (149.44.168.170): icmp_seq=35 ttl=64 time=749 ms 64 bytes from neo.suse.de (149.44.168.170): icmp_seq=36 ttl=64 time=467 ms 64 bytes from neo.suse.de (149.44.168.170): icmp_seq=37 ttl=64 time=63.9 ms 64 bytes from neo.suse.de (149.44.168.170): icmp_seq=38 ttl=64 time=3.78 ms 64 bytes from neo.suse.de (149.44.168.170): icmp_seq=39 ttl=64 time=623 ms 64 bytes from neo.suse.de (149.44.168.170): icmp_seq=40 ttl=64 time=524 ms 64 bytes from neo.suse.de (149.44.168.170): icmp_seq=41 ttl=64 time=369 ms 64 bytes from neo.suse.de (149.44.168.170): icmp_seq=42 ttl=64 time=516 ms 64 bytes from neo.suse.de (149.44.168.170): icmp_seq=43 ttl=64 time=451 ms 64 bytes from neo.suse.de (149.44.168.170): icmp_seq=44 ttl=64 time=508 ms 64 bytes from neo.suse.de (149.44.168.170): icmp_seq=45 ttl=64 time=584 ms 64 bytes from neo.suse.de (149.44.168.170): icmp_seq=46 ttl=64 time=415 ms 64 bytes from neo.suse.de (149.44.168.170): icmp_seq=47 ttl=64 time=0.604 ms 64 bytes from neo.suse.de (149.44.168.170): icmp_seq=48 ttl=64 time=266 ms 64 bytes from neo.suse.de (149.44.168.170): icmp_seq=49 ttl=64 time=116 ms 64 bytes from neo.suse.de (149.44.168.170): icmp_seq=50 ttl=64 time=336 ms Same machine in Windows and I have always max 1 ms. I've tested another machine on the same LAN cable and it shows max 1.2 ms. Wireless on this machine works without problems. Some informations: cat /proc/interrupts CPU0 CPU1 0: 463311 0 IO-APIC-edge timer 1: 5291 0 IO-APIC-edge i8042 8: 1 0 IO-APIC-edge rtc 9: 410411 0 IO-APIC-level acpi 12: 33587 0 IO-APIC-edge i8042 14: 16393 0 IO-APIC-edge ide0 66: 21404 0 PCI-MSI libata 74: 175495 0 IO-APIC-level ehci_hcd:usb1, uhci_hcd:usb5 82: 119323 0 IO-APIC-level HDA Intel, uhci_hcd:usb3, ipw3945 90: 0 0 IO-APIC-level uhci_hcd:usb4 98: 13395 0 PCI-MSI eth0 169: 2 0 IO-APIC-level uhci_hcd:usb2, yenta, fglrx NMI: 56 31 LOC: 463212 463029 ERR: 0 MIS: 0 modinfo e1000 version: 7.1.9-k4-NAPI vermagic: 2.6.18.8-0.5-default SMP mod_unload gcc-4.1 supported: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=307784#c4
--- Comment #4 from Matthias Boettger
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=307784
Karsten Keil
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=307784#c11
Adrian Schröter
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=307784
User jnelson-suse@jamponi.net added comment
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=307784#c12
Jon Nelson
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=307784
User kkeil@novell.com added comment
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=307784#c13
Karsten Keil
participants (1)
-
bugzilla_noreply@novell.com