https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=341309 Martin Mrazik changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|bnc-team-screening@forge.provo.novell.com |jsrain@novell.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=341309 User duwe@novell.com added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=341309#c3 Torsten Duwe changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |duwe@novell.com Status|NEEDINFO |NEW Info Provider|duwe@novell.com | --- Comment #3 from Torsten Duwe 2008-01-02 06:00:06 MST --- grub handles no kernel parameters besides "vga=", as that one implies binary patching of the bzImage. This is a red herring. y2log_bootloader shows grub is installed on both parts of /dev/md1, /dev/sd{a,b}2 that should be. stage1.5 is found but never used. You should install a generic MBR on both disks, to disable the leftover stage1.5, where ever this came from. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=341309 Stanislav Visnovsky changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |visnov@novell.com Component|Installation |Booting -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=341309 User volker3204@paradise.net.nz added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=341309#c6 --- Comment #6 from Volker Kuhlmann 2008-05-20 14:33:24 MST --- Jozef, please note that I already had set the boot loader location to MBR explicitly, and it has *NOT* fixed the problem. I always set it to MBR, as the alternatives suggested by yast always lead to a non-booting system and have done so for more X.0 SUSE releases than I want to count right now (yes I bugzilla'd it). New with beta2 and beta3 is that even explicitly setting grub location to MBR no longer produces a system which boots. Thanks for looking at it - it'd be nice to be able to say that 11.x actually works on a raid1 without calling a mechanic... :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=341309 User locilka@novell.com added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=341309#c8 --- Comment #8 from Lukas Ocilka 2008-05-28 05:58:54 MDT --- Created an attachment (id=218581) --> (https://bugzilla.novell.com/attachment.cgi?id=218581) grub configuration -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=341309 User juhliarik@novell.com added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=341309#c10 Jozef Uhliarik changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED --- Comment #10 from Jozef Uhliarik 2008-06-26 09:08:11 MDT --- yast2-bootloader 2.17.1 includes better detection for analyse MBR if soft-raid is used. IMO there is necessary changes in perl-Bootloader see bug #398356 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.