[Bug 860083] New: /sbin/service does not consider service alias links
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=860083 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=860083#c0 Summary: /sbin/service does not consider service alias links Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Factory Version: 13.2 Milestone 0 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Basesystem AssignedTo: lnussel@suse.com ReportedBy: mt@suse.com QAContact: qa-bugs@suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- According to opensuse packaging guidelines "If you only support a service file, link rcXXX to /sbin/service so that rcXXX continues to work", I've created a link to /sbin/service in sysconfig: /sbin/rcnetwork -> /sbin/service but it does not work properly, as network.service and syslog.service, ... is a link to the effective service and not listed in the query: # bash -x /sbin/rcnetwork status + sd_booted [...] + systemctl --full --no-legend --no-pager --type=service --all list-units + grep -q '^network.service' + return 1 + echo 'rcnetwork: no such service network' rcnetwork: no such service network + exit 1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=860083
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=860083#c1
--- Comment #1 from Marius Tomaschewski
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=860083
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=860083#c2
--- Comment #2 from Marius Tomaschewski
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=860083
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=860083#c3
--- Comment #3 from Bernhard Wiedemann
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=860083
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=860083#c4
Ludwig Nussel
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=860083
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=860083#c5
--- Comment #5 from Bernhard Wiedemann
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=860083
--- Comment #9 from Swamp Workflow Management
participants (1)
-
bugzilla_noreply@novell.com