http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1009472 http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1009472#c2 --- Comment #2 from Michel Normand --- Note: Since a while the openQA server had an incorrect setup of ppc64le-multipath machine definition (1). That explain why this bug failure was not reported before for ppc64le. This should appear on futur new test run on this server. (1) === (10:56:06) michel_mno: There is an error in openQA database about ppc64le multipath machine http://paste.opensuse.org/view/raw/16432658 MULTIPATH1 is set, but should be MULTIPATH (10:56:06) michel_mno: the templates is correct in git, the database has to be modified (I do not have admin access) (10:58:03) okurz: michel_mno: I updated the machine definition for ppc64le-multipath === https://openqa.opensuse.org/admin/machines ppc64le-multipath qemu MULTIPATH1=1 <= this has to be replaced by MULTIPATH=1 NOVIDEO=1 OFW=1 QEMUCPU=host QEMUCPUS=8 QEMURAM=4096 QEMUTHREADS=8 WORKER_CLASS=qemu_ppc64le === -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1009472 http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1009472#c4 Dinar Valeev changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |k0da@opensuse.org --- Comment #4 from Dinar Valeev --- It seems that we just need to rebuild a whole tree against recent rpm.. It was kbd-legacy, then kernel-firmware, now netpbm.. All are cured by rebuilding those packages. (I'm not certain about kbd-legacy though as Andreas did something to it.) Anyway rebuild is in progress.. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1009472 Michal Suchanek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |msuchanek@suse.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1009472 http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1009472#c7 --- Comment #7 from Michel Normand --- (In reply to Michel Normand from comment #6)

same error with Snapshot 20161115 after rebuild as reported in https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/305788

in this retry same error of rpm command, cpio rename. === 2016-11-16 01:50:42 <1> install(3311) [zypp++] ExternalProgram.cc(start_program):249 Executing 'rpm' '--root' '/mnt' '--dbpath' '/var/lib/rpm' '-U' '--percent' '--noglob' '--force' '--nodeps' '--' '/mnt/var/cache/zypp/packages/openSUSE-20161115-0/suse/noarch/kbd-legacy-2.0.3-1.2.noarch.rpm' 2016-11-16 01:50:42 <1> install(3311) [zypp++] ExternalProgram.cc(start_program):412 pid 4862 launched 2016-11-16 01:50:42 <1> install(3311) [zypp++] ExternalProgram.cc(checkStatus):506 Pid 4862 exited with status 1 2016-11-16 01:50:42 <5> install(3311) [zypp] Exception.cc(log):137 RpmDb.cc(doInstallPackage):2043 THROW: Subprocess failed. Error: RPM failed: error: unpacking of archive failed on file /usr/share/kbd/keymaps/legacy/include/compose.latin4: cpio: rename === -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1009472 http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1009472#c9 --- Comment #9 from Dinar Valeev --- this test defaults to HDDSIZEGB=10 To exclude btrfs, I'd run the same test but with ext3/ext4 fs. There is definitely something wrong with disk in this setup. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1009472 http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1009472#c11 --- Comment #11 from Michel Normand --- (In reply to Michel Normand from comment #8)

Created attachment 702238 [details] openqa_save_y2logs_failure.png

* in previous failing conditions default disk size is used (qcow2 10GB) * on my local openqa server (because I am not authorized to issue openQA client cmd on main instance) * if setup HDDSIZEGB=40 then still rpm cpio rename error. * if setup HDDSIZEGB=80 then no more rpm cpio rename error. so assumption of comment #3 by Josef Reidinger is valid, and yast2 ultimately stuck with "Saving bootloader configuration" But openQA unable to capture y2log because save_y2log failed as reported by this openqa_save_y2logs_failure.png

The hung condition at "Saving bootloader configuration" is tracked by new bug https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1011529 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1009472 http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1009472#c12 Imobach Gonzalez Sosa changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |igonzalezsosa@suse.com Flags| |needinfo?(k0da@opensuse.org | |) --- Comment #12 from Imobach Gonzalez Sosa --- Hi Dinar, What's expected from the YaST team? It looks a problem with Btrfs and/or multipath set-up. How can we help? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1009472 http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1009472#c14 --- Comment #14 from Michel Normand --- investigation blocked by new bug https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1012825 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1009472 http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1009472#c15 --- Comment #15 from Michel Normand --- I need suggestion to continue investigation as per following status. Current_Status: * The failure is specific to disk multipath test and btrfs for TW PowerPC the reported error in y2log is "cpio: rename" error * No failure for Leap 42.2 * Unable to recreate the failure without openQA env. * Not same failure in ext4 FS in place of btrfs. * The error reported by Yast is any package installation failure and the y2log reports a "cpio: rename" error with no error number. * the "cpio: rename" string is related to error from fsmRename fct in lib/fsm.c: Reported by rpm via the zypp traces from libzypp (for ExternalProgram.cc, Exception.cc, RpmDb.cc) the last error is reported by rpm psm.c rpmpsmUnpack fct as error from rpmPackageFilesInstall the related string from emsg (output of rpmfileStrerror) string "cpio: rename" is build in this rpmfileStrerror by decoding of RPMERR_RENAME_FAILED RC Summary of related source lines: === ./rpm-4.12.0.1/lib/psm.c:671: fsmrc = rpmPackageFilesInstall(psm->ts, psm->te, psm->files, === fsmrc = rpmPackageFilesInstall(psm->ts, psm->te, psm->files, psm, &failedFile); emsg = rpmfileStrerror(fsmrc); rpmlog(RPMLOG_ERR, _("unpacking of archive failed%s%s: %s\n"), (failedFile != NULL ? _(" on file ") : ""), (failedFile != NULL ? failedFile : ""), emsg); === ./rpm-4.12.0.1/lib/rpmfi.c:2111:char * rpmfileStrerror(int rc) ./rpm-4.12.0.1/lib/fsm.c:535: static int fsmRename(const char *opath, const char *path) ./rpm-4.12.0.1/lib/rpmarchive.h RPMERR_RENAME_FAILED = -32774, === -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1009472 http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1009472#c17 Michel Normand changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |IN_PROGRESS --- Comment #17 from Michel Normand --- (In reply to Michel Normand from comment #16)

In my openQA instance there is no such failure if eatmydata package is removed ! This is used in os-autoinst qemu backend: === backend/qemu.pm:719: unshift(@params, "/usr/bin/eatmydata") if (-e "/usr/bin/eatmydata"); ===

Do we really need this eatmydata call ? that seems to really eat data.

wait for openQA update with PR https://github.com/os-autoinst/os-autoinst/pull/660 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1009472 Michel Normand changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|needinfo?(k0da@opensuse.org | |) | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1009472 http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1009472#c21 --- Comment #21 from Michel Normand --- as suggested I am creating a new issue https://progress.opensuse.org/issues/15548 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1009472 http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1009472#c23 Michel Normand changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|UPSTREAM |DUPLICATE --- Comment #23 from Michel Normand --- after power8 worker update as per issue https://progress.opensuse.org/issues/15770 set this bug as duplicate of new boo#1018262 to continue investigation from status summary of comment #15 *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1018262 *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.