[Bug 238770] New: linker errors on upgrade / provide libraries with different linker names for backward compatibility
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=238770 Summary: linker errors on upgrade / provide libraries with different linker names for backward compatibility Product: SUSE Linux 10.1 Version: Final Platform: i686 OS/Version: SuSE Linux 10.1 Status: NEW Severity: Major Priority: P5 - None Component: Maintenance AssignedTo: bnc-team-screening@forge.provo.novell.com ReportedBy: estellnb@lycos.at QAContact: qa@suse.de It is a permanent problem that several applications will have to be removed on updates due to unresolved dependencies. This could be improved easily by providing different linker versions of the same library instantaneously. Update packages within the same distribution could carry along elder linker versions of the upgraded library. Otherwise I would suggest a 'reduced' installation mode for just installing the dynamic library binaries so that multiple linker versions of the same library can coexist as part of different rpms at the same time. Sometimes the package managment system does not recognize that a library update will break a dependency and refrains from removing dependent applications:
gedit gedit: error while loading shared libraries: libgailutil.so.17: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory elm:~> locate libgailutil.so /opt/gnome/lib/libgailutil.so /opt/gnome/lib/libgailutil.so.18 /opt/gnome/lib/libgailutil.so.18.0.1
In such a case (good luck) I can manually unload libgailutil.so.17:
cd / rpm2cpio /media/dvd/suse/i586/gail-1.8.8-15.i586.rpm|cpio -iv '*.so.*' ldconfig 'reduced' installation outside the rpm database
Sometimes even worse the library interface becomes subject to incompatible changes without assigning a new linker name. So it happened to the set/longjmp functions of /lib/libc.so.6 between SuSE-10.0 and SuSE-10.1. As a consequence of this all Modula-3 related programs crash on startup under SuSE-10.1 instead of returning a linker error. example: cvsup-16.1h-175.i586.rpm see also: Modula-3 Mailing list 11.01.2007 Why is it not called /lib/libc.so.7? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=238770 ------- Comment #1 from estellnb@lycos.at 2007-01-25 08:27 MST ------- Created an attachment (id=115109) --> (https://bugzilla.novell.com/attachment.cgi?id=115109&action=view) zmd logs of gnome update -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=238770 ------- Comment #2 from estellnb@lycos.at 2007-01-25 08:31 MST ------- It would be a nice thing if it was possible to decide whether to keep or uninstall packages which have dependencies which conflict with the intended updates: i.e. to find out about the packages causing the conflict and to automatically unselect them for the next update run if the user wishes this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=238770 ------- Comment #3 from estellnb@lycos.at 2007-01-25 08:34 MST ------- *** Bug 238767 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=238770 mhorvath@novell.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|bnc-team- |jsuchome@novell.com |screening@forge.provo.novell| |.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=238770 kkaempf@novell.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |WONTFIX ------- Comment #5 from kkaempf@novell.com 2007-01-29 04:21 MST ------- Older library versions are provided as '-compat' packages. However, we cannot do this generally because its a huge effort. Keeping older library versions installed will break in most cases, since other (dependant) libraries have changed too. If needed, the openSuSE build service could provide means to have older library packages. In the above example (gedit), please run "rpm -V gedit" to check if the gedit package reports any broken depenencies. The glibc package is controlled by upstream maintainers and the LSB project. You might report it as a separate bug, but there's not much we can do about it. -> closing as 'cantfix' (regrettably, bugzilla only offers 'wontfix') -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
participants (1)
-
bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com