http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1032092 http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1032092#c2 Stefan Hundhammer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |WONTFIX --- Comment #2 from Stefan Hundhammer --- To start with, that controller's firmware seems to have a different idea how to create a correct partition table than the Linux "parted" command; from the y2log: 2016-11-09 12:46:02 <1> hpsrv058(4948) [libstorage] SystemCmd.cc(execute):143 SystemCmd Executing: "/usr/sbin/parted -s '/dev/sda' unit cyl print unit s print" Warning: /dev/sda contains GPT signatures, indicating that it has a GPT table. However, it does not have a valid fake msdos partition table, as it should. Perhaps it was corrupted -- possibly by a program that doesn't understand GPT partition tables. Or perhaps you deleted the GPT table, and are now using an msdos partition table. Is this a GPT partition table? Error: The backup GPT table is corrupt, but the primary appears OK, so that will be used. Model: HP LOGICAL VOLUME (scsi) Disk /dev/sda: 17844cyl Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B BIOS cylinder,head,sector geometry: 17844,255,63. Each cylinder is 8225kB. Partition Table: gpt Disk Flags: Number Start End Size File system Name Flags 1 0cyl 0cyl 0cyl fat16 boot 5 0cyl 32cyl 31cyl fat16 6 32cyl 64cyl 31cyl fat16 7 64cyl 78cyl 14cyl 8 78cyl 114cyl 36cyl fat16 9 114cyl 441cyl 326cyl fat16 2 441cyl 963cyl 522cyl fat16 3 963cyl 17844cyl 16881cyl Model: HP LOGICAL VOLUME (scsi) Disk /dev/sda: 286677120s Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B Partition Table: gpt Disk Flags: Number Start End Size File system Name Flags 1 64s 8191s 8128s fat16 boot 5 8224s 520191s 511968s fat16 6 520224s 1032191s 511968s fat16 7 1032224s 1257471s 225248s 8 1257504s 1843199s 585696s fat16 9 1843200s 7086079s 5242880s fat16 2 7086080s 15472639s 8386560s fat16 3 15472640s 286677086s 271204447s --------------------------------------------------------- With all those smallish fat16 partitions, the automated storage proposal decides that it cannot make any sensible suggestion, so you get that "do it manually" message. Very likely you could still choose the "wipe the entire disk" option and let it do a proposal based on that. But short of that, there is no way to decide in an automated way what to delete on that crowded disk. Verdict: The message is correct. There is no way to do an automated storage proposal here. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.