https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1213477 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1213477#c1 --- Comment #1 from Johannes Meixner --- First and foremost: SUSE or openSUSE never developed Gutenprint (or any other basic printing software). We provide printing software "as is" from upstream. As far as I know this is unavoidable for a Gutenprint major version upgrade because /usr/sbin/cups-genppdupdate (which is run as RPM post install script) cannot properly regenerate Gutenprint PPD files for existing print queues (i.e. what there is in /etc/cups/ppd/*.ppd) for a Gutenprint major version upgrade. So for a Gutenprint major version upgrade you have to manually re-create the print queues which use Gutenprint as printer driver. When Gutenprint 5.2 PPD files have (long line shown wrapped) ------------------------------------------------------------- *cupsFilter: "application/vnd.cups-raster 100 rastertogutenprint.5.2" ------------------------------------------------------------- versus Gutenprint 5.3 PPD files that have ------------------------------------------------------------- *cupsFilter: "application/vnd.cups-raster 100 rastertogutenprint.5.3" ------------------------------------------------------------- this is very likely intentional by Gutenprint upstream because in general the contents of PPD files must match the specific printer driver software where they belong to. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1213477 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1213477#c2 Johannes Meixner changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|--- |WONTFIX Status|NEW |RESOLVED --- Comment #2 from Johannes Meixner --- I close it as WONTFIX which means in this case: "The problem described is an issue for the user but it cannot be fixed by openSUSE." So alternatively it might be closed as UPSTREAM which means: "The responsibility for the bug lies upstream." Because I think things behave as intended by Gutenprint upstream it could be also closed as INVALID which would mean in this case: "The problem described is an issue for the user but things behave as intended by the upstream developers." Cf. https://bugzilla.suse.com/page.cgi?id=status_resolution_matrix.html -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.