[Bug 721739] New: Brightness control does only work in dark ranges
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=721739 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=721739#c0 Summary: Brightness control does only work in dark ranges Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE 12.1 Version: Beta 1 Platform: i686 OS/Version: SuSE Other Status: NEW Severity: Critical Priority: P5 - None Component: Basesystem AssignedTo: bnc-team-screening@forge.provo.novell.com ReportedBy: thorsten@tws-home.de QAContact: qa@suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:7.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/7.0 I tested this on the gnome live CD copied to an USB stick. Usually the brightness is controlled between 0% and 100% in 9 steps. Step 0 (0%) and Step 1 (~11%) work as expected. When I increase the brightness to Step 3 the display is extremely bright (looks like 100%). In step 4 the screen flickers with about 20Hz between 100% and 0%. When I continue increasing the brightness it takes a few seconds until the system freezes. This is reproducible on my Samsung NC10 to 100% for the flickering and about 50% for the freeze. With openSuse 11.4 everything works fine. How can I provide more detailed information? I left everything on default settings from the Live CD Gnome build 315 Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Start Gnome Live CD Build 315 on a netbook/notebook 2. Observe initial brightness that is set to 100% 3. Increase / Decrease brightness with hardware button (move the value to 0% Actual Results: Screen Flickers and System crashes. Expected Results: The brightness should have been changed to the entered step values. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=721739
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=721739#c1
Thorsten W. Schmidt
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=721739
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=721739#c2
Gary Ching-Pang Lin
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=721739
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=721739#c3
Thorsten W. Schmidt
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=721739
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=721739#c4
--- Comment #4 from Gary Ching-Pang Lin
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=721739
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=721739#c5
--- Comment #5 from Thorsten W. Schmidt
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=721739
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=721739#c6
--- Comment #6 from Gary Ching-Pang Lin
From the comment of bgo#660755[*]:
http://www.mjmwired.net/kernel/Documentation/ABI/stable/sysfs-class-backligh... The kernel ABI suggests that firmware control should be preferred to platform control. It seems that g-s-d used "samsung" instead of "acpi_video0". There are basically two bugs: 1. Wrong device: The priority of samsung is lower than acpi_video0 in the g-s-d backlight helper, so I think that gnome-rr chose the wrong device. 2. Bad backlight handling in samsung_laptop The "samsung" device is created by the kernel driver: "samsung_laptop", and it didn't set the correct brightness to the LCD panel. I'll dig gnome-rr and see what I can do. We should also file a bug against samsung_laptop. [*] https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=660755#c8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=721739
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=721739#c7
Gary Ching-Pang Lin
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=721739
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=721739#c8
Greg Kroah-Hartman
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=721739
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=721739#c9
--- Comment #9 from Gary Ching-Pang Lin
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=721739
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=721739#c10
Vincent Untz
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=721739
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=721739#c11
Jeff Mahoney
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=721739
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=721739#c
Swamp Workflow Management
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=721739
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=721739#c12
--- Comment #12 from Swamp Workflow Management
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=721739
Swamp Workflow Management
participants (1)
-
bugzilla_noreply@novell.com