https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=328486 Stephan Kulow changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rguenther@novell.com, coolo@novell.com AssignedTo|pth@novell.com |pbaudis@novell.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=328486#c2 Stephan Kulow changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |matz@novell.com --- Comment #2 from Stephan Kulow 2007-09-27 06:20:32 MST --- Perhaps we should check this isn't also on older distributions a problem ;( -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=328486#c4 --- Comment #4 from Dirk Mueller 2007-09-27 07:29:00 MST --- either this one: +Tue Aug 21 22:31:54 CEST 2007 - pbaudis@suse.cz + +- Reintroduce errorneously omitted AMD64 optimizations + (and fix them to compile again) + or this one: +------------------------------------------------------------------- +Fri Jul 13 18:27:49 CEST 2007 - schwab@suse.de + +- Update to head of glibc-2.6 branch. or this one: +Fri Aug 3 15:46:35 CEST 2007 - pbaudis@suse.cz + +- Remove the dynamic linker support for direct bindings (-Bdirect); + according to Michael Meeks, the performance improvement is too small +- Split timezone package to a separate physical package +- Update glibc to version 2.6.1 broke it -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=328486 Michael Matz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|pbaudis@novell.com |matz@novell.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=328486#c7 Detlef Reichelt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |detlef@die-mafia.de Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED Resolution|FIXED | --- Comment #7 from Detlef Reichelt 2007-10-08 03:15:46 MST --- This update breaks 32bit-apps on x86_64. :( After update, i couldn't start opera, seamonky (32bit) and moneyplex anymore. All apps die with "Segmentation fault". Downgrade of glibc-* and all 32bit-apps works fine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=328486#c9 --- Comment #9 from Michael Matz 2007-10-08 03:44:22 MST --- Once when programs crash, once when they work. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=328486#c11 --- Comment #11 from Michael Matz 2007-10-08 06:01:15 MST --- Try to get a backtrace from a crashing program then, please. Perhaps something easier than opera or moneyplex crash too? The problem is, that we can't reproduce this here. At least on one x86_64 machine here opera (the 32bit app) runs just fine. With that very glibc: % rpm -qa 'glibc*' glibc-locale-2.6.1-18.2 glibc-info-2.6.1-18.2 glibc-32bit-2.6.1-18.2 glibc-locale-32bit-2.6.1-18.2 glibc-i18ndata-2.6.1-18.2 glibc-2.6.1-18.2 glibc-devel-2.6.1-18.2 glibc-devel-32bit-2.6.1-18.2 % file /usr/lib/opera/9.23-20070809.6/opera /usr/lib/opera/9.23-20070809.6/opera: ELF 32-bit LSB executable, Intel 80386, version 1 (SYSV), for GNU/Linux 2.6.1, dynamically linked (uses shared libs), stripped % ldd /usr/lib/opera/9.23-20070809.6/opera linux-gate.so.1 => (0xffffe000) libqt-mt.so.3 => /usr/lib/libqt-mt.so.3 (0xf7872000) libX11.so.6 => /usr/lib/libX11.so.6 (0xf7757000) libXext.so.6 => /usr/lib/libXext.so.6 (0xf7748000) libSM.so.6 => /usr/lib/libSM.so.6 (0xf773f000) libICE.so.6 => /usr/lib/libICE.so.6 (0xf7726000) libpthread.so.0 => /lib/libpthread.so.0 (0xf7710000) libdl.so.2 => /lib/libdl.so.2 (0xf770b000) libm.so.6 => /lib/libm.so.6 (0xf76e6000) libz.so.1 => /lib/libz.so.1 (0xf76d3000) libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0xf75a0000) libstdc++.so.6 => /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6 (0xf74b4000) libpng12.so.0 => /usr/lib/libpng12.so.0 (0xf748f000) libXi.so.6 => /usr/lib/libXi.so.6 (0xf7485000) libXrender.so.1 => /usr/lib/libXrender.so.1 (0xf747c000) libXrandr.so.2 => /usr/lib/libXrandr.so.2 (0xf7475000) libXcursor.so.1 => /usr/lib/libXcursor.so.1 (0xf746b000) libXinerama.so.1 => /usr/lib/libXinerama.so.1 (0xf7467000) libXft.so.2 => /usr/lib/libXft.so.2 (0xf7454000) libfreetype.so.6 => /usr/lib/libfreetype.so.6 (0xf73e4000) libfontconfig.so.1 => /usr/lib/libfontconfig.so.1 (0xf73b8000) libgcc_s.so.1 => /lib/libgcc_s.so.1 (0xf73aa000) libxcb-xlib.so.0 => /usr/lib/libxcb-xlib.so.0 (0xf73a7000) libxcb.so.1 => /usr/lib/libxcb.so.1 (0xf738e000) libXau.so.6 => /usr/lib/libXau.so.6 (0xf7389000) /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0xf7f92000) libXfixes.so.3 => /usr/lib/libXfixes.so.3 (0xf7383000) libexpat.so.1 => /lib/libexpat.so.1 (0xf7362000) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=328486#c13 --- Comment #13 from Detlef Reichelt 2007-10-08 08:29:09 MST --- # rpm -Va 'glibc*' ......T /usr/lib64/gconv/gconv-modules.cache hmmm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=328486#c15 --- Comment #15 from Detlef Reichelt 2007-10-08 08:30:44 MST --- Created an attachment (id=176822) --> (https://bugzilla.novell.com/attachment.cgi?id=176822) strace of gamix -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=328486#c17 --- Comment #17 from Michael Matz 2007-10-08 09:10:51 MST --- Okay, we still can't reproduce, also not with gamix. Please try to downgrade only (!) glibc-32bit (maybe you need --force --nodeps). The backtrace is a mystery and actually just shows it breaking in the dynamic linker :-/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=328486#c19 --- Comment #19 from Detlef Reichelt 2007-10-08 16:30:47 MST --- ok, fresh install finished: - install opera -> works - add update repository - YOU - opera crash :( -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=328486#c21 Petr Baudis changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |andreas.pfaller@gmail.com --- Comment #21 from Petr Baudis 2007-10-10 04:11:51 MST --- *** Bug 332438 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=332438 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=328486#c23 --- Comment #23 from Michael Matz 2007-10-11 13:39:46 MST --- Interesting. We noticed that the 10.3 DVD contains glibc-32bit built from the i686 tree, whereas the glibc-32bit on the update comes from the i386 tree (!). That means they do contain different code, although of course all amd64 processors should work with i586 code just fine, the same like with i686 code. But never say never, so it would be very interesting to not only get the backtrace of a segfault (which wasn't that usefull after all), but also the output of the following gdb commands when the segfault occurs: (gdb) p $pc (gdb) disassemble $pc $pc+48 I've also uploaded a glibc-32bit.rpm which comes from the i686 tree, from the same sources as the update. Please try that. It's also build -18.2, so you can only detect the difference with rpm -qi (the Distribution: tag includes "i686"). So, please try the one from ftp://ftp.suse.de/pub/people/matz/bug328486/glibc-32bit.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=328486#c25 --- Comment #25 from Andreas Pfaller 2007-10-11 15:52:00 MST --- (In reply to comment #22 from Detlef Reichelt) Well, all my three 64bit systems which now have 10.3 installed show the same problem - Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU T7300 @ 2.00GHz, Laptop - AMD Athlon(tm) 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 3800+, Desktop, Socket 939 - AMD Athlon(tm) 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 4600+, Desktop, Socket AM2? so I doubt it is processor specific. The only things common are that all systems are dual cores and have 2GB of memory. (In reply to comment #23 from Michael Matz) The i686 version (from suse.com, suse.de does not have the file) works (tested on the T7300 and 4600+). I would guess it is a compiler code generation problem. Both my problematic 32bit binaries are started from extensive wrapper scripts so I am not sure how to provide the gdb output. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=328486#c27 --- Comment #27 from Detlef Reichelt 2007-10-12 05:08:51 MST --- Your glibc-32bit.rpm works for me! I find out, why the bug hits me (bwalle, thx for hint;) : If i use my local mirror of the update-repo, the rpms are installed and i get this bug. If i use an online update repo, YOU use the delta rpms, and all works fine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=328486#c29 --- Comment #29 from Michael Matz 2007-10-12 06:54:32 MST --- Re comment #26: Blaeh, right, that was already visible from the backtrace. Someone is jumping to the wildly invalid address 0x00000006, but of course we can't really determine where that came from :-( Sigh. We really need a way for reproducing this internally I fear. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=328486#c31 --- Comment #31 from Bernhard Walle 2007-10-12 08:59:52 MST --- (In reply to comment #30 from Detlef Reichelt)

Thats what i mean, if i use the patch-rpms, it works! ;)

Hm -- really? Here, it also works when I install the full RPM. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=328486#c33 --- Comment #33 from Andreas Pfaller 2007-10-12 11:59:20 MST ---

From still broken system: 75853b6c86ef1007f80e5b764b9ce50d lib/libc-2.6.1.so c539d7186f4950c5841ddf96ab2d31c5 lib/ld-2.6.1.so

-- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=328486#c35 --- Comment #35 from Detlef Reichelt 2007-10-15 01:29:27 MST --- (In reply to comment #34 from Michael Matz)

Or would it be possible to get ssh access to a machine when the broken glibc is installed (no root access required)?

wait some minutes, you will get mail... ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=328486#c37 --- Comment #37 from Andreas Pfaller 2007-10-15 02:10:14 MST --- I have just tried reverting a system to the broken state (it was broken initially, than fixed by installing the i686 glibc version from comment #23 and than tried to brake it again by installing the broken (i586) glibc with "rpm -Uv --force glibc-32bit-2.6.1-18.2.x86_64.rpm" but it still works. Further checking by comparing the md5sums of a broken system (which never had the 686 version installed) and the reverted system revealed differences in the MD5SUMs! ld-2.6.1.so: OK libBrokenLocale-2.6.1.so: OK libSegFault.so: FAILED libanl-2.6.1.so: FAILED libc-2.6.1.so: OK libcidn-2.6.1.so: FAILED libcrypt-2.6.1.so: FAILED libdl-2.6.1.so: FAILED libkeyutils-1.2.so: OK libm-2.6.1.so: OK libmemusage.so: FAILED libnsl-2.6.1.so: OK libnss_compat-2.6.1.so: FAILED libnss_dns-2.6.1.so: FAILED libnss_files-2.6.1.so: OK libnss_hesiod-2.6.1.so: FAILED libnss_nis-2.6.1.so: FAILED libnss_nisplus-2.6.1.so: FAILED libpcprofile.so: FAILED libpthread-2.6.1.so: OK libresolv-2.6.1.so: OK librt-2.6.1.so: OK libthread_db-1.0.so: FAILED libutil-2.6.1.so: FAILED md5sum: WARNING: 14 of 24 computed checksums did NOT match At the moment I think that somehow the automatic update process seems to install something different than a manual install with rpm. "rpm -qi glibc-32bit" is identical on both systems. "rpm -Vv glibc-32bit" also shows no problems on both systems, yet the MD5SUMs don't match. I will provide the output of these commands in a moment. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=328486#c39 Michael Matz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mls@novell.com --- Comment #39 from Michael Matz 2007-10-15 02:38:17 MST --- Yes, the update process is broken. With the help of the ssh account I was able to determine that on broken systems there is a mixture of the i686 glibc and the i586 glibc installed. The cause is the .patch.rpm on the update server. One after the other: 1) GA installs the i686 glibc as glibc-32bit 2) Update has the i586 glibc as glibc-32bit.rpm Both will work fine, when installed separately. But: 3) Update tree also has a .patch.rpm, which updates the changed files for the update (which are not _all_ of them), in particular it will not change libdl-2.6.1.so. Installing the patch rpm (neither the delta rpm nor the full rpm will exhibit this problem) will now replace some files on the system, e.g. ld-2.6.1.so to the update version (from the i586 tree). It will leave some files unupdated, as per the patch rpm. For instance libdl-2.6.1.so. So, now there's a mixture of an i686 libdl-2.6.1.so and a i586 ld-2.6.1.so installed. This is indeed not supported by glibc. All these files dealing with the runtime linker have to come out of the same build (they use internal interfaces which change over build configurations). Therefore this segfault. There are two bugs in here: 1) actually generating the patch.rpm went somehow wrong. A correct patch.rpm (from i686-GA glibc-32bit to i586-Update glibc-32bit _should_ have contained all files). 2) That applying the patch.rpm didn't result in exactly the same files as installing the full rpm obviously isn't checked. Hence some integrity checking is missing in actually applying patch rpms. Not again, that this wouldn't have happened if the update process would have either used the delta rpm, or the full rpm. yast2 should have chosen the delta rpm actually. Have you used a different installer? CCing also mls as the patch rpm definitely is completely wrong. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=328486#c41 --- Comment #41 from Andreas Pfaller 2007-10-15 03:19:46 MST --- (In reply to comment #39 from Michael Matz)

Not again, that this wouldn't have happened if the update process would have either used the delta rpm, or the full rpm. yast2 should have chosen the delta rpm actually. Have you used a different installer?

I used either "you" or "opensuseupdater-kde" on all systems. I did some experiments with "--exclude"-ing patch and delta rpms from my rsync update of my local repository since they are redundant but I am quite sure that I had a complete rsync when the problem happened. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=328486#c43 Ruediger Oertel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO Info Provider| |ast@novell.com --- Comment #43 from Ruediger Oertel 2007-10-18 03:59:52 MST --- as a quick start I'm rerunning that patch with a fixed glibc-32bit (now the i686 one again) thus removing the broken rpm/delta/patch, which will fix things for people updating now. However, we will need another update to fix the systems that are affected already. Anja: please can I get a new SWAMPID so we can really fix this ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=328486#c45 --- Comment #45 from Michael Matz 2007-10-23 05:17:03 MST --- /mounts/mirror/SuSE/ftp.opensuse.org/srv/ftp/pub/opensuse/update/10.3/rpm/x86_64/glibc-32bit-2.6.1-18.2.x86_64.patch.rpm still is the old one. Someone should please remove it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=328486#c47 Ruediger Oertel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED --- Comment #47 from Ruediger Oertel 2007-10-23 16:34:54 MST --- old patch (with rpms release-number 18.2) has been removed completely new patch with rebuilt glibc rpms (release-number 18.3) has been checked in and is in the queue for approval (id 528d3b710b55f4880b33cb600342e274) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.