[Bug 305571] New: Slower speed of "software management"
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305571 Summary: Slower speed of "software management" Product: openSUSE 10.3 Version: Beta 2 Platform: x86 OS/Version: openSUSE 10.3 Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: libzypp AssignedTo: kkaempf@novell.com ReportedBy: ra100@atlas.sk QAContact: kkaempf@novell.com Found By: --- Hello. I have experience that speed of "software management" of YaST isn't faster than openSUSE10.2. It is slower even. I have added 3 repos. Inst-source, inst-source-debug and inst-source-extra. So i compared time 10.2 and 10.3. For example. When i start it, a window "checking dependency" is shown longer, in my case around 2 seconds. A window isn´t shown at all in opensuse 10.2. When i search for any package, searching takes much more time than in openSUSE 10.2. Beta2 about 2 seconds and more. It depends on package. Result is shown almost immediately in openSUSE 10.2. When i switch among repositories, it also takes a longer time. Beta2 takes about 1 s. and depends which one repo is selected. The biggest repo inst-source takes approximately 3 seconds. Repos are changed immediately in openSUSE 102 and the bigest repo inst-source takes only approx. 0,5 s. When any package is installed successfully, switching back to main window takes a long time also, about 2s in Beta2 and it seems like frozen. openSUSE 10.2 is smoothly. Starting of "software management" of 10.3 takes approx. 30 s. and openSUSE 10.2 also. Speed of zypper in command line is really fast. openSUSE 10.3 time zypper se kde real 0m2.968s user 0m2.460s sys 0m0.156s openSUSE 10.2 time zypper se kde real 0m32.818s user 0m24.762s sys 0m1.352s My CPU is Athlon XP 2500+ (it´s about 1.8GHz) and i had even increased RAM from 768MB to 1.2GB before i installed Beta2. By the way, similar experience from another user in discussion under article on http://news.opensuse.org/?p=153 quote "About speed: my experience is, that it got faster of fast machine (2Ghz+dualcore), about the same on a single core 2.4Ghz P4, and a lot slower on anything below." Regards -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305571#c1
Benjamin Weber
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305571#c2
--- Comment #2 from Rastislav Krupanský
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305571#c3
--- Comment #3 from Rastislav Krupanský
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305571#c4
Klaus Kämpf
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305571#c5
--- Comment #5 from Rastislav Krupanský
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305571#c6
Stefan Hundhammer
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305571#c7
--- Comment #7 from Rastislav Krupanský
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305571#c8
Stefan Hundhammer
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305571#c9
--- Comment #9 from Stefan Hundhammer
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305571#c10
--- Comment #10 from Rastislav Krupanský
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305571
Klaus Kämpf
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305571#c11
Stefan Hundhammer
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305571#c16
--- Comment #16 from Stefan Hundhammer
I disabled autocheck and searching is faster, that's true. But that's all:-(
Come to think of it, I can understand how you came to this impression: The first search was slow (because the data weren't loaded completely yet). Then you tried what to do to make it faster. You tried to change "auto check". And the next search was indeed quicker than the first -- which OTOH it always is, regardless of "auto check". It's really not your fault that you came to this conclusion. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305571#c17
Klaus Kämpf
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305571#c18
Michael Andres
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305571#c19
--- Comment #19 from Klaus Kämpf
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305571#c20
--- Comment #20 from Rastislav Krupanský
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305571
Stefan Hundhammer
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305571#c21
--- Comment #21 from Duncan Mac-Vicar
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305571#c22
--- Comment #22 from Stanislav Visnovsky
If i can suggest something, if you think time saved durnig launch of a "software management"(in comment #15), i've compared time of launch in Beta2 and in 10.2 with three identical repositaires turned on. It takes about 30 seconds in both versions (as i wrote in "Description"), so i can't see any saved time there.
Were the repos refreshed already? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305571#c23
--- Comment #23 from Stefan Hundhammer
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305571#c24
Klaus Kämpf
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305571#c25
Stefan Hundhammer
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305571#c27
--- Comment #27 from Rastislav Krupanský
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305571#c28
--- Comment #28 from Stefan Hundhammer
But searching, switching among repositories, switching back to main window after installation ... is still the same.
That is to be expected: Changing repositories invalidates the cache (at least, part of the cache). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305571#c29
--- Comment #29 from Rastislav Krupanský
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305571#c30
Stefan Hundhammer
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305571
User ra100@atlas.sk added comment
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305571#c31
--- Comment #31 from Rastislav Krupansky
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305571
User dmacvicar@novell.com added comment
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305571#c32
Duncan Mac-Vicar
participants (1)
-
bugzilla_noreply@novell.com