https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=296952#c1 Stanislav Brabec changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED --- Comment #1 from Stanislav Brabec 2007-09-06 11:15:49 MST --- Thu Sep 6 18:56:24 CEST 2007 - sbrabec@suse.cz - Removed bogus provides (#296952). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=296952#c3 Ruediger Oertel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cthiel@novell.com, coolo@novell.com --- Comment #3 from Ruediger Oertel 2007-09-11 03:49:59 MST --- just to state it again: - the goal for an update 10.2->10.3 is: yast does not need to ask any questions and all packages are being replaced by their successors - either "pidgin" or "pidgin-gaim-compat" should be the successor for gaim - the successor works exactly like a package rename, which is explained in http://en.opensuse.org/Upgrade_Dependencies: Renaming a package (pac -> package) package.spec: Name: package Version: 1.1 Provides: pac = 1.0 Obsoletes: pac <= 1.0 if the old package is gone (and gaim is gone), there should be no conflicts (which make yast just ask questions) but proper obsoletes and provides. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=296952#c5 Stanislav Brabec changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ke@novell.com Status|REOPENED |NEEDINFO Info Provider| |ro@novell.com --- Comment #5 from Stanislav Brabec 2007-09-11 10:21:12 MST --- pidgin-gaim-compat or pidging are only functional replacement. Nor libpurple nor pidgin provide any gaim compatibility. It has an incompatible API names, library names and install directories. The whole purpose of pidgin-gaim-compat hac is providing a small script, which warns users, that they call pidgin using bad names. Should I use Provides even in such case in addition to Obsoletes? Apropos, Karl, is it documented, that gaim was renamed to pidgin? ----- GAIM instant messenger was renamed to Pidgin. ----- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=296952#c7 --- Comment #7 from Karl Eichwalder 2007-09-11 23:16:23 MST --- Nevertheless publishing such a renaming list would be a nice thing, but, admittedly, much work (probably too much). Because GAIM/pidgin is a GNOME key application, I'd like to mention it in the release notes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=296952#c9 Stanislav Brabec changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|REOPENED |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED --- Comment #9 from Stanislav Brabec 2007-09-12 05:40:10 MST --- Adding provides/obsoletes to binary packages, obsoletes only to devel packages, removed all conflicts. Dropped gaim-compat-devel hacks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.