[Bug 543484] New: Scheduler ignores Obsoletes tag
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543484 Summary: Scheduler ignores Obsoletes tag Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE.org Version: unspecified Platform: Other OS/Version: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: BuildService AssignedTo: bnc-team-screening@forge.provo.novell.com ReportedBy: vuntz@novell.com QAContact: adrian@novell.com Found By: --- To fix a build failure, we renamed the libseed-0 package to libseed0 and the latter now provides/obsoletes the former. So for zypper, libseed0 will replace libseed-0. However, in the build service, we have some expansion errors: have choice for libseed.so.0 needed by seed: libseed-0 libseed0 (this is because libseed0 is in G:F and libseed-0 is in oS:F, I guess) The scheduler should probably consider the Obsoletes/Provides tag to make a choice there. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543484
Marcus Meissner
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543484
User mls@novell.com added comment
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543484#c1
Michael Schröder
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543484
User vuntz@novell.com added comment
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543484#c2
--- Comment #2 from Vincent Untz
I not sure about this. We want consistent builds, so we treat every choice as error.
If you always handle Obsoletes, then the builds will be consistent :-)
(Btw, a simple workaround is to add a "Prefer: libseed0" to your project configuration.)
Yeah, I know the workaround, but I think it shouldn't be needed in this case. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543484
User mls@novell.com added comment
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543484#c3
--- Comment #3 from Michael Schröder
participants (1)
-
bugzilla_noreply@novell.com