https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=379477 User vuntz@novell.com added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=379477#c1 Vincent Untz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fejj@novell.com --- Comment #1 from Vincent Untz 2008-04-15 13:13:43 MST --- Jeff: we *really* need to get the patch that removes the media handling from gvm in a tarball upstream. We're ending up with bugs like this now because we're using a patch that is not complete... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=379477 User abockover@novell.com added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=379477#c2 Aaron Bockover changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |abockover@novell.com --- Comment #2 from Aaron Bockover 2008-04-23 22:56:16 MST --- Ok, the state of gnome-volume-manager is insane. It doesn't actually handle /volumes/ at this point. Is this an upstream issue? Does g-v-m effectively do anything at this point? Where has the functionality been moved? Where is the UI for turning on/off the auto-mounting of volumes? Do the old GConf keys mean anything? None of my volumes get mounted in 11b1, and I am suspecting g-v-m. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=379477 User abockover@novell.com added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=379477#c4 --- Comment #4 from Aaron Bockover 2008-04-24 11:51:37 MST --- I don't see any option for choosing whether volumes should be mounted at all. All I see here is a list of programs for handling various media. So I'm a bit confused by this all. In the past we had g-v-m listen to hardware events from HAL, it would mount any volumes based on some policy, and HAL would then reflect this. So what does mounting now? Does gvfs do it? Does Nautilus do it? Maybe this is not the appropriate bug, but since this is all a bit confusing... I have a few keys in GConf set, possibly left over from my 10.3 install: /desktop/gnome/volume_manager/automount_drives = true /desktop/gnome/volume_manager/automount_media = true Are these keys obsolete? I'm guessing so since I also have: /apps/nautilus/preferences/media_automount = true I don't see any UI in the Media tab in Nautilus' File Management properties that is mapped to this key though. Furthermore, all of these are set to true, but no volumes actually get mounted. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=379477 User vuntz@novell.com added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=379477#c6 Vincent Untz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|Normal |Minor Priority|P5 - None |P2 - High --- Comment #6 from Vincent Untz 2008-07-25 07:40:39 MDT --- Okay, let's set this to High -- not only because of the name issue, but also to figure out if we still need gvm. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.