https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=342704#c1 --- Comment #1 from Markus Kuhn 2007-11-19 09:40:01 MST --- There are two entirely separate license questions here: copyright and patents. Copyright: I hold the sole copyright in the JBIG-KIT (http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~mgk25/jbigkit/) library. I make it available either freely under the GPL (note: *not* the LGPL!) or, for a one-off payment to the University of Cambridge technology-transfer office, under a commercial license that permits proprietary modifications and linking with proprietary (non-GPL) code. Summery: if you want to link your code with JBIG-KIT, either make sure all your linked remaining code complies with the license conditions of the GPL, or buy a commercial license (which is much cheaper than what Lucent will charge you for their patent licenses). Several large printer manufacturers have done the latter. Patents: IBM, Lucent and a few other companies might hold or enforce patents that cover aspects of the JBIG algorithm. My understanding of this subject is summarized at http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~mgk25/jbigkit/patents.html Neither my GPL license nor our commercial license for JBIG-KIT includes licenses for any patents that may be applicable to the JBIG standard. So users of JBIG-KIT are still themselves responsible to get the relevant patent licenses from the relevant patent holders. Which licenses you need might depends on your country and use (e.g., my non-expert understanding is that non-commercial use does not require any patent licenses in Germany, but that may not be the case in , for instance, the U.S.). I understand that IBM may have granted a free general license of their relevant patents to anyone who wants to use JBIG in some letter deposited with ISO or ITU-T, but I do not know whether the same is the case for other holders of potentially relevant patents. I have yet to look at hplip before I can comment on what happened there. Is a HP product? In which case, they most likely would have all the necessary licenses. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=342704#c3 Johannes Meixner changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|jsmeix@novell.com |cfarrell@novell.com --- Comment #3 from Johannes Meixner 2007-11-20 02:12:47 MST --- HP is fully aware of the JBIG issue. HP was in contact with me regarding how to provide support for ZJStream printers in compliance to the free licenses. In the end they do it the same way as IScan: Via an optional external library (via dlopen). The crucial point is that the HPLIP software works well in general even without such a library. Only the ZJStream printers need it. HP checked the third-party license stuff and all what is requird is a EULA which must be accepted by the user. The download functionality of hp-setup does "the right thing" which is needed to support ZJStream printers. Currently HP provides the binary-only libraries for i386, x86_64, and ppc. It was discussed and accepted at the OpenPrinting Summit in Montreal, see http://www.linux-foundation.org/en/SummitMontrealSummary There is no JBIG in the HPLIP sources. See the RPM changelog in the HPLIP 2.7.10 packages at http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/home:/jsmeix/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- New LJZjsMono printer device class for ZJStream printers. ZJStream printers require JBIG which has patent issues (see Novell/Suse Bugzilla bug #263181). Therefore the support for ZJStream printers is provided only via a binary-only plugin which is downloaded by "hp-setup" from the HP web-site only after the user has accepted the license terms. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- There are even no PPDs for their ZJStream printers included in the HPLIP sources so that generic setup tools would not set up queues which cannot work for those printers.

From my point of view the issue is correctly handled.

To be 100% safe, I reassign it to our license ecperts. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=342704#c6 --- Comment #6 from Johannes Meixner 2007-11-20 03:57:14 MST --- Markus, very many thanks for the above details! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.