http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519192 Marcus Meissner changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|bnc-team-screening@forge.pr |meissner@novell.com |ovo.novell.com | -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519192 User dieter.jurzitza@t-online.de added comment http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519192#c3 --- Comment #3 from Dieter Jurzitza 2009-07-03 14:55:05 MDT --- Hi Marcus, my two cents here: - all you developers love chroot environments. I don't because it is additional effort for me being an "in the evening after work linuxian". - I want my system to be "rpmified" and not "make installified" because the latter is hard to maintain as there is no package management to check for collisions and whatsoever. This is the reason why I only build rpm's and tried to get this going on AMD64, too. Moreover I'd suggest to add a rpmbuild32 on top of rpmbuild on AMD64 systems, containing rpmbuild32 -> ../lib/rpm/rpmb32 and /usr/lib/rpm/rpmb32 #!/bin/sh /usr/bin/linux32 /usr/lib/rpmb $* in a script. This seems to be more self explanatory when it comes to try to generate 32bit apps on a 64bit architecture. What regards my patches: As a matter of fact something is going wrong with the linker flags (and only with those) from within rpm when doing a "linux32 rpmbuild -ba wine.spec" as it is now, because all calls to the linker fail when trying to build the plain spec file. The linker always breaks (at several locations) saying that he is told to generate a 64bit app but the object files he gets all are 32bit (what is the good side of the story). As I did a lot of guessing to make things work a part of the modifications may be or may not be neccessary, someone with a better understanding of what configure does (hopefully you) should be able to fix it. As long as wine keeps being a i586 app the question arises (to me) whether that linker flag I added to the configure line in the spec file should not be there in general as it would not harm on i586 but is definitively a must on AMD64. Anyway, thank you for your time and for looking into this! Take care Dieter -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519192 User meissner@novell.com added comment http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519192#c5 --- Comment #5 from Marcus Meissner 2009-07-04 05:04:20 MDT --- Created an attachment (id=302954) --> (http://bugzilla.novell.com/attachment.cgi?id=302954) specpatch -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519192 User dieter.jurzitza@t-online.de added comment http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519192#c7 --- Comment #7 from Dieter Jurzitza 2009-07-05 10:41:11 MDT --- Hi Marcus, first of all, thanks again. One thing I'd like to add because it was quite misleading: when building on AMD64 you can easily get messages about freetype not available though all available freetype packages are there, including the 32 Bit versions. It comes out when looking into config log that libz is actually missing in the 32bit version, not freetype. Would be nice if one gets the right pointer, because this is very misleading! I guess you have an bugzilla account for wine and you know the developers, it would be very kind if you could place a hint at the right position. Thank you for looking into this: The message: SCHNIPP: checking for freetype-config... freetype-config checking for -lfreetype... not found configure: error: FreeType 32-bit development files not found. Fonts will not b Use the --without-freetype option if you really want this. error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.90101 (%build) RPM build errors: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.90101 (%build) The root cause: SCHNAPP: configure:14508: checking for -lfreetype configure:14543: gcc -m32 -o conftest -O2 -g -fmessage-length=0 -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fstack-protector -funwind-tables -fasynchronous-unwind-tables conftest.c -lfreetype -lfreetype -lz >&5 /usr/lib64/gcc/x86_64-suse-linux/4.3/../../../../x86_64-suse-linux/bin/ld: skipping incompatible /usr/lib64/gcc/x86_64-suse-linux/4.3/../../../libz.so when searching for -lz /usr/lib64/gcc/x86_64-suse-linux/4.3/../../../../x86_64-suse-linux/bin/ld: skipping incompatible /usr/lib64/gcc/x86_64-suse-linux/4.3/../../../libz.a when searching for -lz /usr/lib64/gcc/x86_64-suse-linux/4.3/../../../../x86_64-suse-linux/bin/ld: skipping incompatible /usr/lib64/libz.so when searching for -lz /usr/lib64/gcc/x86_64-suse-linux/4.3/../../../../x86_64-suse-linux/bin/ld: skipping incompatible /usr/lib64/libz.a when searching for -lz /usr/lib64/gcc/x86_64-suse-linux/4.3/../../../../x86_64-suse-linux/bin/ld: cannot find -lz collect2: ld returned 1 exit status configure:14550: $? = 1 configure: failed program was: libz is missing! -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519192 User dieter.jurzitza@t-online.de added comment http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519192#c9 --- Comment #9 from Dieter Jurzitza 2009-07-05 12:21:18 MDT --- Created an attachment (id=303010) --> (http://bugzilla.novell.com/attachment.cgi?id=303010) patch against wine.spec to make linux32 rpmbuild -ba wine.spec work on AMD64 See description - nothing more to add. This is a means to reproduce the very same rpms on an AMD64 platform as you get in a regular environment on a i586 platform. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519192 User dieter.jurzitza@t-online.de added comment http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519192#c11 --- Comment #11 from Dieter Jurzitza 2009-07-06 23:29:49 MDT --- Created an attachment (id=303341) --> (http://bugzilla.novell.com/attachment.cgi?id=303341) Last patch - breaks intentionally on AMD64 telling you what is required .... -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519192 User meissner@novell.com added comment http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519192#c13 --- Comment #13 from Marcus Meissner 2009-07-08 03:00:59 MDT --- iii have added ttthe LDFLAGS and TARGETFLAGS part, but for the rest i have noew just set ExclusiveArch: %ix86 recompilers should know what to do. ;) -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.