[Bug 1002492] New: checkproc: can not get session id for process 5378!
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1002492 Bug ID: 1002492 Summary: checkproc: can not get session id for process 5378! Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Distribution Version: Leap 42.1 Hardware: x86-64 OS: openSUSE 42.1 Status: NEW Severity: Minor Priority: P5 - None Component: Basesystem Assignee: bnc-team-screening@forge.provo.novell.com Reporter: jdelvare@suse.com QA Contact: qa-bugs@suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- Every time I log into gnome, the following error message is logged in the journal: checkproc[1942]: checkproc: can not get session id for process 5378! Note that the process number of checkproc changes every time, however the problematic process number is always 5378, which I find rather suspicious. By the time I start a shell, there is no process 5378... if there ever was. The message immediately following this one in the journal is always: org.a11y.Bus[1952]: Activating service name='org.a11y.atspi.Registry' but there is no proof these are related. So I have no idea who is producing the error message. I believe such error message need to be improved to mention the name of both the calling service/process and some information about the process it looks for. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1002492
Jean Delvare
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1002492
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1002492#c1
--- Comment #1 from Franck Bui
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1002492
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1002492#c2
--- Comment #2 from Jean Delvare
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1002492
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1002492#c3
--- Comment #3 from Jean Delvare
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1002492
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1002492#c4
--- Comment #4 from Jean Delvare
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1002492
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1002492#c5
Jean Delvare
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1002492
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1002492#c6
--- Comment #6 from Jean Delvare
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1002492
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1002492#c7
--- Comment #7 from Jean Delvare
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1002492
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1002492#c8
--- Comment #8 from Jean Delvare
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1002492
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1002492#c9
Stefan Dirsch
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1002492
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1002492#c13
--- Comment #13 from Jean Delvare
The only idea I have is to check if the process its self exists and if not to skip the session test.
I was thinking along the same lines. It is a perfectly valid use case that the process doesn't exist, actually the whole point of calling checkproc is that the process may or may not exist. So no error nor warning should be logged in this case. I agree that we should not look for a session id for a process that doesn't exist, it doesn't make sense. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1002492
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1002492#c14
--- Comment #14 from Jean Delvare
participants (1)
-
bugzilla_noreply@novell.com