What | Removed | Added |
---|---|---|
Flags | needinfo?(william.brown@suse.com) |
Yes, that seems like the error message that I saw - though I don't remember it being so harsh in wording. Maybe from a UX perspective because of the green (good) + small text it was easy to just overlook this as a "gentle warning" rather than a strong warning like it's intended. Perhaps the "accept" could be coloured red, and the text changed to "Volume group operations may FAIL: <reason>" to help move the impact to the first part of the sentence so that it's harder to overlook. It could also be good to have a remediation step so the text reads like: Volume Group operations may FAIL. Some Logical Volumes may be IGNORED. Detected LVM logical volumes of unsupported types: <WHATEVER> To resolve this you should inspect Volume Group <VG> and restart the installation. [ <GREEN>: Go To SHELL to fix ] [ <RED>: Accept the consequences ] Is that a reasonable suggestion? Saying this, it would be pretty good if yast did know what an lvmcache pool device was too :)