Comment # 5 on bug 1146933 from David Diaz

(In reply to William Brown from comment #4)
> Yes, that seems like the error message that I saw - though I don't remember
> it being so harsh in wording. Maybe from a UX perspective because of the
> green (good) + small text it was easy to just overlook this as a "gentle
> warning" rather than a strong warning like it's intended.
> 
> Perhaps the "accept" could be coloured red, and the text changed to "Volume
> group operations may FAIL: <reason>" to help move the impact to the first
> part of the sentence so that it's harder to overlook.
> 
> It could also be good to have a remediation step so the text reads like:
> 
> Volume Group operations may FAIL. Some Logical Volumes may be IGNORED.
> 
> Detected LVM logical volumes of unsupported types: <WHATEVER>
> 
> To resolve this you should inspect Volume Group <VG> and restart the
> installation. 
> 
> [ <GREEN>: Go To SHELL to fix ] [ <RED>: Accept the consequences ]
> 
> 
> Is that a reasonable suggestion?
> 
> Saying this, it would be pretty good if yast did know what an lvmcache pool
> device was too :)

Thank you for the feedback. 

I cannot promise anything regarding to the final decision, but I am going to
put this report under the PO radar.