Comment # 103 on bug 1017461 from Oliver Kurz

(In reply to Edmund Nadolski from comment #101)
> [���]
> I am restoring the previous status as I am not clear of the justification to
> re-open -- considering that the indicated patches evidently were not even
> run, it is not shown that a problem still exists.
> 
> These patches have demonstrated a 50% improvement in btrfs backref
> performance, so if further symptoms are observed there may well be other
> causes (not necessarily even in the fs - as you mention the whole system
> would need to be looked at).  In that case the best way forward is to please
> open a new BZ including all relevant info so that it can be properly
> investigated (and without potential obfuscation from the previous issue).

Errr, I am not sure what your intention is. I am pretty sure that I run a
kernel with the patches you mentioned checking with `rpm -q --changelog
kernel-default`. As I stated I think your contributions improved the situation.
Ok, I don't want to annoy you so I created another bug for the "btrfs
maintenance scripts review":
https://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1063638