(In reply to Olaf Hering from comment #24) > (In reply to Thomas Blume from comment #23) > > Maybe it's worth a feature request? > > Why is this a feature? Its a clear regression! > > In 11.4 the crypt branch just waited for the specified timeout (In fact it > was not a branch, but a step). Once it returned with failure or success the > following steps just used what was available. > > To get that back the fstab thing has to depend on crypt. There is no need > for timeout or anything in fstab. The fstab step just has to reuse what > earlier steps provide. > > I will double check if your suggested timeout values actually work. In my > testing they dont, and a value of zero does actually nothing. It should work, see: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=861123