February 2011 - openSUSE Bugs - openSUSE Mailing Lists

[Bug 564304] New: growisofs can not burn sata dvd
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 17 Aug '16

17 Aug '16

http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=564304 http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=564304#c0 Summary: growisofs can not burn sata dvd Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE 11.2 Version: Final Platform: i686 OS/Version: openSUSE 11.2 Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Basesystem AssignedTo: bnc-team-screening(a)forge.provo.novell.com ReportedBy: carlos.e.r(a)opensuse.org QAContact: qa(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- The machine is described in http://www.smolts.org/client/show/pub_48ea7e31-b8d3-4dc0-b3bf-49401155e07f growisofs fails to burn: bombadillo:/mnt/usb/Test/para_quemar # time growisofs -Z /dev/sr0=Copia.iso Executing 'builtin_dd if=Copia.iso of=/dev/sr0 obs=32k seek=0' /dev/sr0: "Current Write Speed" is 22.7x1352KBps. 0/4371568640 ( 0.0%) @0x, remaining ??:?? RBU 100.0% UBU 0.0% :-? the LUN appears to be stuck writing LBA=f0h, keep retrying in 4ms 491520/4371568640 ( 0.0%) @0.1x, remaining 1037:30 RBU 100.0% UBU 3.1% :-[ WRITE@LBA=f0h failed with SK=5h/INVALID ADDRESS FOR WRITE]: Invalid argument :-( write failed: Invalid argument /dev/sr0: flushing cache /dev/sr0: updating RMA /dev/sr0: closing session real 1m19.677s user 0m0.002s sys 0m0.157s message log: Dec 13 01:06:35 bombadillo kernel: [60962.703499] cdrom: This disc doesn't have any tracks I recognize! Dec 13 01:06:35 bombadillo kernel: [60962.728450] sr 5:0:0:0: [sr0] Result: hostbyte=DID_OK driverbyte=DRIVER_SENSE Dec 13 01:06:35 bombadillo kernel: [60962.728462] sr 5:0:0:0: [sr0] Sense Key : Illegal Request [current] Dec 13 01:06:35 bombadillo kernel: [60962.728472] Info fld=0x0 Dec 13 01:06:35 bombadillo kernel: [60962.728477] sr 5:0:0:0: [sr0] Add. Sense: Logical block address out of range Dec 13 01:06:35 bombadillo kernel: [60962.728488] end_request: I/O error, dev sr0, sector 0 Dec 13 01:06:35 bombadillo kernel: [60962.728495] Buffer I/O error on device sr0, logical block 0 Dec 13 01:06:35 bombadillo kernel: [60962.731161] sr 5:0:0:0: [sr0] Result: hostbyte=DID_OK driverbyte=DRIVER_SENSE Dec 13 01:06:35 bombadillo kernel: [60962.731176] sr 5:0:0:0: [sr0] Sense Key : Illegal Request [current] Dec 13 01:06:35 bombadillo kernel: [60962.731185] Info fld=0x0 Dec 13 01:06:35 bombadillo kernel: [60962.731190] sr 5:0:0:0: [sr0] Add. Sense: Logical block address out of range Dec 13 01:06:35 bombadillo kernel: [60962.731200] end_request: I/O error, dev sr0, sector 0 Dec 13 01:06:35 bombadillo kernel: [60962.731207] Buffer I/O error on device sr0, logical block 0 Brasero also fails: Checking session consistency (brasero_burn_check_session_consistency brasero-burn.c:1799) BraseroBurnURI called brasero_job_get_action BraseroBurnURI called brasero_job_get_action BraseroBurnURI called brasero_job_set_output_size_for_current_track BraseroBurnURI stopping BraseroBurnURI called brasero_job_get_action BraseroBurnURI called brasero_job_get_session_output_size BraseroBurnURI output set (IMAGE) image = /tmp/brasero_tmp_LE1U4U.bin toc = none BraseroBurnURI called brasero_job_get_action BraseroBurnURI called brasero_job_get_current_track BraseroBurnURI no burn:// URI found BraseroBurnURI stopping BraseroGrowisofs called brasero_job_get_action BraseroGrowisofs getting varg BraseroGrowisofs called brasero_job_get_action BraseroGrowisofs called brasero_job_get_current_track BraseroGrowisofs got varg: BraseroGrowisofs deactivating BraseroGrowisofs called brasero_job_get_action BraseroGrowisofs getting varg BraseroGrowisofs called brasero_job_get_action BraseroGrowisofs called brasero_job_get_flags BraseroGrowisofs called brasero_job_get_speed BraseroGrowisofs called brasero_job_get_device BraseroGrowisofs called brasero_job_get_action BraseroGrowisofs called brasero_job_get_session_output_size BraseroGrowisofs called brasero_job_get_current_track BraseroGrowisofs called brasero_job_get_fd_in BraseroGrowisofs called brasero_job_set_current_action BraseroGrowisofs got varg: growisofs -use-the-force-luke=notray -use-the-force-luke=4gms -dvd-compat -speed=22 -use-the-force-luke=tracksize:2134555 -use-the-force-luke=tty -Z /dev/sr0=/mnt/usb/Test/para_quemar/Copia.iso BraseroGrowisofs Launching command BraseroGrowisofs called brasero_job_get_fd_out BraseroGrowisofs stdout: Executing 'builtin_dd if=/mnt/usb/Test/para_quemar/Copia.iso of=/dev/sr0 obs=32k seek=0' BraseroGrowisofs called brasero_job_set_dangerous BraseroGrowisofs stderr: /dev/sr0: "Current Write Speed" is 22.5x1352KBps. BraseroGrowisofs stdout: 0/4371568640 ( 0.0%) @0x, remaining ??:?? RBU 100.0% UBU 0.0% BraseroGrowisofs stderr: :-? the LUN appears to be stuck writing LBA=f0h, keep retrying in 4ms BraseroGrowisofs stdout: 491520/4371568640 ( 0.0%) @0.1x, remaining 1185:43 RBU 100.0% UBU 3.1% BraseroGrowisofs called brasero_job_get_action BraseroGrowisofs called brasero_job_set_current_action BraseroGrowisofs stderr: :-[ WRITE@LBA=f0h failed with SK=5h/INVALID ADDRESS FOR WRITE]: Invalid argument BraseroGrowisofs stderr: :-( write failed: Invalid argument BraseroGrowisofs stderr: /dev/sr0: flushing cache BraseroGrowisofs called brasero_job_set_current_action BraseroGrowisofs stderr: /dev/sr0: updating RMA BraseroGrowisofs stderr: /dev/sr0: closing disc BraseroGrowisofs stderr: HUP BraseroGrowisofs stdout: HUP BraseroGrowisofs process finished with status 22 BraseroGrowisofs called brasero_job_error BraseroGrowisofs finished with an error BraseroGrowisofs asked to stop because of an error error = 0 message = "no message" BraseroGrowisofs stopping BraseroGrowisofs got killed Session error : unknown (brasero_burn_record brasero-burn.c:2769) Hwinfo: 48: udi = '/org/freedesktop/Hal/devices/storage_model_DVDRAM_GH22LS50' storage.removable.media_available = true storage.removable.media_size = 491520ull (0x78000ull) storage.partitioning_scheme = '' storage.cdrom.cdr = true storage.cdrom.cdrw = true storage.cdrom.dvd = true storage.cdrom.dvdr = true storage.cdrom.dvdrw = true storage.cdrom.dvdrdl = true storage.cdrom.dvdram = true storage.cdrom.dvdplusr = true storage.cdrom.dvdplusrw = true storage.cdrom.dvdplusrwdl = false storage.cdrom.dvdplusrdl = true storage.cdrom.bd = false storage.cdrom.bdr = false storage.cdrom.bdre = false storage.cdrom.hddvd = false storage.cdrom.hddvdr = false storage.cdrom.hddvdrw = false storage.cdrom.mo = false storage.cdrom.mrw = true storage.cdrom.mrw_w = true storage.cdrom.support_media_changed = true storage.cdrom.support_multisession = true storage.cdrom.read_speed = 22160 (0x5690) storage.cdrom.write_speed = 30470 (0x7706) storage.cdrom.write_speeds = { '30470', '27700', '24930', '22160', '11080', '5540' } block.storage_device = '/org/freedesktop/Hal/devices/storage_model_DVDRAM_GH22LS50' info.category = 'storage' info.capabilities = { 'storage', 'block', 'storage.cdrom' } org.freedesktop.Hal.Device.Storage.method_names = { 'Eject', 'CloseTray' } org.freedesktop.Hal.Device.Storage.method_signatures = { 'as', 'as' } org.freedesktop.Hal.Device.Storage.method_argnames = { 'extra_options', 'extra_options' } org.freedesktop.Hal.Device.Storage.method_execpaths = { 'hal-storage-eject', 'hal-storage-closetray' } info.product = 'DVDRAM GH22LS50' info.udi = '/org/freedesktop/Hal/devices/storage_model_DVDRAM_GH22LS50' info.interfaces = { 'org.freedesktop.Hal.Device.Storage', 'org.freedesktop.Hal.Device.Storage', 'org.freedesktop.Hal.Device.Storage.Removable' } block.device = '/dev/sr0' block.major = 11 (0xb) block.minor = 0 (0x0) block.is_volume = false storage.bus = 'pci' storage.no_partitions_hint = true storage.media_check_enabled = true storage.automount_enabled_hint = true storage.drive_type = 'cdrom' storage.model = 'DVDRAM GH22LS50' storage.vendor = 'HL-DT-ST' storage.firmware_version = 'TL01' storage.lun = 0 (0x0) linux.sysfs_path = '/sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1f.5/host5/target5:0:0/5:0:0:0/block/sr0' info.parent = '/org/freedesktop/Hal/devices/pci_8086_3a26_scsi_host_scsi_device_lun0' storage.removable = true storage.originating_device = '/org/freedesktop/Hal/devices/computer' storage.hotpluggable = false storage.requires_eject = true storage.size = 0ull (0x0ull) storage.removable.support_async_notification = false info.vendor = 'HL-DT-ST' linux.hotplug_type = 3 (0x3) info.addons = { 'hald-addon-storage' } -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 15

[Bug 505546] New: Grub fails to write bootrecord on dmraid disk (GPT labeled)
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 16 Aug '16

16 Aug '16

http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505546 User Winfrid.Tschiedel(a)ts.fujitsu.com added comment http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505546#c500322 Summary: Grub fails to write bootrecord on dmraid disk (GPT labeled) Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE 11.2 Version: Milestone 1 Platform: x86-64 OS/Version: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Installation AssignedTo: bnc-team-screening(a)forge.provo.novell.com ReportedBy: Winfrid.Tschiedel(a)ts.fujitsu.com QAContact: jsrain(a)novell.com Found By: --- Created an attachment (id=293215) --> (http://bugzilla.novell.com/attachment.cgi?id=293215) saved installation logs User-Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; Tablet PC 1.7; .NET CLR 1.0.3705; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.04506.648; .NET CLR 3.5.21022; MS-RTC LM 8; InfoPath.2) I tried to install openSUSE 11.2 Milestone 1 on Fujitsu Primergy RX220 ( Promise FastTrak TX 150 S4 ), one disk with RAID0, GPT labeled ( Same problem exists also on Fujitsu Primergy rx200s4 with ESB2 (LSI Firmware) and one disk RAID0. Installation works until the boot record should be written. In case of rx220 the boot record should be written to the root partition. Beside the error 22: No such partition also the MBR was destroyed. Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Installed openSUSE 11.2 on fake raid with GPT Actual Results: No boot redord was written Expected Results: Correct operation, install a system which can be booted afterwards In the latest release of fedora 11 (Preview) almost everything works out of the box, which means only manual interaction for the following items is needed : mklabel gpt (no botton for writing new partition table!) mkinitrd on distribution is in error for details please read #500322 (bugzilla.redhat.com) I tried to write a new bootrecord with fedora 11 - which worked - but openSUSE 11.2 cannot handle this bootrecord - so chainloading failed . Next I tried to load the openSUSE boot menu with configfile /boot/grub/menu.lst So I could start openSUSE 11.2, but boot fails because root partition is not found. This seems to be similar to #500979 - with one difference that at that time (SLED 11) only the problem on ESB2 occurred. There is also a second difference, in the previous edition (openSUSE 11.1,SLED 11) there was a problem with GPT and dmraid, which ended up, that the RAID information was destroyed (please see #436825 ) -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 13

[Bug 608457] New: screen corruption when scrolling with window in the foreground
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 28 Jul '16

28 Jul '16

http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=608457 http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=608457#c0 Summary: screen corruption when scrolling with window in the foreground Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE 11.2 Version: Final Platform: x86-64 OS/Version: openSUSE 11.2 Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Firefox AssignedTo: bnc-team-mozilla(a)forge.provo.novell.com ReportedBy: oneukum(a)novell.com QAContact: qa(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- If another window is in front of firefox's window, text exposed by scrolling firefox's window is corrupted. This happens only with firefox and regardless of what kind of window is in front. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 546843] New: gkeytool lack a support for ECC certificates
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 22 Jul '16

22 Jul '16

http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546843 User mvyskocil(a)novell.com added comment http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546843#c546468 Summary: gkeytool lack a support for ECC certificates Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE 11.2 Version: Factory Platform: Other OS/Version: Other Status: NEW Severity: Major Priority: P5 - None Component: Basesystem AssignedTo: matz(a)novell.com ReportedBy: mvyskocil(a)novell.com QAContact: qa(a)suse.de Found By: Development gkeytool fails on read ECC certificate - this is also in openjdk, but the fix adds a support for Elliptic Curve Cryptography already exists in upstream, but I did not find similar for gcc java. I read a commit log, asked on #openjdk(a)irc.oftc.net, where many openjdk and gcj developers are, but noone answered me yet. see bnc#546468 for details about openjdk The java-1_5_0-gcj-compat fails on keystore creation: + for key in '/etc/ssl/certs/*.pem' + yes ++ basename /etc/ssl/certs/COMODO_ECC_Certification_Authority.pem + gkeytool-4.4 -import -keystore cacerts -file /etc/ssl/certs/COMODO_ECC_Certification_Authority.pem -storepass '' -alias COMODO_ECC_Certification_Authority.pem keytool error: java.security.cert.CertificateException error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.cYvDZ9 (%prep) I'm going to workaround it in java-1_5_0-gcj-compat by skipping those certificates during keystore creation, to provide a fix immediately to make OpenOffice.org build immediately. But it'd be nice to have gcj with ECC support enabled. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 4

[Bug 673937] New: apache2: provide rpm macros file for 3rd party modules
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 28 Jun '16

28 Jun '16

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673937 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673937#c0 Summary: apache2: provide rpm macros file for 3rd party modules Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE 11.4 Version: Factory Platform: Other OS/Version: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Apache AssignedTo: bnc-team-apache(a)forge.provo.novell.com ReportedBy: lnussel(a)novell.com QAContact: qa(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- 3rd party modules currently have code like this in the .spec file: %define apxs /usr/sbin/apxs2 %define apache_libexecdir %(%{apxs} -q LIBEXECDIR) Stuff like that should be put into a macro file with pre-computed values. e.g. /etc/rpm/macros.apache2 that is provided by apache2-devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 4

[Bug 597744] New: alpine: Missing umlaut in date column: our_strftime does not always return utf8-encoded strings
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 28 Jun '16

28 Jun '16

http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=597744 http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=597744#c0 Summary: alpine: Missing umlaut in date column: our_strftime does not always return utf8-encoded strings Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE 11.1 Version: Final Platform: x86-64 OS/Version: openSUSE 11.1 Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Other AssignedTo: bnc-team-screening(a)forge.provo.novell.com ReportedBy: kdevel(a)vogtner.de QAContact: qa(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- User-Agent: Alpine does not correctly encode non-utf-8-data from locale's time and date formatting. Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. open console/xterm with 8-Bit character encoding (i.e. ISO-8859-1) 2. start alpine with LANG=de_DE@euro 3. have an e-mail in your inbox with a date of March. Actual Results: The Date displayed is "M" Expected Results: "Mär" strftime may return non-utf8 data if operated in a non-utf8 environment. In The non-WINDOWS-case no change of encoding to utf8 is performed in our_strftime (pith/string.c) but utf8 is expected from functions calling our_strftime. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 14

[Bug 558841] New: alpine: incorrect transformation patch included
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 28 Jun '16

28 Jun '16

http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=558841 http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=558841#c0 Summary: alpine: incorrect transformation patch included Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE 11.2 Version: Final Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Basesystem AssignedTo: bnc-team-screening(a)forge.provo.novell.com ReportedBy: jengelh(a)medozas.de QAContact: qa(a)suse.de Found By: Beta-Customer Blocker: --- In alpine's operation-may-be-undefined-warning.diff, there is: - m = strtoul (++s,(char **) &s,10); - y = (*s == ':') ? strtoul (++s,(char **) &s,10) : 0; + s++; + m = strtoul (s,(char **) &s,10); + s++; + y = (*s == ':') ? strtoul (s,(char **) &s,10) : 0; But the last two + lines seem wrong. SUSE is incrementing s here before the test for ':', while the original patch only did it _after_. It should probably have been: s++; m = strtoul(s, (char **)&s, 10); if (*s == ':') { ++s; y = strtoul(s, (char **)&s, 10); } else { y = 0; } -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 11

[Bug 659905] New: Error in GRUB installation & configuration
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 20 May '16

20 May '16

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=659905 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=659905#c0 Summary: Error in GRUB installation & configuration Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE 11.4 Version: Milestone 4 of 6 Platform: i686 OS/Version: Other Status: NEW Severity: Critical Priority: P5 - None Component: Bootloader AssignedTo: jsrain(a)novell.com ReportedBy: lassaad(a)pochta.ru QAContact: jsrain(a)novell.com Found By: --- Blocker: --- User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101026 SUSE/3.6.12-1.2 Firefox/3.6.12 In the Bootloader installation procedure I get an error, so I can't instal GRUB, I've tried many installation option like install on MBR, on sda, on /root but it doesn't work. so I quit installation and when I try to install GRUB manually I get the same error. There are some screenshots of my installation: This is my partitions setup http://yfrog.com/0rdiskpartitionsp My installation setting http://yfrog.com/5einstallationsettingsp GRUB installation ERROR http://yfrog.com/1gerrorgrubp Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1.start live USB installation (my CD-ROM is broken) 2.set my "/" on sda5 (ext4) 3.wait until the GRUB error appear in the end of installation Actual Results: when I restart, no GRUB, I get error " no operating system... " and in the /boot directory, there is no vmlinuz or initrd files. only mbr.backup and grub folder. Expected Results: setup the GRUB, and end the installation. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 14

[Bug 601779] New: 32bit 'tree' doesn't show files 2GB and larger
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 28 Apr '16

28 Apr '16

http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=601779 http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=601779#c0 Summary: 32bit 'tree' doesn't show files 2GB and larger Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE 11.2 Version: Final Platform: x86 OS/Version: openSUSE 11.2 Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Other AssignedTo: bnc-team-screening(a)forge.provo.novell.com ReportedBy: jc(a)ymmv.dk QAContact: qa(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100317 SUSE/3.5.9-0.1.1 Firefox/3.5.9 Hi On 32bit systems the 'tree' command dosn't show 'large' files. I have tested on a 64bit system as well, and the problem is only present on 32bit systems. I have done a fair amount of research, comparing compile-time arguments with those of 32bit Debian packages. In the end I think it comes down to the 'spec' file: In tree.spec the 'make' command is: %build make CFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" -which overrides the CFLAGS set in the Makefile: CFLAGS=-O2 -Wall -fomit-frame-pointer -DLINUX -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -which results in the binary being built with these flags instead: RPM_OPT_FLAGS="-O2 -g -m32 -march=i586 -mtune=i686 -fmessage-length=0 -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fstack-protector -funwind-tables -fasynchronous-unwind-tables" Now; If I change the spec file so that; %build make -then the compiler gets the flags as set in the Makefile, and the resulting binary works with files larger than 2G. I'm guessing that it's desirable to get $RPM_OPT_FLAGS passed to the compiler, but I'm unsure as to how one would 'merge' this variable with $CFLAGS from the Makefile? As for the severity of the bug: It doesn't break the system, but the functionality of the command is seriously hampered by this. It seems reasonable (to me) that it's a packaging bug, and therefore it should be easily fixed. I have confirmation from the opensuse(a)opensuse.org list that the bug is present on 11.0, so it seems to be an 'old' problem... Kind Regards, Jon Clausen Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. get or create a file larger than 2GB I used 'dd' to create two files - one 2GB, one 1KB smaller: dd if=/dev/zero of=2G bs=1k count=2097152 dd if=/dev/zero of=2G-1k bs=1k count=2097151 2. use 'tree /path/to/large/file' 3. observe output Actual Results: output from 32bit system: jon@nx8220:~> ll tmp/largefiles/ total 4194304 -rw-r--r-- 1 jon users 2147483648 2010-04-30 12:50 2G -rw-r--r-- 1 jon users 2147482624 2010-04-30 12:52 2G-1k jon@nx8220:~> tree tmp/largefiles/ tmp/largefiles/ `-- 2G-1k 0 directories, 1 file Expected Results: output from 64bit system: jon@cnu8092slm:~> ll tmp/largefiles/ total 4194304 -rw-r--r-- 1 jon users 2147483648 2010-04-30 12:58 2G -rw-r--r-- 1 jon users 2147482624 2010-04-30 12:58 2G-1k jon@cnu8092slm:~> tree tmp/largefiles/ tmp/largefiles/ |-- 2G `-- 2G-1k 0 directories, 2 files AFAICT the flag that makes the difference is -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 - which makes the binary use *stat64() rather than *stat() when files are 'large'. On 64bit systems I suppose everything uses *stat64() anyways, which is why the problem only surfaces on 32bit systems... ? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 17

[Bug 578994] New: hwinfo cuts off list of cpu features
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 28 Apr '16

28 Apr '16

http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=578994 http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=578994#c0 Summary: hwinfo cuts off list of cpu features Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE 11.3 Version: Factory Platform: x86-64 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Other AssignedTo: bnc-team-screening(a)forge.provo.novell.com ReportedBy: HMWiesinger(a)gmx.at QAContact: qa(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; Konqueror/4.3; Linux) KHTML/4.3.1 (like Gecko) The list of supported features is cut off at some point. hwinfo (16.10) shows the following list: Features: fpu,vme,de,pse,tsc,msr,pae,mce,cx8,apic,sep,mtrr,pge,mca,cmov,pat,pse36, clflush,dts,acpi,mmx,fxsr,sse,sse2,ss,ht,tm,pbe,syscall,nx,lm,constant_tsc, arch_perfmon,pebs,bts,rep_good,aperfmperf,pni,dtes64,monitor,ds_cpl,vmx, smx,est,tm2,ssse3,cx16,xtpr,pdcm,sse whereas "cat /proc/cpuinfo" shows: fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe syscall nx lm constant_tsc arch_perfmon pebs bts rep_good aperfmperf pni dtes64 monitor ds_cpl vmx smx est tm2 ssse3 cx16 xtpr pdcm sse4_1 xsave lahf_lm ida tpr_shadow vnmi flexpriority Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. hwinfo --cpu 2. cat /proc/cpuinfo 3. compare output -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 6