When will 9.3 FTP Install be available?
My poor Shuttle XPC AMD64 has not had SuSE installed since 9.1 because of the SATA drivers and the Nvidia chipset drivers, and no DVD drive. :) -- R.
Fredag 03 juni 2005 16:03 skrev Ron Lau:
My poor Shuttle XPC AMD64 has not had SuSE installed since 9.1 because of the SATA drivers and the Nvidia chipset drivers, and no DVD drive.
They actually made a seperate x86_64 DVD iso file to address some/all of these issues a while back. Maybe you should watch in the personal folders of Andreas Jaeger ftp://ftp.suse.com/pub/people/aj/ Johan
:)
-- R.
Fredag 03 juni 2005 19:29 skrev Johan Nielsen:
Fredag 03 juni 2005 16:03 skrev Ron Lau:
My poor Shuttle XPC AMD64 has not had SuSE installed since 9.1 because of the SATA drivers and the Nvidia chipset drivers, and no DVD drive.
They actually made a seperate x86_64 DVD iso file to address some/all of these issues a while back. Maybe you should watch in the personal folders of Andreas Jaeger ftp://ftp.suse.com/pub/people/aj/
Johan
AHA .... you did try .... Please just to the list ;-) what chipsets/OEM boards are we dealing with .... ?? Johan
:)
-- R.
All issues are fixed in 9.3 (nvida chipset for sata and eth). but I have no dvd drive and no network to put the x86_64 files onto so I have to either install the 32bit version from the CD's or wait for the ftp install. :( R. On Fri, 2005-06-03 at 14:40 -0500, Johan Nielsen wrote:
Fredag 03 juni 2005 19:29 skrev Johan Nielsen:
Fredag 03 juni 2005 16:03 skrev Ron Lau:
My poor Shuttle XPC AMD64 has not had SuSE installed since 9.1 because of the SATA drivers and the Nvidia chipset drivers, and no DVD drive.
They actually made a seperate x86_64 DVD iso file to address some/all of these issues a while back. Maybe you should watch in the personal folders of Andreas Jaeger ftp://ftp.suse.com/pub/people/aj/
Johan
AHA .... you did try ....
Please just to the list ;-)
what chipsets/OEM boards are we dealing with .... ??
Johan
:)
-- R.
-- R.
Mandag 06 juni 2005 17:35 skrev Ron Lau:
All issues are fixed in 9.3 (nvida chipset for sata and eth). but I have no dvd drive and no network to put the x86_64 files onto so I have to either install the 32bit version from the CD's or wait for the ftp install.
Well possible solution while you juggle with impatience and the like. Make a partiton on a drive where it fits. Take that drive to a PC with a DVD drive that swallows the SuSE DVD's. Install the drive there for the duration of the copying of the DVD to the drive. Organize things properly and you install from that partition when you're back at your regular PC again and installed the drive back ;-) Annoying but is known to work ;-) Johan
:(
R.
On Fri, 2005-06-03 at 14:40 -0500, Johan Nielsen wrote:
Fredag 03 juni 2005 19:29 skrev Johan Nielsen:
Fredag 03 juni 2005 16:03 skrev Ron Lau:
My poor Shuttle XPC AMD64 has not had SuSE installed since 9.1 because of the SATA drivers and the Nvidia chipset drivers, and no DVD drive.
They actually made a seperate x86_64 DVD iso file to address some/all of these issues a while back. Maybe you should watch in the personal folders of Andreas Jaeger ftp://ftp.suse.com/pub/people/aj/
Johan
AHA .... you did try ....
Please just to the list ;-)
what chipsets/OEM boards are we dealing with .... ??
Johan
:)
-- R.
-- R.
Hello, I tried to install Suse 9.3 on Microsoft's Virtual Server 2005 (hosted on Win 2003 server) and I failed. Did anyone ever tried this successfully? (Or am I the only one foolish enought to...) Somehow there are linux virtualization technologies not supporting Windows and there is windows virtualization technology not supporting linux. Having a technology available that could convince both worlds to run on one server would help... regards, einar
Ihhhhh, As i know Linux on MS Virtual Server don't runs. Isn't it?? On Virtual Server runs only MS sh.. :-) Use VMWare. Here you get all of Linux and BSD's running Friendly regards Andreas -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: einar_linux [mailto:einar_linux@swissonline.ch] Gesendet: Freitag, 3. Juni 2005 20:13 Cc: suse-amd64@suse.com Betreff: [suse-amd64] M$ Virtual Server 2005 Hello, I tried to install Suse 9.3 on Microsoft's Virtual Server 2005 (hosted on Win 2003 server) and I failed. Did anyone ever tried this successfully? (Or am I the only one foolish enought to...) Somehow there are linux virtualization technologies not supporting Windows and there is windows virtualization technology not supporting linux. Having a technology available that could convince both worlds to run on one server would help... regards, einar -- Check the List-Unsubscribe header to unsubscribe For additional commands, email: suse-amd64-help@suse.com
On Fri, Jun 03, 2005 at 08:13:02PM +0200, einar_linux wrote:
Hello,
I tried to install Suse 9.3 on Microsoft's Virtual Server 2005 (hosted on Win 2003 server) and I failed. Did anyone ever tried this successfully? (Or am I the only one foolish enought to...)
How did it fail? I dont know much about Virtual Server, but if you could configure a virtual serial interface and then boot linux with console=ttyS0,baud and send the log file then we might be able to figure out what is wrong.
Somehow there are linux virtualization technologies not supporting Windows and there is windows virtualization technology not supporting linux. Having a technology available that could convince both worlds to run on one server would help...
It might be simple bugs on the one or other side. With a proper report it might be possible to do something for the next release. -Andi
Andi Kleen wrote:
On Fri, Jun 03, 2005 at 08:13:02PM +0200, einar_linux wrote:
Hello,
I tried to install Suse 9.3 on Microsoft's Virtual Server 2005 (hosted on Win 2003 server) and I failed. Did anyone ever tried this successfully? (Or am I the only one foolish enought to...)
I didn't install directly onto Virtual Server 2005 but I did succesfully boot up a virtual hard disk with 9.3 I had installed under Virtual PC, on Virtual Server on XP.
It ran, but very slowly, even slower than under VPC. not sure why but 9.3 seems to run very slowly on VPC compared to 9.2. on Virtual server, I suspect the speed issue was partly due to the awful ActiveX (or whatever) console. Perhaps if you were running with no Gui and just connecting over the LAN, the performance may appear better. Virtual Server stayed on my laptop for about 30 minutes before I deleted it and went back to virtual PC as it just wasn't suitable for what I was doing.
Hello, On the M$ message board, a microsoft guy brought up that they have a problem with virtual servers using more than around 650 MB of memory. Since I used 1 GB, my server did not run. After reconfiguring towards 512 MB my virtual server run smoothly (Suse 9.3 installed nicely). MS claims that the next service pack for the virtual server should resolve the issue. regards, einar Andi Kleen wrote:
On Fri, Jun 03, 2005 at 08:13:02PM +0200, einar_linux wrote:
Hello,
I tried to install Suse 9.3 on Microsoft's Virtual Server 2005 (hosted on Win 2003 server) and I failed. Did anyone ever tried this successfully? (Or am I the only one foolish enought to...)
How did it fail? I dont know much about Virtual Server, but if you could configure a virtual serial interface and then boot linux with console=ttyS0,baud and send the log file then we might be able to figure out what is wrong.
Somehow there are linux virtualization technologies not supporting Windows and there is windows virtualization technology not supporting linux. Having a technology available that could convince both worlds to run on one server would help...
It might be simple bugs on the one or other side. With a proper report it might be possible to do something for the next release.
-Andi
einar_linux wrote:
Hello,
On the M$ message board, a microsoft guy brought up that they have a problem with virtual servers using more than around 650 MB of memory. Since I used 1 GB, my server did not run. After reconfiguring towards 512 MB my virtual server run smoothly (Suse 9.3 installed nicely). MS claims that the next service pack for the virtual server should resolve the issue.
I know its probably a bit off topic but, do you know if this memory issue affects all guest O/S or just non Microsoft?.
participants (6)
-
Andi Kleen -
Andreas Wahlert -
Edwin Heath -
einar_linux -
Johan Nielsen -
Ron Lau