RE: [suse-amd64] Quad opteron performance issues in suse 9
Hi Andreas, here is the error that the test kernel gives on boot:
VFS: cannot open root device "sda2" or unknown block (2,0)
Thats the panic error, the reiser file system and megaraid controller had
loaded prior to the error. I installed mkinitrd-1.0-110.x86_64.rpm update
from the /pub/people/kraxel.
Any ideas?
-----Original Message-----
From: Jason Clark [mailto:jason@anandtech.com]
Sent: Sunday, January 25, 2004 2:54 PM
To: 'Andreas Jaeger'
Cc: 'suse-amd64@suse.com'
Subject: RE: [suse-amd64] Quad opteron performance issues in suse 9
If you mean this readme: ftp://ftp.suse.com/pub/people/kraxel/README
No, I just rpm installed the kernel and rebooted. Excuse the lack of
experience, some questions:
1. Where does one find these updated rpms? I found
mkinitrd-1.0-110.x86_64.rpm, but can't find aaa_base or modutils.
2. after those modules are installed is it just rpm -Uvh kernel.rpm?
When I ran it the first time it updated the bootloader itself. Again excuse
the basic questions, but this is a first for me.
Cheers
-----Original Message-----
From: Andreas Jaeger [mailto:aj@suse.de]
Sent: Sunday, January 25, 2004 2:34 PM
To: Jason Clark
Cc: suse-amd64@suse.com
Subject: Re: [suse-amd64] Quad opteron performance issues in suse 9
"Jason Clark"
Yep, I gave kernel-smp-26-2.6.1-5.x86_64.rpm a try and got a kernel mode panic, something about the file system. I'm using an lsi logic 320-2
With the exact message, we might be able to help. I hope you set up the modules according to the README.
megaraid controller, suse is installed on a resier file system on an array off the lsi logic.
And that lsi logic is loaded correctly? Andreas
Cheers.
-----Original Message----- From: Andreas Jaeger [mailto:aj@suse.de] Sent: Sunday, January 25, 2004 2:04 PM To: Jason Clark Subject: Re: [suse-amd64] Quad opteron performance issues in suse 9
"Jason Clark"
writes: Are there any 2.6 kernels available for suse 9, pre-built? Haven't had a whole lot of luck building one.
Yes, there are - in ftp.suse.com/pub/people/kraxel
Andreas
Cheers
-----Original Message----- From: Andreas Jaeger [mailto:aj@suse.de] Sent: Sunday, January 25, 2004 9:37 AM To: Jason Clark Cc: suse-amd64@suse.com Subject: Re: [suse-amd64] Quad opteron performance issues in suse 9
"Jason Clark"
writes: I've been playing around with Suse 9 AMD64 for the past few days, trying some canned benchmarks and one that we've constructed. So far, I'm not seeing any scaling from a dual opteron to a quad opteron on suse 9. Most of the tests I've tried are based off of mysql. During the quad cpu tests each cpu was averaging at least 90%, same as the dual cpu tests. Is the 2.4 kernel ok for quad opterons, or is 2.6 required?
The kernel is fine for 4 ways and it scales with our experiments.
The 2.6 kernel is far less locks than 2.4 so depending on your tests, updating might make a difference.
A side issue, for some reason you cannot install the rpm binaries of
mysql
4.0.17 without getting a segmentation fault. So all of the mysql testing
Please tell that to those that did the rpms...
was done on 4.0.15, included with suse 9.
-- Andreas Jaeger, aj@suse.de, http://www.suse.de/~aj SuSE Linux AG, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126
"Jason Clark"
Hi Andreas, here is the error that the test kernel gives on boot:
VFS: cannot open root device "sda2" or unknown block (2,0)
Thats the panic error, the reiser file system and megaraid controller had loaded prior to the error. I installed mkinitrd-1.0-110.x86_64.rpm update from the /pub/people/kraxel.
Any ideas?
Missing module for the disk. You did not update modules.conf correctly, Andreas
-----Original Message----- From: Jason Clark [mailto:jason@anandtech.com] Sent: Sunday, January 25, 2004 2:54 PM To: 'Andreas Jaeger' Cc: 'suse-amd64@suse.com' Subject: RE: [suse-amd64] Quad opteron performance issues in suse 9
If you mean this readme: ftp://ftp.suse.com/pub/people/kraxel/README
No, I just rpm installed the kernel and rebooted. Excuse the lack of experience, some questions:
1. Where does one find these updated rpms? I found mkinitrd-1.0-110.x86_64.rpm, but can't find aaa_base or modutils.
2. after those modules are installed is it just rpm -Uvh kernel.rpm?
When I ran it the first time it updated the bootloader itself. Again excuse the basic questions, but this is a first for me.
Cheers
-----Original Message----- From: Andreas Jaeger [mailto:aj@suse.de] Sent: Sunday, January 25, 2004 2:34 PM To: Jason Clark Cc: suse-amd64@suse.com Subject: Re: [suse-amd64] Quad opteron performance issues in suse 9
"Jason Clark"
writes: Yep, I gave kernel-smp-26-2.6.1-5.x86_64.rpm a try and got a kernel mode panic, something about the file system. I'm using an lsi logic 320-2
With the exact message, we might be able to help. I hope you set up the modules according to the README.
megaraid controller, suse is installed on a resier file system on an array off the lsi logic.
And that lsi logic is loaded correctly?
Andreas
Cheers.
-----Original Message----- From: Andreas Jaeger [mailto:aj@suse.de] Sent: Sunday, January 25, 2004 2:04 PM To: Jason Clark Subject: Re: [suse-amd64] Quad opteron performance issues in suse 9
"Jason Clark"
writes: Are there any 2.6 kernels available for suse 9, pre-built? Haven't had a whole lot of luck building one.
Yes, there are - in ftp.suse.com/pub/people/kraxel
Andreas
Cheers
-----Original Message----- From: Andreas Jaeger [mailto:aj@suse.de] Sent: Sunday, January 25, 2004 9:37 AM To: Jason Clark Cc: suse-amd64@suse.com Subject: Re: [suse-amd64] Quad opteron performance issues in suse 9
"Jason Clark"
writes: I've been playing around with Suse 9 AMD64 for the past few days, trying some canned benchmarks and one that we've constructed. So far, I'm not seeing any scaling from a dual opteron to a quad opteron on suse 9. Most of the tests I've tried are based off of mysql. During the quad cpu tests each cpu was averaging at least 90%, same as the dual cpu tests. Is the 2.4 kernel ok for quad opterons, or is 2.6 required?
The kernel is fine for 4 ways and it scales with our experiments.
The 2.6 kernel is far less locks than 2.4 so depending on your tests, updating might make a difference.
A side issue, for some reason you cannot install the rpm binaries of
mysql
4.0.17 without getting a segmentation fault. So all of the mysql testing
Please tell that to those that did the rpms...
was done on 4.0.15, included with suse 9.
Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger, aj@suse.de, http://www.suse.de/~aj SuSE Linux AG, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126
I did everything that was in kraxels readme? What else do you have to do?.
-----Original Message-----
From: Andreas Jaeger [mailto:aj@suse.de]
Sent: Monday, January 26, 2004 12:55 AM
To: Jason Clark
Cc: suse-amd64@suse.com; kraxel@suse.de
Subject: Re: [suse-amd64] Quad opteron performance issues in suse 9
"Jason Clark"
Hi Andreas, here is the error that the test kernel gives on boot:
VFS: cannot open root device "sda2" or unknown block (2,0)
Thats the panic error, the reiser file system and megaraid controller had loaded prior to the error. I installed mkinitrd-1.0-110.x86_64.rpm update from the /pub/people/kraxel.
Any ideas?
-----Original Message----- From: Jason Clark [mailto:jason@anandtech.com] Sent: Sunday, January 25, 2004 2:54 PM To: 'Andreas Jaeger' Cc: 'suse-amd64@suse.com' Subject: RE: [suse-amd64] Quad opteron performance issues in suse 9
If you mean this readme: ftp://ftp.suse.com/pub/people/kraxel/README
No, I just rpm installed the kernel and rebooted. Excuse the lack of experience, some questions:
1. Where does one find these updated rpms? I found mkinitrd-1.0-110.x86_64.rpm, but can't find aaa_base or modutils.
2. after those modules are installed is it just rpm -Uvh kernel.rpm?
When I ran it the first time it updated the bootloader itself. Again excuse the basic questions, but this is a first for me.
Cheers
-----Original Message----- From: Andreas Jaeger [mailto:aj@suse.de] Sent: Sunday, January 25, 2004 2:34 PM To: Jason Clark Cc: suse-amd64@suse.com Subject: Re: [suse-amd64] Quad opteron performance issues in suse 9
"Jason Clark"
writes: Yep, I gave kernel-smp-26-2.6.1-5.x86_64.rpm a try and got a kernel mode panic, something about the file system. I'm using an lsi logic 320-2
With the exact message, we might be able to help. I hope you set up the modules according to the README.
megaraid controller, suse is installed on a resier file system on an array off the lsi logic.
And that lsi logic is loaded correctly?
Andreas
Cheers.
-----Original Message----- From: Andreas Jaeger [mailto:aj@suse.de] Sent: Sunday, January 25, 2004 2:04 PM To: Jason Clark Subject: Re: [suse-amd64] Quad opteron performance issues in suse 9
"Jason Clark"
writes: Are there any 2.6 kernels available for suse 9, pre-built? Haven't had a whole lot of luck building one.
Yes, there are - in ftp.suse.com/pub/people/kraxel
Andreas
Cheers
-----Original Message----- From: Andreas Jaeger [mailto:aj@suse.de] Sent: Sunday, January 25, 2004 9:37 AM To: Jason Clark Cc: suse-amd64@suse.com Subject: Re: [suse-amd64] Quad opteron performance issues in suse 9
"Jason Clark"
writes: I've been playing around with Suse 9 AMD64 for the past few days,
Missing module for the disk. You did not update modules.conf correctly, Andreas trying
some canned benchmarks and one that we've constructed. So far, I'm not seeing any scaling from a dual opteron to a quad opteron on suse 9. Most of the tests I've tried are based off of mysql. During the quad cpu tests each cpu was averaging at least 90%, same as the dual cpu tests. Is the 2.4 kernel ok for quad opterons, or is 2.6 required?
The kernel is fine for 4 ways and it scales with our experiments.
The 2.6 kernel is far less locks than 2.4 so depending on your tests, updating might make a difference.
A side issue, for some reason you cannot install the rpm binaries of
mysql
4.0.17 without getting a segmentation fault. So all of the mysql testing
Please tell that to those that did the rpms...
was done on 4.0.15, included with suse 9.
Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger, aj@suse.de, http://www.suse.de/~aj SuSE Linux AG, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126
participants (2)
-
Andreas Jaeger
-
Jason Clark