memtest from sles9?
Does this work for anyone? I've got some hosts that I wanted to run it on, tried via pxe, and now from the SLES9 cd1.. all 3 hosts panic immediately, even the one host that I know is fine. -- Mike Marion-Unix SysAdmin/Staff Engineer-http://www.qualcomm.com My pid is Inigo Montoya. You kill -9 my parent process. Prepare to vi.
same problem here. I believe there is a known issue with the memtest packaged with Suse 9.x and x86_64. The latest memtest worked fine. (memtest downloaded from memtest86.org) On Thu, 2004-10-14 at 20:18, mmarion@qualcomm.com wrote:
Does this work for anyone? I've got some hosts that I wanted to run it on, tried via pxe, and now from the SLES9 cd1.. all 3 hosts panic immediately, even the one host that I know is fine.
-- Mike Marion-Unix SysAdmin/Staff Engineer-http://www.qualcomm.com My pid is Inigo Montoya. You kill -9 my parent process. Prepare to vi. -- Johannes Ullrich jullrich@euclidian.com contact: http://johannes.homepc.org/contact.htm
Johannes B. Ullrich wrote:
same problem here. I believe there is a known issue with the memtest packaged with Suse 9.x and x86_64. The latest memtest worked fine. (memtest downloaded from memtest86.org)
On Thu, 2004-10-14 at 20:18, mmarion@qualcomm.com wrote:
Does this work for anyone? I've got some hosts that I wanted to run it on, tried via pxe, and now from the SLES9 cd1.. all 3 hosts panic immediately, even the one host that I know is fine.
-- Mike Marion-Unix SysAdmin/Staff Engineer-http://www.qualcomm.com My pid is Inigo Montoya. You kill -9 my parent process. Prepare to vi.
Was that the precompiled one (that worked fine) or did you compile it up yourself ? TIA
I used the precompiled bootable ISO from this page: http://www.memtest86.com/#download1
Was that the precompiled one (that worked fine) or did you compile it up yourself ? TIA -- Johannes Ullrich jullrich@euclidian.com contact: http://johannes.homepc.org/contact.htm
Johannes B. Ullrich wrote:
I used the precompiled bootable ISO from this page: http://www.memtest86.com/#download1
what about memtest+, at http://www.memtest.org i dont know about the current memtest sles9 problems, but i asked suse back in suselinux 9.0 64bit days that there wasnt any memtest on their media back then, and they promised an updated one for 9.1. i dont remember any more, but if i am not mistaken the 64bit 9.1 media also had some problems with memtest, or memtest wasnt even included on those either.. just found my older postings to the list about memtest [1] http://lists.suse.com/archive/suse-amd64/2004-Feb/0048.html [2] http://lists.suse.com/archive/suse-amd64/2004-Apr/0229.html will suse 9.2 improve in this area?
[Note to all: I work for AMD and have come across this problem, but am
not any kind of official spokesman so Caveat Emptor, etc...]
Andreas Bittner
Johannes B. Ullrich wrote:
I used the precompiled bootable ISO from this page: http://www.memtest86.com/#download1
what about memtest+, at http://www.memtest.org
i dont know about the current memtest sles9 problems, but i asked suse back in suselinux 9.0 64bit days that there wasnt any memtest on their media back then, and they promised an updated one for 9.1. i dont remember any more, but if i am not mistaken the 64bit 9.1 media also had some problems with memtest, or memtest wasnt even included on those either..
just found my older postings to the list about memtest
[1] http://lists.suse.com/archive/suse-amd64/2004-Feb/0048.html [2] http://lists.suse.com/archive/suse-amd64/2004-Apr/0229.html
will suse 9.2 improve in this area?
I think the "www.memtest86.com" site now reflects the work done in
the "memtest+" team at "www.memtest.org".
In any case using Memtest 3.1x or the Memtest+ versions should both
work fine on Athlon64 or Opteron boxes, and I do so all the time.
My SuSE 9.1 install had an old version of memtest.bin with same kind
of crash problems, and I just got the source, compiled in the most
obvious way, then dropped the new "memtest.bin" in my /boot directory,
and it worked fine.
--
Erich Stefan Boleyn
Hi,
I was trying to compile a version from www.memtest.org, memtest86+-1.27,
and I got the following error on my SuSE 9,
gcc -E -traditional head.S -o head.s
as -o head.o head.s
head.S: Assembler messages:
head.S:42: Error: cannot represent relocation type BFD_RELOC_386_GOTPC
head.S:43: Error: cannot represent relocation type BFD_RELOC_386_GOTOFF
head.S:49: Error: cannot represent relocation type BFD_RELOC_386_GOTPC
head.S:52: Error: cannot represent relocation type BFD_RELOC_386_GOTOFF
head.S:55: Error: cannot represent relocation type BFD_RELOC_386_GOTOFF
... more of the same ...
Was wondering how did you resolve this problem?
Thanks,
Kian Chang.
Erich Boleyn
Johannes B. Ullrich wrote:
I used the precompiled bootable ISO from this page: http://www.memtest86.com/#download1
what about memtest+, at http://www.memtest.org
i dont know about the current memtest sles9 problems, but i asked suse back in suselinux 9.0 64bit days that there wasnt any memtest on their media back then, and they promised an updated one for 9.1. i dont remember any more, but if i am not mistaken the 64bit 9.1 media also had
some problems with memtest, or memtest wasnt even included on those either..
just found my older postings to the list about memtest
[1] http://lists.suse.com/archive/suse-amd64/2004-Feb/0048.html [2] http://lists.suse.com/archive/suse-amd64/2004-Apr/0229.html
will suse 9.2 improve in this area?
I think the "www.memtest86.com" site now reflects the work done in
the "memtest+" team at "www.memtest.org".
In any case using Memtest 3.1x or the Memtest+ versions should both
work fine on Athlon64 or Opteron boxes, and I do so all the time.
My SuSE 9.1 install had an old version of memtest.bin with same kind
of crash problems, and I just got the source, compiled in the most
obvious way, then dropped the new "memtest.bin" in my /boot directory,
and it worked fine.
--
Erich Stefan Boleyn
Kian_Chang_Low@veritasdgc.com writes:
1. (*) text/plain
Hi,
I was trying to compile a version from www.memtest.org, memtest86+-1.27, and I got the following error on my SuSE 9,
gcc -E -traditional head.S -o head.s
gcc -m32...
as -o head.o head.s
head.S: Assembler messages: head.S:42: Error: cannot represent relocation type BFD_RELOC_386_GOTPC head.S:43: Error: cannot represent relocation type BFD_RELOC_386_GOTOFF head.S:49: Error: cannot represent relocation type BFD_RELOC_386_GOTPC head.S:52: Error: cannot represent relocation type BFD_RELOC_386_GOTOFF head.S:55: Error: cannot represent relocation type BFD_RELOC_386_GOTOFF ... more of the same ...
Was wondering how did you resolve this problem?
Thanks, Kian Chang.
Erich Boleyn
10/15/2004 11:04 PM To suse-amd64@suse.com, Andreas Bittner
cc Subject Re: [suse-amd64] memtest on suse media (was: Re: [suse-amd64] memtest from sles9?)
[Note to all: I work for AMD and have come across this problem, but am not any kind of official spokesman so Caveat Emptor, etc...]
Andreas Bittner
wrote: Johannes B. Ullrich wrote:
I used the precompiled bootable ISO from this page: http://www.memtest86.com/#download1
what about memtest+, at http://www.memtest.org
i dont know about the current memtest sles9 problems, but i asked suse back in suselinux 9.0 64bit days that there wasnt any memtest on their media back then, and they promised an updated one for 9.1. i dont remember any more, but if i am not mistaken the 64bit 9.1 media also had
some problems with memtest, or memtest wasnt even included on those either..
just found my older postings to the list about memtest
[1] http://lists.suse.com/archive/suse-amd64/2004-Feb/0048.html [2] http://lists.suse.com/archive/suse-amd64/2004-Apr/0229.html
will suse 9.2 improve in this area?
I think the "www.memtest86.com" site now reflects the work done in the "memtest+" team at "www.memtest.org".
In any case using Memtest 3.1x or the Memtest+ versions should both work fine on Athlon64 or Opteron boxes, and I do so all the time.
My SuSE 9.1 install had an old version of memtest.bin with same kind of crash problems, and I just got the source, compiled in the most obvious way, then dropped the new "memtest.bin" in my /boot directory, and it worked fine.
-- Erich Stefan Boleyn
http://www.uruk.org/ "Reality is truly stranger than fiction; Probably why fiction is so popular"
Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger, aj@suse.de, http://www.suse.de/~aj SUSE Linux AG, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126
participants (7)
-
Andreas Bittner
-
Andreas Jaeger
-
Erich Boleyn
-
Johannes B. Ullrich
-
Kian_Chang_Low@veritasdgc.com
-
mmarion@qualcomm.com
-
William A. Mahaffey III