Mailinglist Archive: opensuse (3156 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [opensuse] cluster solutions ?
- From: Aaron Kulkis <akulkis00@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 01 Dec 2007 11:05:53 -0500
- Message-id: <47518661.80707@xxxxxxxxxx>
Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
I should have said that a very old method was by
using the a, b, and c runlevels.
Every clustering product I've ever seen has been an
expansion of the regular run-levels, basically adding
a "cluster-state" on top of the run-level state.
It's a very, very old method.
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
On 2007-11-27T06:35:36, Aaron Kulkis <akulkis00@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Clustering just makes use of the normally unused
"a" "b" and "c" runlevels.
That's a very special example of clustering. I've never seen a cluster
product which did; which one do you have in mind?
I should have said that a very old method was by
using the a, b, and c runlevels.
Every clustering product I've ever seen has been an
expansion of the regular run-levels, basically adding
a "cluster-state" on top of the run-level state.
For a two-host cluster, you can
completely implement the cluster
with runlevels a, b, and c.
Run level a for normal cluster operations.
Run level b for when the other host is down.
Run level c for deliberately leaving the cluster.
Certainly an interesting approach, yes.
It's a very, very old method.
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
| < Previous | Next > |