Mailinglist Archive: opensuse (4570 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
LILO vs GRUB
- From: "Matt Stamm" <mattsl@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2005 14:37:29 +0000 (UTC)
- Message-id: <200511020639.AA362348848@xxxxxxxxx>
I'm recent pruchased a new PC with a single SATA drive.
I was unable to install SUSE to this PC using the default
install. Every install attempt resulted in a GRUB error
on the initial boot after the first CD. Changing the
bootloader from GRUB to LILO fixed the problem and
resulted in a successfull install.
I'm concerned that I could not install SUSE with the
default settings. It appears that SUSE, and the Linux
community prefers GRUB and that GRUB is a more powerful
bootloader than LILO. I do not plan on having any other
OS on this PC other than SUSE.
Should I be concerned that I could not use GRUB?
What is the downside to using LILO instead of GRUB ?
Any advise or comment would be appreciated.
Matt
I was unable to install SUSE to this PC using the default
install. Every install attempt resulted in a GRUB error
on the initial boot after the first CD. Changing the
bootloader from GRUB to LILO fixed the problem and
resulted in a successfull install.
I'm concerned that I could not install SUSE with the
default settings. It appears that SUSE, and the Linux
community prefers GRUB and that GRUB is a more powerful
bootloader than LILO. I do not plan on having any other
OS on this PC other than SUSE.
Should I be concerned that I could not use GRUB?
What is the downside to using LILO instead of GRUB ?
Any advise or comment would be appreciated.
Matt
| < Previous | Next > |