Mailinglist Archive: opensuse (4570 mails)

< Previous Next >
Re: [SLE] LILO vs GRUB
  • From: "Carlos E. R." <robin1.listas@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2005 19:21:33 +0000 (UTC)
  • Message-id: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0511021920100.10038@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


The Wednesday 2005-11-02 at 06:39 -0800, Matt Stamm wrote:

> Should I be concerned that I could not use GRUB?

I don't think so, not really. I find lilo easier to understand, but grub
is more confortable... when it works.

> What is the downside to using LILO instead of GRUB ?

That you need to run 'lilo' after doing any change to the bootloader
configuration or a kernel update or change. Grub doesn't need that.

Grub can read directly from the filesystem, so it can read the menu and
other files directly during boot. On the other hand, lilo can not do
that, it needs a map to find those things it needs being compiled before
hand (by running the 'lilo' command).

- --
Cheers,
Carlos Robinson

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Made with pgp4pine 1.76

iD8DBQFDaQSItTMYHG2NR9URAsBCAJ0d8Dm3FboavWfyRE4UobUgV0nZbwCeIQr7
ipwehfUlwxTfmU8n7/tsosI=
=Wf1x
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


< Previous Next >
References