Mailinglist Archive: opensuse (4570 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [SLE] Goodbye Hubert...
- From: "Steven T. Hatton" <hattons@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 09:12:31 +0000 (UTC)
- Message-id: <200511100412.16676.hattons@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
On Thursday 10 November 2005 04:08 am, Kevin Donnelly wrote:
> On Thursday 10 November 2005 05:38, Steven T. Hatton wrote:
> > I don't believe Novell execs
> > quite understand what "free" in free software means.
>
> It's very sad that Dr Mantel has gone, and I also salute him for his work
> on SuSE down the years. However, the above sentence is not entirely fair -
> after all, Novell has opensourced all of SUSE for the first time, and
> started opensuse (it could be argued that this should have been done about
> 3 years ago, and Novell didn't own the company then).
There was nothing wrong with SuSE retaining control of YaST. I said much
about this in the past. The fact that there is free software does _not_ mean
that all software must be free. SuSE provided the source for YaST, and were
very careful about conforming to published and agreed upon industry
standards.
Steven
> On Thursday 10 November 2005 05:38, Steven T. Hatton wrote:
> > I don't believe Novell execs
> > quite understand what "free" in free software means.
>
> It's very sad that Dr Mantel has gone, and I also salute him for his work
> on SuSE down the years. However, the above sentence is not entirely fair -
> after all, Novell has opensourced all of SUSE for the first time, and
> started opensuse (it could be argued that this should have been done about
> 3 years ago, and Novell didn't own the company then).
There was nothing wrong with SuSE retaining control of YaST. I said much
about this in the past. The fact that there is free software does _not_ mean
that all software must be free. SuSE provided the source for YaST, and were
very careful about conforming to published and agreed upon industry
standards.
Steven
| < Previous | Next > |