Mailinglist Archive: opensuse (4570 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [SLE] Goodbye Hubert...
- From: Kevin Donnelly <kevin@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 10:15:02 +0000 (UTC)
- Message-id: <200511101019.34082.kevin@xxxxxxxxxx>
On Thursday 10 November 2005 09:12, Steven T. Hatton wrote:
> On Thursday 10 November 2005 04:08 am, Kevin Donnelly wrote:
> > On Thursday 10 November 2005 05:38, Steven T. Hatton wrote:
> > > I don't believe Novell execs
> > > quite understand what "free" in free software means.
> >
> > It's very sad that Dr Mantel has gone, and I also salute him for his work
> > on SuSE down the years. However, the above sentence is not entirely fair
> > - after all, Novell has opensourced all of SUSE for the first time, and
> > started opensuse (it could be argued that this should have been done
> > about 3 years ago, and Novell didn't own the company then).
>
> There was nothing wrong with SuSE retaining control of YaST. I said much
> about this in the past. The fact that there is free software does _not_
> mean that all software must be free. SuSE provided the source for YaST,
> and were very careful about conforming to published and agreed upon
> industry standards.
I agree, but the OP was saying that Novell had no commitment to free software,
which I don't think is borne out by the facts.
--
Pob hwyl / Best wishes
Kevin Donnelly
www.kyfieithu.co.uk - Meddalwedd Rhydd yn Gymraeg
www.cymrux.org.uk - Linux Cymraeg ar un CD
> On Thursday 10 November 2005 04:08 am, Kevin Donnelly wrote:
> > On Thursday 10 November 2005 05:38, Steven T. Hatton wrote:
> > > I don't believe Novell execs
> > > quite understand what "free" in free software means.
> >
> > It's very sad that Dr Mantel has gone, and I also salute him for his work
> > on SuSE down the years. However, the above sentence is not entirely fair
> > - after all, Novell has opensourced all of SUSE for the first time, and
> > started opensuse (it could be argued that this should have been done
> > about 3 years ago, and Novell didn't own the company then).
>
> There was nothing wrong with SuSE retaining control of YaST. I said much
> about this in the past. The fact that there is free software does _not_
> mean that all software must be free. SuSE provided the source for YaST,
> and were very careful about conforming to published and agreed upon
> industry standards.
I agree, but the OP was saying that Novell had no commitment to free software,
which I don't think is borne out by the facts.
--
Pob hwyl / Best wishes
Kevin Donnelly
www.kyfieithu.co.uk - Meddalwedd Rhydd yn Gymraeg
www.cymrux.org.uk - Linux Cymraeg ar un CD
| < Previous | Next > |