Mailinglist Archive: opensuse (4570 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [SLE] Clearing up the FUD on CLI/Mono
- From: Anders Johansson <andjoh@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2005 00:20:16 +0000 (UTC)
- Message-id: <200511130122.00642.andjoh@xxxxxxxxxx>
On Sunday 13 November 2005 01:01, Steven T. Hatton wrote:
> On Saturday 12 November 2005 03:00 pm, Steve Graegert wrote:
> > What would be the rationale behind using C++ in .NET?
>
> C++/CLI is an ECMA standardization effort.
Don't stare yourself blind at standards. The main issue is patents
FWIW, I consider c++ to be one of the worst languages ever to not be designed.
java in many ways is what C++ wanted to be, and with gcj's ability to compile
to native code, it isn't that bad at performance
> On Saturday 12 November 2005 03:00 pm, Steve Graegert wrote:
> > What would be the rationale behind using C++ in .NET?
>
> C++/CLI is an ECMA standardization effort.
Don't stare yourself blind at standards. The main issue is patents
FWIW, I consider c++ to be one of the worst languages ever to not be designed.
java in many ways is what C++ wanted to be, and with gcj's ability to compile
to native code, it isn't that bad at performance
| < Previous | Next > |