Mailinglist Archive: opensuse (4570 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [SLE] [OT...sort of]Hardcopy or electronic books?
- From: Randall R Schulz <rschulz@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2005 15:13:00 +0000 (UTC)
- Message-id: <200511220712.56307.rschulz@xxxxxxxxx>
Fergus,
On Tuesday 22 November 2005 01:17, Fergus Wilde wrote:
> ...
>
> Various highly misguided schemes, such as 'transferring' books and
> periodicals to microfilm, trashing the originals to save space, have
> already come horribly unstuck as 'disposable' 19th century newspapers
> prove time and again that they last a great deal better than the
> surrogate media intended to replace them. Nicholson Baker has written
> an excellent book on this theme, 'Double Fold: libraries and the
> assault on paper', 2002. Check it out for some very interesting
> findings on serious data longevity.
A library is not a museum. Libraries are there to get information
materials into the hands of people in the way that suits their needs
best, not to preserve antiquities.
As I said, I love books, too, but Nicholson Baker is so agog over his
beloved newspapers that he sees them as treasures to be preserved, not
records of their times to be made accessible to the public. His is an
antiquarian agenda, not a public information agenda. I'm not
necessarily saying fiche or film is (or was) the right solution to the
challenge of archival storage for newspapers, but neither do I believe
that paper is the apex of information recording and distribution media.
Randall Schulz
On Tuesday 22 November 2005 01:17, Fergus Wilde wrote:
> ...
>
> Various highly misguided schemes, such as 'transferring' books and
> periodicals to microfilm, trashing the originals to save space, have
> already come horribly unstuck as 'disposable' 19th century newspapers
> prove time and again that they last a great deal better than the
> surrogate media intended to replace them. Nicholson Baker has written
> an excellent book on this theme, 'Double Fold: libraries and the
> assault on paper', 2002. Check it out for some very interesting
> findings on serious data longevity.
A library is not a museum. Libraries are there to get information
materials into the hands of people in the way that suits their needs
best, not to preserve antiquities.
As I said, I love books, too, but Nicholson Baker is so agog over his
beloved newspapers that he sees them as treasures to be preserved, not
records of their times to be made accessible to the public. His is an
antiquarian agenda, not a public information agenda. I'm not
necessarily saying fiche or film is (or was) the right solution to the
challenge of archival storage for newspapers, but neither do I believe
that paper is the apex of information recording and distribution media.
Randall Schulz
| < Previous | Next > |