Mailinglist Archive: opensuse (4570 mails)

< Previous Next >
Re: [SLE] [OT...sort of]Hardcopy or electronic books?
  • From: "Carlos E. R." <robin1.listas@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 15:38:26 +0000 (UTC)
  • Message-id: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0511231635530.17924@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


The Tuesday 2005-11-22 at 22:07 -0800, Kai Ponte wrote:

> Having a long history with document imaging and storage systems, I ended up
> one time in a discussion about five years ago with one of the guys who was
> maintaining the records for the U-2 project, which at the time was still
> ongoing.

Sorry, I don't know what U-2 is :-?

> He had a great point - all their information is kept in microfilm.
> If they had tried to use some electronic means in the '50s, '60's, '70's or
> even '80s, it would have quickly been obsolete and extremely expensive to
> maintain. Microfilm on the other hand is cheap and longer lasting.

True, unfortunately. In the worst case, you only need a good magnifying
glass. On the other hand, it degrades with use (scratches).

- --
Cheers,
Carlos Robinson
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Made with pgp4pine 1.76

iD8DBQFDhIzvtTMYHG2NR9URAmY4AKCL0SXNhgCDwqw561JeIGa/552zSQCfYHkK
Pqp4bXJYqMHGyYTkzBTC5uQ=
=SKWC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


< Previous Next >