Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-project (422 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [opensuse-project] Time to decide: 11.4 or 12.0?
- From: Karsten König <remur@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 14:14:28 +0100
- Message-id: <201012221414.28637.remur@xxxxxxx>
On Wednesday 22 December 2010 13:59:49 Andrew Wafaa wrote:
What is the consistency besides randomly increasing the major or the minor
number? Even the first release was 4.2, not 1.0 or at least 4.0.
I know there used to be releases where the bump in major number was a
significant change, but this won't happen in the foreseeable future or am I
wrong?
I don't oppose the current numbering scheme, but then we should try to make
clear that we choose to have no system except old_releasenumber <
new_releasenumber, currently people might get the impression a bump from 11.3
to 12.0 might be more exiting then from 11.3 to 11.4.
Regards,
Karsten
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-project+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-project+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
OK now call me old fashioned if you wish, I don't mind, but the old
geeko's numbering scheme is fairly unique and has been relatively
consistent since I started using it (around 6.2).
What is the consistency besides randomly increasing the major or the minor
number? Even the first release was 4.2, not 1.0 or at least 4.0.
I know there used to be releases where the bump in major number was a
significant change, but this won't happen in the foreseeable future or am I
wrong?
I don't oppose the current numbering scheme, but then we should try to make
clear that we choose to have no system except old_releasenumber <
new_releasenumber, currently people might get the impression a bump from 11.3
to 12.0 might be more exiting then from 11.3 to 11.4.
Regards,
Karsten
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-project+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-project+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
| < Previous | Next > |