Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-project (229 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [opensuse-project] Some additional comments, thoughts and questions about openFATE screening
- From: Andreas Jaeger <aj@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 16:59:28 +0100
- Message-id: <201011161659.28331.aj@xxxxxxxxxx>
On Tuesday 16 November 2010 13:33:18 Stanislav Visnovsky wrote:
I have been considering as well a general "openSUSE distribution" product
but was not sure how to do it properly. Could you elaborate a bit more when
this backlog will be used and what will be done with e.g. openSUSE 11.4?
Andreas
--
Andreas Jaeger, Program Manager openSUSE, aj@{novell.com,opensuse.org}
Twitter: jaegerandi | Identica: jaegerandi
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)
Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-project+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-project+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Hi!
On piatok 12 November 2010 07:06:54 Satoru Matsumoto wrote:
After yesterday's openFATE screening team IRC meeting, I've overviewed
recently requested features (via new instance) and got some additional
impressions and questions which should be shared and further
discussed.
# You can read the mention below on http://openfate.titanpad.com/notes
# as well. ;-)
I was thinking about the issue of postponing features. I would propose
to use the 'Package Wishlist' approach, i.e. use backlog
The idea is to use collect all features that are not ready to be
integrated into a release (underdefined, no good solution found, ...)
in a backlog bag. Only when we have an idea, how to implement a
feature, ideally to have already someone willing to work on the
feature, the feature would be marked for particular release.
This approach will eliminate postponing features forever, at least for
big number of features where this would happen. Also, it would keep us
from cleaning up huge list of features for each release.
Did we consider this approach before? If yes, what are the reasons
against it?
I have been considering as well a general "openSUSE distribution" product
but was not sure how to do it properly. Could you elaborate a bit more when
this backlog will be used and what will be done with e.g. openSUSE 11.4?
Andreas
--
Andreas Jaeger, Program Manager openSUSE, aj@{novell.com,opensuse.org}
Twitter: jaegerandi | Identica: jaegerandi
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)
Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-project+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-project+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
| < Previous | Next > |