Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-factory (1165 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [opensuse-factory] tiny-nvidia-installer removed from factory
- From: Stefan Dirsch <sndirsch@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 17:11:58 +0100
- Message-id: <20061102161158.GA16354@xxxxxxx>
On Thu, Nov 02, 2006 at 03:17:53PM +0100, Martin Schlander wrote:
> Torsdag 02 november 2006 10:33 skrev Stefan Dirsch:
> > On Thu, Nov 02, 2006 at 08:55:22AM -0000, B.Weber@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > > I suspect it's unlikely packman would want to host these as they're dodgy
> > > both legally and morally. Only nvidia should have to take the risk.
> > > (Although no-one seems to have sued Debian and canonical yet)
> >
> > Hmm. Sure that Debian/Ubuntu provides prebuilt NVIDIA packages?
>
> I'm pretty sure packages exist for Ubuntu, although they might be 3rd party.
> I'm absolutely sure FC have them via the 3rd party ilvna repo:
> http://rpm.livna.org/fedora/6/i386/
Ok.
> The idea of Packman hosting the packages was presented before. I believe their
> hesitation was not so much fear of GPL violation. More a matter of (1)
> redistribution rights for Nvidia/ATi and (2) building the packages in the
> first place, iirc.
>
> I think the redistribution rights issue was cleared up, not sure about the
> building issue.
Building should be pretty easy using the Source RPMs, e.g. use a
*local* osc build.
Best regards,
Stefan
Public Key available
------------------------------------------------------
Stefan Dirsch (Res. & Dev.) SUSE LINUX Products GmbH
Tel: 0911-740 53 0 Maxfeldstraße 5
FAX: 0911-740 53 479 D-90409 Nürnberg
http://www.suse.de Germany
------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Torsdag 02 november 2006 10:33 skrev Stefan Dirsch:
> > On Thu, Nov 02, 2006 at 08:55:22AM -0000, B.Weber@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > > I suspect it's unlikely packman would want to host these as they're dodgy
> > > both legally and morally. Only nvidia should have to take the risk.
> > > (Although no-one seems to have sued Debian and canonical yet)
> >
> > Hmm. Sure that Debian/Ubuntu provides prebuilt NVIDIA packages?
>
> I'm pretty sure packages exist for Ubuntu, although they might be 3rd party.
> I'm absolutely sure FC have them via the 3rd party ilvna repo:
> http://rpm.livna.org/fedora/6/i386/
Ok.
> The idea of Packman hosting the packages was presented before. I believe their
> hesitation was not so much fear of GPL violation. More a matter of (1)
> redistribution rights for Nvidia/ATi and (2) building the packages in the
> first place, iirc.
>
> I think the redistribution rights issue was cleared up, not sure about the
> building issue.
Building should be pretty easy using the Source RPMs, e.g. use a
*local* osc build.
Best regards,
Stefan
Public Key available
------------------------------------------------------
Stefan Dirsch (Res. & Dev.) SUSE LINUX Products GmbH
Tel: 0911-740 53 0 Maxfeldstraße 5
FAX: 0911-740 53 479 D-90409 Nürnberg
http://www.suse.de Germany
------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
| < Previous | Next > |