Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-factory (599 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [opensuse-factory] distribution meeting - introduction and agenda
- From: Andreas Jaeger <aj@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 14:32:36 +0200
- Message-id: <ho64grlezf.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
"Mauricio Teixeira (netmask)" <netmask@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> Em Qui, 2006-08-17 às 13:04 +0200, Andreas Hanke escreveu:
>
>> At least rug runs SuSEconfig after each transaction, and it's _painful_
>> compared to YaST because other than YaST, it doesn't show what it does,
>
> Well, I've never used rug, so I was not sure about it.
>
> Regarding smart, it's an old request to run SuSEconfig at the end, but
> looks like we'll wait for this discussion here to reach a decision so we
> would make ours on smart. :)
>
> And sure running the needed scripts on %post would do the trick, but it
> would require a lot of documentation so that the packagers would know
> if/when/how/why would they need to do that.
We already noticed that we have a lot of scripts that are not needed
anymore - just historic garbage :-(. Those can be removed. Let's see
which scripts we still need and what technical solution is needed.
If in the end out of 20 scripts, we keep 2 - and the runtime for these
is not anymore 20s on my machine but 1s, then I'm fine ;-)
Andreas
--
Andreas Jaeger, aj@xxxxxxx, http://www.suse.de/~aj/
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126
> Em Qui, 2006-08-17 às 13:04 +0200, Andreas Hanke escreveu:
>
>> At least rug runs SuSEconfig after each transaction, and it's _painful_
>> compared to YaST because other than YaST, it doesn't show what it does,
>
> Well, I've never used rug, so I was not sure about it.
>
> Regarding smart, it's an old request to run SuSEconfig at the end, but
> looks like we'll wait for this discussion here to reach a decision so we
> would make ours on smart. :)
>
> And sure running the needed scripts on %post would do the trick, but it
> would require a lot of documentation so that the packagers would know
> if/when/how/why would they need to do that.
We already noticed that we have a lot of scripts that are not needed
anymore - just historic garbage :-(. Those can be removed. Let's see
which scripts we still need and what technical solution is needed.
If in the end out of 20 scripts, we keep 2 - and the runtime for these
is not anymore 20s on my machine but 1s, then I'm fine ;-)
Andreas
--
Andreas Jaeger, aj@xxxxxxx, http://www.suse.de/~aj/
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126
| < Previous | Next > |