Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-factory (599 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [opensuse-factory] distribution meeting - introduction and agenda
- From: Boyd Lynn Gerber <gerberb@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 10:41:10 -0600
- Message-id: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0608161034410.21853@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
>
> The packagers have started already with the first packages, we want
> to discuss the timeframe for the move and the move of GNOME to /usr
> (from /opt/gnome).
I really like this move. I am just concerned that there will not be
enough time in the current schedule to complete the entire task.
> * SuSEconfig removal
>
> SuSEconfig is currently run after each package installation by YaST
> and is a huge bottleneck. Some scripts have already been removed
> and we have to discuss how to move on.
I agree with this. I think the changes needed should be done at the time.
I dislike the running of this script all the time.
> * update messages general/conditional (e.g. bind)
>
> During update of packages they could notify users about changes via
> email and/or the SuSEplugger (until 10.0, this is not anymore in
> 10.1). Most of these are outdated and not really usefull anymore
> and should be removed. The question is how to handle situations
> like bind where config files get rewritten and the user should be
> informed if this fails.
I prefer the email notification. I would like to see the few situations
where config files change that an email is sent to root.
> * Linker Options and Optimizations
>
> We plan to use the recently developed linker optimizations for the
> GNU hashstyle and use the readonly relocations:
>
> LDFLAGS="-Wl,-O1 -Wl,--hash-style=both"
> (http://lwn.net/Articles/192082/ )
> LDFLAGS="-Wl,-z relro"
> (see http://people.redhat.com/drepper/nonselsec.pdf)
I think this is a good move. Also I prefer the dropping of UP kernel. I
like having things as close to the same as possible. I think the
advantages out way the disadvantages.
Thanks,
- --
Boyd Gerber <gerberb@xxxxxxxxx>
ZENEZ 1042 East Fort Union #135, Midvale Utah 84047
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://quantumlab.net/pine_privacy_guard/
iD8DBQFE40qrVtBjDid73eYRAprDAJ46bLlHfX/JSDvacxSr8KV6OLZ8KwCfSCJG
wizHHdAl8jkeu8qddmF//kw=
=LAhV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Hash: SHA1
>
> The packagers have started already with the first packages, we want
> to discuss the timeframe for the move and the move of GNOME to /usr
> (from /opt/gnome).
I really like this move. I am just concerned that there will not be
enough time in the current schedule to complete the entire task.
> * SuSEconfig removal
>
> SuSEconfig is currently run after each package installation by YaST
> and is a huge bottleneck. Some scripts have already been removed
> and we have to discuss how to move on.
I agree with this. I think the changes needed should be done at the time.
I dislike the running of this script all the time.
> * update messages general/conditional (e.g. bind)
>
> During update of packages they could notify users about changes via
> email and/or the SuSEplugger (until 10.0, this is not anymore in
> 10.1). Most of these are outdated and not really usefull anymore
> and should be removed. The question is how to handle situations
> like bind where config files get rewritten and the user should be
> informed if this fails.
I prefer the email notification. I would like to see the few situations
where config files change that an email is sent to root.
> * Linker Options and Optimizations
>
> We plan to use the recently developed linker optimizations for the
> GNU hashstyle and use the readonly relocations:
>
> LDFLAGS="-Wl,-O1 -Wl,--hash-style=both"
> (http://lwn.net/Articles/192082/ )
> LDFLAGS="-Wl,-z relro"
> (see http://people.redhat.com/drepper/nonselsec.pdf)
I think this is a good move. Also I prefer the dropping of UP kernel. I
like having things as close to the same as possible. I think the
advantages out way the disadvantages.
Thanks,
- --
Boyd Gerber <gerberb@xxxxxxxxx>
ZENEZ 1042 East Fort Union #135, Midvale Utah 84047
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://quantumlab.net/pine_privacy_guard/
iD8DBQFE40qrVtBjDid73eYRAprDAJ46bLlHfX/JSDvacxSr8KV6OLZ8KwCfSCJG
wizHHdAl8jkeu8qddmF//kw=
=LAhV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
| < Previous | Next > |