Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-buildservice (344 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [opensuse-buildservice] _link not required anymore for new packages
- From: Olaf Hering <olaf@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 3 May 2010 12:08:19 +0200
- Message-id: <20100503100819.GA17489@xxxxxxxxx>
On Mon, May 03, Michael Schroeder wrote:
home:olh:cross
old, both have expected state:
template-binutils does not have a template-binutils.spec, state "excluded"
template-basesystem does have a template-basesystem.spec, state "unresolvable"
new:
template-dmake does not have a template-dmake.spec, but it has state "success"
Its not obvious for me whats the difference, I have not changed meta
data or anything.
Olaf
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
On Sat, May 01, 2010 at 03:42:49PM +0200, Olaf Hering wrote:
When a new package "xy" is added via webinterface, which contains
"a.spec" and "b.spec", it was required to create a package "a" and "b"
which link to "xy" to actually get the a.rpm and b.rpm.
Since yesterday the packages get built right away when commiting the
spec files, before the _link exists.
Is this change intentional?
I can't think of any change in that part of the code. What exactly
was the "old" behaviour? In which project do you see that change?
home:olh:cross
old, both have expected state:
template-binutils does not have a template-binutils.spec, state "excluded"
template-basesystem does have a template-basesystem.spec, state "unresolvable"
new:
template-dmake does not have a template-dmake.spec, but it has state "success"
Its not obvious for me whats the difference, I have not changed meta
data or anything.
Olaf
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
| < Previous | Next > |