Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-buildservice (339 mails)

[Rodrigo Moya <rodrigo@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Wed, 2008-03-12 at 16:06 +0100, Dr. Peter Poeml wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 01:20:51PM +0100, Rodrigo Moya wrote:
> > On Wed, 2008-03-05 at 12:29 +0100, Dr. Peter Poeml wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I'm missing a connection between buildservice and bugzilla. For example,
> > > there is no way to see open bugs for a specific buildservice
> > > project/package. 
> > >
> > > I would like to have something like this:
> > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/zope3/
> > > which is linked from 
> > > https://launchpad.net/zope3/
> > > and shows bugs associated with that project.
> > >
> > > What would others think about that?
> > I like it a lot, the problem I see is that our bugzilla does not have
> > all packages as components, so you would end up getting all GNOME bugs
> > for, for instance, gnome-power-manager. We (in GNOME team) are starting
> > to use the status whiteboard to have a better classification of bugs per
> > GNOME upstream product, so this should help.
>
> By the way, I just noticed something else I didn't know before. I saw
> this posted on the yum list:
>
> |> bug reports for yum and friends are here:
> |> 
> |> http://bugz.fedoraproject.org/yum
> |> http://bugz.fedoraproject.org/yum-utils
> |> http://bugz.fedoraproject.org/createrepo
> |> http://bugz.fedoraproject.org/yum-metadata-parser
> |> http://bugz.fedoraproject.org/yum-updatesd
>
> I have to admit, I'm getting really envious when I see those URLs. I
> want that too!
/me too, or like what bugzilla.gnome has:

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/browse.cgi

or

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/browse.cgi?product=gnome-control-center

so, who do we need to convince to get all packages as products in our
bugzilla? :-)
-- 
Rodrigo Moya <rodrigo@xxxxxxxxxx>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx