Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-buildservice (257 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [opensuse-buildservice] Re: [RFC] Release numbers and the Kernel project
- From: Jan Blunck <jblunck@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2006 15:49:37 +0200
- Message-id: <20061016134936.GA13908@xxxxxxxxxxx>
On Mon, Oct 16, Marian Jancar wrote:
> Jan Blunck wrote:
> > So you think that a package is still "compatible" just because the version
> > number is the same? The buildservice shouldn't be that "clever". If somebody
> > checked in new sources all dependent packages should be rebuild.
>
> In most cases it will be compatible. What about a checkin switch to
> trigger the rebuild when the new sources are known to be incompatible?
No, I'm no fan of "yet-another-optional-switch". IMHO "In most cases it won't
be compatible" is the safer assumption. This is how we did it since long
ago. So I guess we don't want to change this.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Jan Blunck wrote:
> > So you think that a package is still "compatible" just because the version
> > number is the same? The buildservice shouldn't be that "clever". If somebody
> > checked in new sources all dependent packages should be rebuild.
>
> In most cases it will be compatible. What about a checkin switch to
> trigger the rebuild when the new sources are known to be incompatible?
No, I'm no fan of "yet-another-optional-switch". IMHO "In most cases it won't
be compatible" is the safer assumption. This is how we did it since long
ago. So I guess we don't want to change this.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
| < Previous | Next > |