If I have a request for updating a package that is contained in the "security" repo, how/where would I file this?
Concerning the nitrokey app there is a recent update to 2.1.1 with new functionalities available,as opposed to the current offer of 1.4.2 (which is BTW perfectly functional, but limited when it comes to the newer versions of the nitrokey (nitrokey pro3 etc), currently in the "security" repo. Nitrokey is the same hardware idea as yubikey (allowing gpg/otp and so on) just to make you understand what kind of software / hardware this is. In such a case, would I file a bugzilla request for this package, or is software of the security repo not supported via bugzilla? Just trying to avoid to create unintentionally some invalid request. Thank you.
On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 01:46:29PM +0200, Stakanov wrote:
Concerning the nitrokey app there is a recent update to 2.1.1 with new functionalities available,as opposed to the current offer of 1.4.2 (which is BTW perfectly functional, but limited when it comes to the newer versions of the nitrokey (nitrokey pro3 etc), currently in the "security" repo.
Nitrokey is the same hardware idea as yubikey (allowing gpg/otp and so on) just to make you understand what kind of software / hardware this is.
In such a case, would I file a bugzilla request for this package, or is software of the security repo not supported via bugzilla? Just trying to avoid to create unintentionally some invalid request.
You can just either file a bugzilla , comment in the package, or even do it yourself if you want. Ciao, Marcus
On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 01:46:29PM +0200, Stakanov wrote:
Concerning the nitrokey app there is a recent update to 2.1.1 with new functionalities available,as opposed to the current offer of 1.4.2 (which is BTW perfectly functional, but limited when it comes to the newer versions of the nitrokey (nitrokey pro3 etc), currently in the "security" repo.
Nitrokey is the same hardware idea as yubikey (allowing gpg/otp and so on) just to make you understand what kind of software / hardware this is.
In such a case, would I file a bugzilla request for this package, or is software of the security repo not supported via bugzilla? Just trying to avoid to create unintentionally some invalid request.
You can just either file a bugzilla , comment in the package, or even do it yourself if you want.
Ciao, Marcus Do it myself (yeah, I wish I would have these skills) is out of reach, but in
In data lunedì 23 ottobre 2023 13:55:20 CEST, Marcus Meissner ha scritto: the quest to enhance the existing, maybe you can elaborate on "comment in the package"? Doing this maybe is possible and, provided I am getting to a sound understanding what I am doing, I could learn/do it. Feel free to educate me. Thanks.
On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 04:13:06PM +0200, Stakanov wrote:
On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 01:46:29PM +0200, Stakanov wrote:
Concerning the nitrokey app there is a recent update to 2.1.1 with new functionalities available,as opposed to the current offer of 1.4.2 (which is BTW perfectly functional, but limited when it comes to the newer versions of the nitrokey (nitrokey pro3 etc), currently in the "security" repo.
Nitrokey is the same hardware idea as yubikey (allowing gpg/otp and so on) just to make you understand what kind of software / hardware this is.
In such a case, would I file a bugzilla request for this package, or is software of the security repo not supported via bugzilla? Just trying to avoid to create unintentionally some invalid request.
You can just either file a bugzilla , comment in the package, or even do it yourself if you want.
Ciao, Marcus Do it myself (yeah, I wish I would have these skills) is out of reach, but in
In data lunedì 23 ottobre 2023 13:55:20 CEST, Marcus Meissner ha scritto: the quest to enhance the existing, maybe you can elaborate on "comment in the package"? Doing this maybe is possible and, provided I am getting to a sound understanding what I am doing, I could learn/do it.
I added nitrokey-app2 to security project, please test Ciao, Marcus
In data lunedì 30 ottobre 2023 17:54:28 CET, Marcus Meissner ha scritto:
On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 04:13:06PM +0200, Stakanov wrote:
In data lunedì 23 ottobre 2023 13:55:20 CEST, Marcus Meissner ha scritto:
On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 01:46:29PM +0200, Stakanov wrote:
Concerning the nitrokey app there is a recent update to 2.1.1 with new functionalities available,as opposed to the current offer of 1.4.2 (which is BTW perfectly functional, but limited when it comes to the newer versions of the nitrokey (nitrokey pro3 etc), currently in the "security" repo.
Nitrokey is the same hardware idea as yubikey (allowing gpg/otp and so on) just to make you understand what kind of software / hardware this is.
In such a case, would I file a bugzilla request for this package, or is software of the security repo not supported via bugzilla? Just trying to avoid to create unintentionally some invalid request.
You can just either file a bugzilla , comment in the package, or even do it yourself if you want.
Ciao, Marcus
Do it myself (yeah, I wish I would have these skills) is out of reach, but in the quest to enhance the existing, maybe you can elaborate on "comment in the package"? Doing this maybe is possible and, provided I am getting to a sound understanding what I am doing, I could learn/do it.
I added nitrokey-app2 to security project, please test
Ciao, Marcus
Dear Marcus, thank you very much. I am encountering an issue with a dependency, left you a need info in the bug today.
participants (2)
-
Marcus Meissner -
Stakanov