- openSUSE Project

[project] https://ciq.com/whitepaper/vendor-kernels-bugs-stability/
by Felix Miata 18 May '24

18 May '24

https://ciq.com/whitepaper/vendor-kernels-bugs-stability/ [quote] A vendor kernel is an insecure kernel. A late cycle stabilized vendor kernel is doubly so. [/quote] If I understand this, it means Leap's default kernels are among the least secure available. :( -- Evolution as taught in public schools is, like religion, based on faith, not based on science. Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409 ** a11y rocks! Felix Miata

6 5

Fwd: Weblate Outage
by Lubos Kocman 10 May '24

10 May '24

(on behalf of Padraig Dillion) Planning Disruption for Weblate Migration The [openSUSE](https://www.opensuse.org/) will undergo a critical update with the migration of [Weblate](https://l10n.opensuse.org/) to a hosted solution. Shifting to a hosted solution for the web-based localization tool in order to keep up with the increasing demands of projects’ development. The migration is slated for May 14 and it is anticipated that the service will be down for approximately one day. This is a planned short-term inconvenience for a long-term benefit and will allow for our translation contributors to pick up right where they left off. People wanting to contribute to the openSUSE Project by helping to translate using [Weblate](https://weblate.org/en/) can register on https://l10n.opensuse.org and connect with other translators through translation(a)lists.opensuse.org and project(a)lists.opensuse.org mailing lists. Any attempt to connect to Weblate during the migration will trigger a notification informing the user of the ongoing maintenance. Others will be informed of the outage through https://status.opensuse.org. -- Best regards Luboš Kocman openSUSE Leap Release Manager

1 0

Translations for openSUSE Leap 15.6 Release Announcement / Screenshots
by ddemaio openSUSE 07 May '24

07 May '24

Hi everyone, I have placed the release announcement for openSUSE Leap 15.6 on the wiki at https://en.opensuse.org/Release_announcement_15.6 It would be highly appreciated if you could help to translate the release announcement to your native language to help propagate the news of our next release. Currently it is only in English. Feel free to link your translated version to the top and include your ISO 639-1 Code language code. If you have any questions, please let me know. It would be ideal to have this complete by June 4. Screenshots If you wold like to do screenshots, you can start the page at https://en.opensuse.org/Portal:15.6/Screenshots and add new screenshots. v/r Doug

1 0

openSUSE Github Organization Owner Governance
by Henne Vogelsang 06 May '24

06 May '24

Hey, we don't really have any description of the governance of the openSUSE organization on github. There are also not very many org maintainers active anymore. I think it's a bit too important to leave this undefined. Here is my proposal on how to do this in a slightly more structured way: https://github.com/openSUSE/.github/pull/1 Let us know what you think in the pull request. Henne -- Henne Vogelsang http://www.opensuse.org Everybody has a plan, until they get hit. - Mike Tyson

1 0

TSP for openSUSE Conference 2024
by ddemaio openSUSE 06 May '24

06 May '24

Hi all, We will not be accepting any more TSP requests for the openSUSE Conference 2024. We've had a large amount of requests and will do our best to accommodate those that have already been submitted requests. If you know any companies that would like to sponsor the conference, please have them view the prospectus at https://en.opensuse.org/images/f/f6/OSC24prospectus.pdf or people can also donate at https://geekos.org/sponsorship/ to assist with more travel support. v/r Doug

1 0

Board statement on the Code of Conduct.
by Simon Lees 30 Apr '24

30 Apr '24

Let me confirm that all board members unanimously agree that the Code of Conduct applies uniformly across all openSUSE community spaces and platforms including mailing lists, forums, IRC and others. Additionally we believe it applies to all individuals contributing to or representing the community, including any instances where a member is choosing to use an @opensuse.org email address, IRC Cloak or any other mention of a relationship to openSUSE in there communication. Simon Lees (on behalf of the board) -- Simon Lees (Simotek) http://simotek.net Emergency Update Team keybase.io/simotek SUSE Linux Adelaide Australia, UTC+10:30 GPG Fingerprint: 5B87 DB9D 88DC F606 E489 CEC5 0922 C246 02F0 014B

6 5

Tomorrow's openSUSE Release call is cancelled
by Lubos Kocman 30 Apr '24

30 Apr '24

Hello openSUSE Tomorrow's openSUSE Release call is cancelled as most countries have a public holiday. Everyone is welcome to provide an update for the past week in the etherpad https://etherpad.opensuse.org/p/ReleaseEngineering-20240501 Many thanks and enjoy the sunny weather! ps. I noticed that all release call sessions in calendar-o-o were cancelled, so that should be fixed now. -- Best regards Luboš Kocman openSUSE Leap Release Manager

1 0

On the efficacy of the openSUSE Board
by Richard Brown 19 Apr '24

19 Apr '24

Dear Project, The latest incident on this list has me questioning the efficacy of the openSUSE Board While I am not yet at the point of joining the calls for their full re-election, I do feel the Board as a whole and as individuals need to do more to justify the trust we put in them as a Project. The entire operation of the Board can only ever work if the Project trusts its Board. I do not see how Project members with integrity can do so at the moment. This fact undermines any decision, guidance or conflict resolution action of the Board and leads to a perverse situation where the morally & ethically “right” action could well be to ignore the Board and its decisions. Before I highlight concerns regarding individual Board members, I think the biggest issue is one they need to address as a whole - how the Board communicate and defend their decisions as a Board. I strongly believe that the Board should defend its decisions as a group. Once a decision is made, I feel the Board should all, collectively, own it and defend it. I do not think Board decisions can be defended individually. The whole point of the Board is to decide on topics (eg. conflict resolution) where individual empowerment has failed and an independent body is needed to step in and chart a course, often a controversial one. Easy decisions shouldn't need the Board. It is an imperfect model - In my time on the Board I certainly hated repeatedly defending decisions I disagreed with, but it is the role the Project requires. If the Board does not wish to operate under this model, then I think the only way forward is for each individual Board member to be far more active and visible than most of them currently are. Taking this recent incident as an example. I've been able to clearly take away the following from the recent incident: Simon has continued his mindset of "tolerating intolerance" and advocating for the support and inclusion of people who breach our community standards. This is consistent with his views during the "Rainbow flag" discussions of 9 months ago. His views do not appear to have evolved over those 9 months and I feel should disqualify them from being a Board member. I expressed this view both in my vote and in my campaigning for any-other-candidate in the last election, and intend to continue to do so. Neal and Gerald have been quietly supportive of the concept of consistent moderation, but I'd characterise their engagement with the thread as 'diplomatically attempting to avoid conflict', sometimes at the expense of addressing what needs to be addressed. I cannot say that I am wholly confident that I know where either of them stand or whether they believe very strongly on this topic. Gertjan was obviously strongly supportive of the concept of consistent moderation, to the point where he has clearly resigned over his perceived lack of support from his Board colleagues on the topic. Absolutely nothing has been heard from Douglas (besides wishing Gertjan well) or Patrick. The most generous assessment of their involvement in the Board is that they are currently empty chairs. If I was to speculate, based on Gertjan's decision to resign, it would be reasonable to assume that they lean more towards the Simon-side of the debate, making Gertjan's position for strong moderation clearly untenable as a minority opinion. But we just cannot be sure, because they are effectively absent. If the Board is not going to defend its decisions collectively (and this whole debate was triggered by a Board decision, it was even minuted), then the Board must all be active as individuals. If the Board fails to step up, either as a collective or as individuals, I do not see how they can effectively serve the Project. In its current form, I do not see how Project members are expected to respect, honour, or even consider their views more seriously than any other random person in the Project. Regards, Richard -- Richard Brown Distributions Architect SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH, Frankenstraße 146, D-90461 Nuremberg, Germany (HRB 36809, AG Nürnberg) Managing Directors/Geschäftsführer: Ivo Totev, Andrew McDonald, Werner Knoblich

23 52

Next openSUSE Board Meeting
by ddemaio openSUSE 17 Apr '24

17 Apr '24

The openSUSE board meeting next week is scheduled at a different time than normal. This is planned for April 25 at 15:00 UTC or 17:00 CET. Should you want to join, visit calendar.opensuse.org for more details. v/r Doug

1 0

Gmail and opensuse.org and suse.com mails
by Gerald Pfeifer 17 Apr '24

17 Apr '24

These last days several of us "lost" mails to opensuse.org and suse.com addresses which we ended up finding in Gmail's spam folder. I recommend you have a look there. Gerald

2 1